200+ Persuasive Essay & Speech Topics for 2026 (With Examples)
Browse 200+ persuasive essay and speech topics for 2026 — categorized by subject and grade level, each with sample thesis statements and outlines to get you started.
📋 Table of Contents (6 sections) ▼
All of us use persuasion informally in our everyday lives and have done so since we were young. When you were younger, didn't you try to persuade your mother to allow you to have dessert without eating your vegetables or to stay up late past your bedtime? Haven't you tried to persuade a friend to see a particular movie or to help you with your homework? Think of all the many ways you tried to persuade people to see your point of view. Now all you have to do is translate those same feelings into a persuasive essay.
However, a persuasive essay is a little bit different than how you use persuasion in daily life because you are trying to persuade someone to change his or her mind using a formal argumentative structure. Your language needs to be academic, as you are maturing as a writer. You need to be as rational as possible, even when there is an emotional side to your argument. There should be two sides to the issue you are discussing and you should use logical as well as emotional reasoning to convey your thought process.
What is a Persuasive Essay?
Beginning a persuasive essay can seem daunting at first. Unlike conventional informative essays, a persuasive essay has to express a particular point-of-view. The critical element of a persuasive essay is that it contains an arguable thesis, preferably stated in one sentence at the end of the first paragraph. All of us use persuasion informally in our everyday lives and have done so since we were young. When you were younger, didn't you try to persuade your mother to allow you to have dessert without eating your vegetables or to stay up late past your bedtime? Haven't you tried to persuade a friend to see a particular movie or to help you with your homework?
But a persuasive essay is a little bit different than how you use persuasion in daily life because you are trying to persuade someone to change his or her mind using a formal argumentative structure. There should be two sides to the issue you are discussing and you should use logical as well as emotional reasoning to convey your thought process.
It is worth noting that in 2026, persuasive writing has become more important than ever. With social media platforms amplifying every opinion and AI-generated content flooding the internet, the ability to construct a well-reasoned, evidence-backed argument in essay form is a skill that genuinely sets students apart — in the classroom, in college applications, and eventually in the workplace. Learning how to write a persuasive essay is not just an academic exercise; it is a form of intellectual self-defense and civic participation.
How to Start a Persuasive Essay
Students often throw up their hands in despair when asked to create a persuasive thesis. "I don't have any strong opinions on anything," they often say. The first step of writing a persuasive essay is to brainstorm ideas. Ask yourself what do I believe? What issue am I passionate about?
It cannot be stressed enough that it is extremely important that there are two sides to the issue you are arguing. For a good essay, the two different sides should be compelling. For example, many students want to use the topic "you should stop smoking" for their persuasive essays. But there are no really good arguments in favor of people choosing to smoke. Yes, it is true that people still do smoke despite the overwhelming evidence that smoking is bad for their health. But there are no logical reasons to embrace this bad health habit. A persuasive claim must have a reasonable counter-argument using logos, ethos, and pathos (logic, ethics, and emotion). Ask yourself: if you had to debate the opposite side of the issue you are arguing, could you do it? If not, you do not have a good topic for a persuasive essay.
Once you have selected your topic, it is time to do some more research. After learning more about the different sides of the issue, you can refine your thesis or perhaps even change it. Have a good sense of your audience when reframing your claim. If your intended audience is extremely familiar with the topic, you will not need to give a great deal of background information. On the other hand, if you know your professor knows very little about the issue (for example, if your persuasive speech is about online bullying and you know that your teacher is not active on social media) you may need to provide a more extensive setup. Even if you give information to your reader about the topic, however, don't lose sight of the fact that you are not writing a purely informative essay.
A useful brainstorming technique is to set a ten-minute timer and free-write every opinion you hold — no matter how small or large — without judging yourself. You might be surprised to discover that you feel strongly about issues like local zoning laws, the way streaming platforms handle content moderation, or whether standardized testing is a fair measure of intelligence. Once the timer goes off, review your list and circle the topics where you wrote the most passionately or where you can immediately think of at least one strong counterargument. Those are your best candidates for a persuasive essay topic.
What Are Persuasive Essay Topics?
The goal of a persuasive essay is to convince the reader to think or act differently. Persuasive essay topics can be about controversial subjects, but they are different from argumentative essay topics in several key ways.
For one, a persuasive essay does not use the same rhetorical devices as an argumentative essay no matter what essay topics you choose. A persuasive essay is similar to an argumentative essay in its overall structure but your advice should appeal to reason and urge the person to agree.
Second, a persuasive essay is more about getting the reader to take action or convincing the reader to adopt your point of view. An argument can be about an abstract issue or principle. With a persuasive essay topic, you genuinely want to urge the reader to take action, not just make a philosophical case about an issue.
Think of it this way: an argumentative essay might examine whether artificial intelligence poses an existential risk to humanity — weighing both sides with equal detachment. A persuasive essay on the same subject, however, would come down firmly on one side: "The federal government must immediately regulate large language model development before the risks outpace our ability to respond." The persuasive version has urgency, a clear call to action, and a specific audience it is trying to move. That distinction — between detached analysis and motivated advocacy — is the heart of what makes persuasive essay topics unique.
200+ Persuasive Essay & Speech Topics for 2026
Below are more than 200 persuasive topics for 2026 — for both persuasive essays and persuasive speeches — grouped into eight subject areas plus a cluster of this year's most current debates and a dedicated set of speech topics. Each is written as a claim you can take a side on, and each is flagged [HS], [College], or [HS/College]. If you still need to master the writing itself, see our full guide to writing a persuasive essay; if your assignment is closer to a reasoned debate, our argumentative essay guide and topics and our compare and contrast essay topics and our cause and effect essay topics and informative essay topics are the sister resources; and for ideas beyond persuasion, browse 300+ essay topics with examples.
How to Choose a Strong Persuasive Topic
The topic you choose is the foundation of your entire argument. A weak topic forces you to build on sand — you may write polished sentences, but your essay or speech will never fully convince anyone of anything. Knowing what separates a compelling topic from a dead-end one before you write a single sentence saves enormous time and produces dramatically stronger results.
A strong persuasive topic meets three essential criteria. First, you can take a clear, arguable position — meaning reasonable people currently disagree, so there is actually something to persuade your audience about. Second, it matters to your audience right now — the issue connects to something they experience, fear, value, or stand to gain or lose in the near future. Third, you can support your position with both evidence and emotional or ethical appeals — facts and data alone rarely change minds; you also need a values-based or human dimension that makes the argument hit home. A topic that satisfies all three gives you the raw material to build a genuinely persuasive case.
Compare these weak and strong versions:
- Weak: Social media affects teenagers. Stronger: High schools should enforce a no-phone policy during the school day to protect adolescent attention and mental health. (The weak version is far too broad and states no position; the stronger version is narrowed to a specific, debatable policy.)
- Weak: Climate change is caused by human activity. Stronger: The federal government should mandate carbon-neutral operations for all Fortune 500 companies by 2035. (The weak version is an established scientific fact, not an arguable stance; the stronger version proposes a contestable course of action.)
- Weak: Ancient Rome had an interesting political system. Stronger: American electoral reform should adopt ranked-choice voting before the 2028 presidential election. (The weak version gives the audience no personal stake; the stronger version is urgent and directly affects the people in the room.)
- Weak: Drunk driving is dangerous and should be stopped. Stronger: Cities that have expanded late-night public transit options should be required to run those services 24 hours on weekends to reduce impaired driving fatalities. (The weak version is a tired, universally accepted claim with no real opposition; the stronger version is fresh, specific, and genuinely debatable.)
One final test: ask yourself whether your topic carries an emotional or values dimension — a question of fairness, safety, freedom, or responsibility — that you can genuinely appeal to. If your topic only asks readers to accept a fact or understand a concept, it belongs in an analytical or expository essay, not a persuasive one. The best persuasive topics make your audience feel that something real is at stake.
Trending Persuasive Topics for 2026
The most persuasive arguments are grounded in issues that feel immediate and unresolved. The following topics reflect debates actively playing out in legislatures, classrooms, and workplaces right now — each framed as a specific, arguable claim you can defend or challenge with current evidence, ethical reasoning, and genuine audience stakes.
- Governments must establish binding regulations on large AI developers to prevent algorithmic discrimination and protect public safety before the technology outpaces oversight. This topic invites arguments about innovation versus accountability, civil liberties, and the limits of corporate self-regulation. [College]
- The United States should implement a universal basic income pilot program to address growing economic displacement caused by automation. Students can draw on competing economic research, social safety-net values, and real-world pilot results from other countries. [HS/College]
- Federal law should prohibit children under the age of sixteen from holding social media accounts, with platforms held legally liable for violations. This debate balances parental rights, free expression, and mounting evidence about adolescent mental health. [HS/College]
- Wealthy nations have a binding moral and legal obligation to fund mandatory climate-adaptation programs in the developing countries most harmed by emissions they did not produce. This topic engages questions of global justice, sovereignty, and intergenerational responsibility. [College]
- Employees whose jobs can be performed remotely have a legally protected right to request — and not be penalized for choosing — a remote or hybrid schedule. Arguments center on work-life balance, productivity research, urban infrastructure, and employer authority. [HS/College]
- Public schools and universities should guarantee students a fixed number of excused mental-health days per semester, treated identically to physical illness absences. This claim challenges the stigma around mental health and raises practical questions about academic standards and equity. [HS/College]
- The federal government should enact a comprehensive ban on the manufacture and sale of single-use plastic packaging, with a phased timeline that protects small businesses. Students can weigh environmental urgency against economic impact and examine successful international bans as evidence. [HS/College]
- The United States should abolish the Electoral College and replace it with a national popular vote to ensure every citizen's vote carries equal weight in presidential elections. This perennially contested issue is especially urgent heading into a new election cycle, touching federalism, representation, and democratic legitimacy. [HS/College]
The topics below are organized by subject. Pick one that connects to your course or something you already care about — conviction is contagious, and it is far easier to persuade an audience of something you believe yourself.
Education & Schools
- Year-round schooling improves academic achievement and should replace the traditional nine-month calendar in American public schools. [HS/College]
- Letter grades do more harm than good and should be replaced with competency-based assessments in K–12 education. [HS/College]
- College athletes at Division I schools deserve to receive a salary beyond scholarships and stipends. [College]
- Cursive handwriting instruction should remain a mandatory part of every elementary school curriculum. [HS]
- Public universities have an obligation to eliminate legacy admissions preferences in the interest of genuine meritocracy. [College]
- Financial literacy should be a graduation requirement at every American high school. [HS]
- Smartphones should be fully banned from K–12 classrooms during instructional hours. [HS]
- Community college should be tuition-free for all students who maintain satisfactory academic standing. [HS/College]
- Homeschooled students should be required to meet the same standardized testing benchmarks as public-school students. [HS/College]
- Schools should teach media literacy as a standalone course rather than embedding it in other subjects. [HS]
- The traditional five-paragraph essay format stifles critical thinking and should be retired from high-school writing instruction. [HS]
- Sex education in public schools should be comprehensive and evidence-based, not abstinence-only. [HS/College]
- Teachers deserve merit-based pay tied to professional growth rather than seniority-based salary schedules. [HS/College]
- Every high-school student should be required to complete a semester of civic engagement or community service before graduating. [HS]
- Selective magnet and gifted programs within public school systems perpetuate inequality and should be restructured. [College]
- Standardized tests such as the SAT and ACT are poor predictors of college success and should be made permanently optional. [HS/College]
- Private K–12 schools that receive public voucher funding must be held to the same accountability standards as public schools. [College]
- Schools should start no earlier than 8:30 a.m. to align with adolescent sleep biology. [HS]
- Philosophy and logic should be taught as a required subject beginning in middle school. [HS]
- Student loan forgiveness programs unfairly burden taxpayers and should be replaced with income-share agreement models. [College]
- Dress codes and school uniforms reduce socioeconomic stigma and should be adopted more widely in American public schools. [HS]
- Academic tenure at universities protects intellectual freedom and should not be abolished despite fiscal pressures. [College]
- Coding and computer science education should be treated as a core requirement on par with mathematics in secondary school. [HS/College]
- Schools that rely heavily on parent fundraising to supplement budgets deepen district inequality and should be regulated. [College]
- Bilingual education programs produce stronger long-term academic outcomes than English-immersion-only approaches. [HS/College]
Health & Wellness
- Sugary beverage taxes are an effective and justified tool for reducing diet-related chronic disease in the United States. [HS/College]
- The United States should adopt a single-payer healthcare system to ensure coverage for every resident. [College]
- Fast food companies should be legally required to display calorie and nutritional information on all menu boards and packaging. [HS/College]
- Organ donation should be an opt-out system rather than an opt-in system to increase the supply of transplantable organs. [HS/College]
- Pharmaceutical companies should be prohibited from advertising prescription drugs directly to consumers. [College]
- Physical education should be a daily, non-waivable requirement for all four years of high school. [HS]
- Flavored tobacco and vaping products should be banned outright because they disproportionately target young users. [HS/College]
- Competitive youth sports leagues place damaging levels of physical and psychological pressure on children under twelve. [HS]
- Employers should be required to provide paid sick leave to all full-time and part-time workers regardless of company size. [College]
- The federal government should fund needle-exchange programs because they reduce disease transmission without increasing drug use. [College]
- Recess should be protected from budget cuts and expanded in elementary schools because unstructured play is essential to child development. [HS]
- Healthcare providers must do more to close the racial gap in maternal mortality by adopting standardized screening protocols. [College]
- Insurance companies should be required to cover mental health treatment at the same reimbursement rates as physical health treatment. [HS/College]
- Energy drinks marketed to children and teenagers should face the same advertising restrictions applied to alcohol. [HS]
- Hospitals should be mandated to publish transparent, standardized pricing so patients can make informed financial decisions. [College]
- School cafeterias have a responsibility to offer nutritious, affordable options rather than relying on processed commodity foods. [HS]
- Cosmetic surgery procedures for patients under eighteen should be prohibited except in cases of documented medical necessity. [HS/College]
- Workplace wellness programs that offer insurance premium discounts based on biometric data unfairly penalize employees with chronic conditions. [College]
- Addiction should be treated exclusively as a public health issue, not a criminal one, and criminal penalties for personal drug use should be eliminated. [College]
- Telemedicine has proven effective enough that insurance providers should be required to reimburse it at the same rate as in-person visits. [College]
- Mandatory HPV vaccination for school enrollment is a sound public health policy that outweighs concerns about parental autonomy. [HS/College]
- Solitary confinement in prisons is a form of psychological torture and should be abolished for all incarcerated individuals. [College]
- The United States should expand community health worker programs in rural areas to address the shortage of primary care physicians. [College]
- Ultraprocessed food advertising should be banned during children's television programming because of its direct link to childhood obesity. [HS/College]
- Athletes who suffer repeated concussions deserve long-term medical coverage funded by their sport's governing organizations. [HS/College]
Technology & Social Media
- Tech companies should be held legally liable for algorithmically amplified content that demonstrably incites violence. [College]
- Net neutrality rules must be restored to prevent internet service providers from creating a tiered, pay-to-play web. [HS/College]
- Facial recognition technology should be banned from use by law enforcement until robust legal frameworks are established. [College]
- Influencer marketing aimed at children under thirteen should be classified as deceptive advertising and strictly regulated. [HS/College]
- The gig economy business model exploits workers and should be subject to the same labor protections as traditional employment. [College]
- Parents who share extensive personal content about their minor children on public social platforms are compromising those children's privacy and consent. [HS/College]
- Autonomous weapons systems should be banned under international law before they are deployed at scale. [College]
- Browser data collected without explicit user consent should be inadmissible in legal proceedings and unsellable to third parties. [College]
- Public schools should teach students how recommendation algorithms work so they can critically evaluate their own information diets. [HS]
- Right-to-repair legislation should require electronics manufacturers to make parts and repair manuals available to independent technicians and consumers. [HS/College]
- Deepfake technology used to fabricate a real person's likeness without consent should be treated as a civil rights violation. [College]
- Cryptocurrency mining's energy consumption is environmentally indefensible and should be subject to the same carbon taxes as fossil fuel industries. [College]
- Smart home devices that continuously record household audio represent an unacceptable surveillance risk regardless of manufacturer privacy policies. [HS/College]
- Publicly funded research should always produce open-access publications rather than being locked behind expensive academic journal paywalls. [College]
- Automakers should be required to install distracted-driving detection systems in all new vehicles sold in the United States. [HS/College]
- Social media platforms should be required to provide researchers independent access to engagement data in the public interest. [College]
- Video game loot boxes that use randomized rewards constitute a form of gambling and should be regulated accordingly. [HS/College]
- Employers should be prohibited from monitoring employees' personal devices, even when those devices are used for occasional remote work. [College]
- Digital literacy should be tested and certified as part of high-school graduation requirements rather than treated as optional enrichment. [HS]
- Streaming platforms that use autoplay features by default are deliberately engineered to foster excessive screen time and should disable autoplay as the default setting. [HS/College]
- Predictive policing software encodes existing racial biases and should be discontinued by every law enforcement agency currently using it. [College]
- The "right to be forgotten" — the ability to request removal of personal data from search engines — should be enshrined in American law. [College]
- E-sports should receive the same institutional recognition and scholarship funding from universities as traditional varsity athletics. [HS/College]
- Tech giants that acquire small competitors primarily to eliminate competition should face mandatory antitrust review before any merger is approved. [College]
- Every student should have the right to affordable, high-speed internet access because digital equity is now inseparable from educational equity. [HS/College]
Environment & Animals
- Factory farming causes such severe animal suffering that it should be phased out and replaced with regenerative and humane agricultural practices. [HS/College]
- The United States should invest aggressively in public transit infrastructure as a more effective emissions-reduction strategy than promoting electric vehicles alone. [College]
- Trophy hunting of endangered species should be banned globally, even when hunting operators claim to fund local conservation. [HS/College]
- Nuclear energy must be part of any credible plan to decarbonize the American electricity grid within the next two decades. [College]
- Corporations responsible for significant environmental contamination should bear the full cost of remediation rather than passing it to taxpayers. [College]
- Wild animals should never be kept as personal pets, regardless of whether the practice is currently legal in a given state. [HS/College]
- Urban green space — including parks and community gardens — should be treated as essential infrastructure, not a luxury amenity. [HS/College]
- The Endangered Species Act should be strengthened, not weakened, because biodiversity loss threatens long-term human food security. [College]
- Ocean plastic pollution is severe enough to justify holding manufacturers financially responsible for the end-of-life disposal of their plastic packaging. [HS/College]
- Zoos can no longer justify captivity for charismatic megafauna and should transition fully to sanctuary and rehabilitation models. [HS/College]
- Deep-sea mining poses irreversible ecological risks that outweigh its economic benefits and should be placed under an international moratorium. [College]
- Governments should prioritize funding for public land conservation over subsidies for extractive industries operating on federal land. [College]
- Animal testing for cosmetic products is ethically unjustifiable given the availability of validated non-animal alternatives and should be federally prohibited. [HS/College]
- Coastal communities facing repeated catastrophic flooding should receive federal relocation assistance rather than repeated disaster-relief rebuilding funds. [College]
- Grass-fed and pasture-raised livestock farming, when properly managed, can sequester carbon and deserves recognition in federal agricultural policy. [College]
- Fast fashion is an environmental catastrophe and consumers, not just manufacturers, have a moral responsibility to change their purchasing behavior. [HS/College]
- The use of wild-caught fish as feed in aquaculture operations undermines the sustainability claims of the farmed-salmon industry. [College]
- Every state with significant agricultural water use should implement mandatory water metering and conservation targets to address aquifer depletion. [College]
- Circuses and entertainment venues should be permanently prohibited from using live wild animals in their performances. [HS]
- Light pollution in and around cities is a serious ecological threat to nocturnal wildlife and should be addressed through municipal lighting ordinances. [HS/College]
- Rewilding programs that reintroduce apex predators to ecosystems produce measurable ecological benefits that justify the conflicts they create with local ranchers. [College]
- The environmental impact of a product should be disclosed on its label in the same way that nutritional information is required on food packaging. [HS/College]
- Greenwashing — marketing products with false or misleading environmental claims — should carry the same legal penalties as false advertising. [HS/College]
- Governments should subsidize plant-based protein research and production at the scale currently devoted to livestock agriculture. [College]
- National parks should limit annual visitor numbers to protect ecosystems from the accelerating damage caused by over-tourism. [HS/College]
Society & Culture
- Standardized beauty ideals promoted by the fashion industry cause measurable psychological harm to adolescents and must be regulated through mandatory diversity requirements. [HS/College]
- The nuclear family model should no longer be treated as the default social unit in public policy because modern family structures are equally valid. [HS/College]
- Cultural appropriation of minority traditions by dominant-culture industries causes genuine harm and warrants public accountability beyond mere social criticism. [College]
- Participation trophies in youth sports undermine children's ability to develop resilience and should be eliminated from competitive programs. [HS]
- Multilingual education in immigrant-heavy communities strengthens national cohesion rather than threatening it. [HS/College]
- Religion's declining influence in Western public life has weakened communal bonds that secular institutions have not yet adequately replaced. [College]
- Gentrification of urban neighborhoods destroys irreplaceable cultural ecosystems and must be constrained by enforceable community-benefit agreements. [College]
- Arranged marriages, when entered freely and without coercion, deserve the same social respect granted to self-selected romantic partnerships. [HS/College]
- The glorification of "hustle culture" is a socially destructive myth that sacrifices well-being in service of capitalist productivity norms. [HS/College]
- Statues and public monuments honoring figures complicit in historical atrocities should be removed from civic spaces and relocated to museums. [HS/College]
- Class distinctions in the United States are more rigid than Americans acknowledge, and pretending otherwise prevents meaningful social reform. [College]
- The decline of third places — libraries, parks, community centers — is eroding American civic life more than political polarization is. [College]
- Gender-reveal parties reflect and reinforce harmful binary gender norms and should be abandoned as a cultural ritual. [HS]
- Voluntourism does more to comfort wealthy visitors than to help the communities it claims to serve and should be replaced by direct financial aid. [HS/College]
- American consumer culture's obsession with convenience has produced a generation incapable of tolerating necessary discomfort. [HS/College]
- Affirmative action in university admissions is a morally justified remedy for systemic inequity rather than a form of reverse discrimination. [HS/College]
- The romanticization of rural life in popular media unfairly distorts policy conversations about urban investment and infrastructure. [College]
- Childlessness by choice is a legitimate and socially valuable life path that deserves to be free from cultural stigma and political pressure. [College]
- National service programs — whether military or civilian — should be mandatory for all citizens at age eighteen to build cross-class solidarity. [HS/College]
- The English-only movement in the United States is rooted in cultural anxiety rather than practical necessity and should be rejected. [HS/College]
- Excessive celebration of celebrity culture distracts the public from civic engagement and should be consciously resisted at the individual and institutional level. [HS]
- Colorism within minority communities is an underexamined form of discrimination that warrants the same serious public discourse as racism. [College]
- The stigma attached to mental illness in many immigrant and diaspora communities costs lives and must be dismantled through culturally targeted outreach. [College]
- Publicly shaming individuals on social media for minor social transgressions is a disproportionate response that produces no lasting social good. [HS/College]
- Wearing culturally significant garments — headscarves, turbans, Indigenous regalia — in the workplace is a protected form of identity expression that employers must accommodate. [HS/College]
Government & Law
- The Electoral College is an outdated institution that systematically distorts democratic representation and should be abolished in favor of the national popular vote. [HS/College]
- Gerrymandering of congressional districts is so corrosive to democratic legitimacy that its remedy should be placed entirely in the hands of independent, nonpartisan commissions. [HS/College]
- Mandatory minimum sentencing laws have failed to reduce crime while producing mass incarceration and must be repealed. [College]
- Lobbying by corporations and industry groups should be banned from legislative processes because it converts democracy into a marketplace for policy. [College]
- The voting age should be lowered to sixteen because adolescents are already subject to taxation and civic obligations that entitle them to political representation. [HS/College]
- Police departments should be required by law to carry their own liability insurance for misconduct, shifting financial accountability away from taxpayers. [College]
- Capital punishment is an irreversible act that a just government should never be permitted to carry out, regardless of the severity of the crime. [HS/College]
- Term limits for all federal legislators would reduce entrenched power and restore responsiveness to constituents. [HS/College]
- Solitary confinement as practiced in American prisons constitutes cruel and unusual punishment and should be abolished. [College]
- Automatic voter registration for all citizens upon reaching age eighteen is a necessary step to close the participation gap between wealthy and low-income Americans. [HS/College]
- The filibuster in the U.S. Senate has become a tool for obstruction rather than deliberation and should be eliminated or fundamentally reformed. [College]
- Undocumented immigrants who have resided in a country for more than a decade and maintained no criminal record should be granted a legal pathway to citizenship. [HS/College]
- Qualified immunity for law enforcement officers shields misconduct more than it protects good-faith policing and should be eliminated through federal legislation. [College]
- Drug addiction should be treated exclusively as a public health matter rather than a criminal justice issue, with prosecution replaced by treatment mandates. [HS/College]
- The minimum wage should be indexed to inflation so that Congress can no longer allow its real value to erode through legislative inaction. [HS/College]
- Corporate tax avoidance through offshore shelters is a form of civic theft and should be prosecuted with the same rigor applied to individual tax fraud. [College]
- Allowing private, for-profit corporations to operate prisons creates perverse incentives for mass incarceration and must be prohibited by law. [HS/College]
- Citizens United v. FEC should be overturned because treating corporate financial contributions as protected free speech corrupts democratic elections. [College]
- Juvenile offenders tried as adults receive sentences disproportionate to their neurological and moral development and should remain under juvenile jurisdiction. [HS/College]
- A universal basic income is a more efficient and dignifying poverty-reduction mechanism than the current patchwork of means-tested welfare programs. [College]
- All federal judges, including Supreme Court justices, should serve fixed terms rather than lifetime appointments to limit undemocratic concentrations of judicial power. [College]
- Ranked-choice voting should replace plurality voting in all U.S. elections because it more accurately captures voter preferences and reduces polarization. [HS/College]
- Reparations for the descendants of enslaved Americans are a legally grounded and morally necessary policy response to documented, government-sanctioned harm. [College]
- Surveillance programs that collect citizens' data without individualized warrants violate the Fourth Amendment and should be permanently dismantled. [College]
- Compulsory voting, with a formal "none of the above" option, would produce a more representative electorate without coercing ideological conformity. [HS/College]
Ethics & Personal Choices
- Individuals who consume factory-farmed meat bear a genuine moral responsibility for the suffering it causes and cannot ethically disclaim that responsibility. [HS/College]
- Physician-assisted dying is a compassionate and morally defensible option that competent adults facing terminal illness have the right to choose. [HS/College]
- Lying to protect someone's feelings is not a morally neutral act; honesty, delivered with kindness, is always the more ethical choice. [HS]
- Wealthy individuals who accumulate fortunes beyond any reasonable personal need have a binding moral obligation to redistribute a substantial portion of that wealth. [College]
- Ghosting — ending a relationship by cutting off all contact without explanation — is a form of emotional cruelty that adults should refuse to practice. [HS/College]
- Choosing to have children in a world of severe resource scarcity and climate risk is a decision that now carries genuine ethical weight requiring deliberate justification. [College]
- Organ donation should be opt-out rather than opt-in because the lives that would be saved constitute a compelling ethical claim on default policy. [HS/College]
- Excessive self-disclosure on social media is not merely a personal quirk but a habit that damages relationships and undermines the self worth examining and correcting. [HS]
- Purchasing fast fashion with full knowledge of its labor and environmental costs is an ethically compromised choice that individuals should actively work to change. [HS/College]
- Parents who raise children without any religious or moral framework do not provide "freedom of choice" — they abdicate a fundamental formative responsibility. [College]
- Civil disobedience against unjust laws is not only morally permissible but morally required when all lawful channels of protest have been exhausted. [HS/College]
- Keeping exotic animals as pets is always ethically indefensible, regardless of how humanely the owner believes they are treated. [HS]
- Euthanizing a terminally ill pet rather than pursuing aggressive, expensive intervention is a morally courageous act of compassion rather than abandonment. [HS/College]
- Accepting unearned privileges without acknowledging or working to dismantle them makes an individual complicit in the systems that produce inequality. [College]
- Whistleblowing on an employer engaged in illegal or harmful activity is a moral duty that supersedes contractual loyalty and professional self-interest. [College]
- Serial networking for purely transactional purposes, without genuine mutual regard, is a form of interpersonal dishonesty that corrodes professional culture. [College]
- Adults who choose not to vote forfeit their moral standing to complain about electoral outcomes. [HS/College]
- Conspicuous philanthropy — donating publicly for reputational benefit — is ethically inferior to anonymous giving and should be discouraged culturally even when legally permissible. [College]
- Parents should not impose their own dietary choices, such as strict veganism, on young children who are unable to give informed consent. [HS/College]
- Revenge is never a morally satisfying or productive response to injustice; pursuing it reliably causes more harm to the avenger than to the target. [HS]
- Using artificial intelligence to write personal correspondence fundamentally misrepresents the writer's effort and constitutes a subtle but real form of deception. [HS/College]
- Choosing willful ignorance about the supply chains behind everyday consumer goods is an ethical failure, not a personal prerogative. [College]
- Individuals who spread unverified information online bear personal moral responsibility for its consequences, even when they did not originate it. [HS/College]
- No ethical framework can convincingly justify the hoarding of life-saving medications by pharmaceutical speculators during a public health crisis. [College]
- Forgiving someone who has wronged you is ultimately an act of self-interest rather than altruism, making it a personal obligation rather than an optional gift. [HS/College]
Media, Sports & Entertainment
- Sports organizations that knowingly allow athletes to compete through concussions are complicit in long-term neurological harm and should face legal liability. [HS/College]
- The 24-hour news cycle incentivizes sensationalism over accuracy and has done more to inflame public opinion than to inform it. [HS/College]
- Hollywood's continued practice of casting able-bodied actors in disabled roles deprives disabled performers of opportunity and misrepresents disability to mass audiences. [College]
- Paying college athletes a salary is a matter of basic labor fairness given the billions in revenue their performances generate for universities. [HS/College]
- Reality television's exploitation of emotionally vulnerable participants for entertainment is an ethically indefensible production practice that audiences should actively reject. [HS/College]
- Video game loot boxes targeting minors are a form of predatory gambling and should be regulated identically to slot machines. [HS/College]
- Newspapers and magazines that print corrections in obscure, brief notices after publishing prominent front-page errors are failing their ethical obligations to readers. [College]
- The sports-industrial complex's glorification of extreme physical sacrifice encourages young athletes to make medically dangerous choices they are too young to evaluate. [HS/College]
- Algorithmic content recommendation systems on streaming platforms are narrowing cultural taste rather than expanding it, with serious long-term consequences for artistic diversity. [College]
- Professional athletes who use their public platforms to advocate for political causes are exercising a legitimate form of civic speech that organizations have no right to suppress. [HS/College]
- The film rating system in the United States is inconsistently applied, systematically penalizing sexual content far more harshly than graphic violence in ways that reveal skewed cultural values. [College]
- Sports franchises that leave cities after receiving taxpayer-funded stadium subsidies should be legally required to repay those public funds. [College]
- Parasocial relationships with online influencers are not a trivial cultural curiosity but a growing mental health concern that platforms have a duty to address. [HS/College]
- Journalism that relies entirely on anonymous sources without independent corroboration should not be published, because it undermines the credibility of the entire profession. [College]
- Esports deserves the same institutional recognition, scholarship funding, and campus resources as traditional varsity athletics. [HS/College]
- Sponsored content that is not clearly and prominently disclosed constitutes deceptive advertising, regardless of how minor the compensation was. [HS/College]
- The practice of "rebooting" beloved film and television franchises without meaningful creative innovation is a symptom of an industry that has chosen profit over artistry. [HS]
- Sports commentary that obsessively focuses on female athletes' appearance rather than their performance perpetuates discrimination and should be called out as a professional failure. [HS/College]
- Paparazzi photography that invades celebrities' private lives and those of their minor children should be treated as a form of harassment subject to criminal sanction. [College]
- Streaming services that release entire seasons of television at once undermine the communal, cultural conversation that episodic weekly viewing historically generated. [HS/College]
- Major sporting events such as the Olympics consistently produce white-elephant infrastructure that burdens host cities financially for decades and should adopt permanent host sites. [College]
- Music streaming royalty rates are so low that they constitute systematic exploitation of working musicians and must be restructured through legislative intervention. [College]
- Docu-series that reconstruct traumatic crimes in graphic detail for entertainment purposes retraumatize victims' families without producing meaningful social value. [HS/College]
- Performance-enhancing drug use in professional sports should be regulated and legalized under medical supervision rather than banned outright, since prohibition has clearly failed. [College]
- Children under thirteen should be legally prohibited from appearing in monetized social media content, because their parents' consent cannot substitute for their own capacity to evaluate long-term reputational consequences. [HS/College]
Persuasive Speech Topics
A persuasive speech topic operates under fundamentally different constraints than a persuasive essay topic. When you write an essay, your reader can pause, reread a dense paragraph, and follow a chain of citations across multiple pages. An audience listening to a speech gets one pass — no rewind button, no footnotes, no time to sit with a complex argument. The best persuasive speech topics are therefore narrower and more visceral than essay topics: they tap into emotions an audience already carries into the room, they unfold in a logical sequence easy to track by ear, and they arrive at a concrete call to action — something the listener can actually do before the week is out. Think of a good speech topic not as a question to be analyzed but as a case to be won in the time it takes to drink a cup of coffee. For a full walkthrough of structure and delivery, see our guide to writing a persuasive speech.
- Why you should donate blood at least once a year [HS/College]
- It's time to make mental health days as accepted as sick days in schools [HS]
- Why every student should learn basic personal finance before graduating high school [HS]
- It's time to ban smartphones from middle and high school classrooms [HS/College]
- Why you should become an organ donor today [HS/College]
- It's time for colleges to eliminate legacy admissions preferences [College]
- Why your community needs a mandatory youth voting initiative for local elections [HS/College]
- It's time to treat fast fashion as an environmental emergency [HS/College]
- Why every high school should require a course in media literacy [HS]
- It's time to end unpaid internships at for-profit companies [College]
- Why you should talk to your family about end-of-life wishes now, not later [College]
- It's time for your campus to adopt a genuine food-waste reduction program [College]
- Why we should require financial transparency from nonprofit organizations [College]
- It's time to stop glorifying overwork and hustle culture [College]
- Why your school should adopt a restorative justice approach instead of zero-tolerance suspension policies [HS]
- It's time to make CPR training a graduation requirement for every high school student [HS]
- Why you should delete at least one social media platform for thirty days [HS/College]
- It's time for municipalities to invest in safe cycling infrastructure rather than more parking lots [HS/College]
- Why every college student should complete at least one semester of community service [College]
- It's time to hold social media companies legally liable for algorithmic harm to minors [HS/College]
- Why you should adopt a pet from a shelter rather than buy from a breeder [HS/College]
- It's time for schools to replace traditional letter grades with competency-based assessments [HS/College]
- Why local news deserves your financial support right now [College]
- It's time to normalize gap years as a legitimate path between high school and college [HS]
- Why you should keep a physical voter registration card and use it every single election [HS/College]
If you want to adapt any of the essay topics discussed above into a speech, follow one reliable three-step formula: open with a single, specific story — a real person, a real moment — that makes the issue concrete before you've named it; compress your argument to two or three sharp points, each one short enough to fit on a sticky note, because an audience cannot hold seven claims in working memory; and close on the ask, a precise, doable action that takes the emotional energy you've built and channels it somewhere — a website to visit, a conversation to start, a vote to cast. The story earns attention, the points earn agreement, and the ask earns the speech its reason for existing.
Worked Examples: From Topic to Thesis to Outline
Persuasion is not a single move — it is a family of moves, each suited to a different audience, occasion, and goal. A policy brief demands careful logic; a commencement speech demands emotional resonance; an ethics essay demands a principled weighing of competing goods. The seven examples below show how choosing the right persuasive structure shapes everything that follows: the thesis you can credibly claim, the evidence you need to gather, and the order in which you deploy your argument.
Example 1: Why Are American Students Falling Behind in Reading? [High School / Introductory College]
Persuasive structure: Problem-Solution — name a concrete harm, propose a single focused fix, then demonstrate the fix is workable. Logos carries most of the weight; the argument is built on evidence of the problem and evidence that the solution has worked elsewhere.
Thesis: Because chronic underfunding of school library programs directly suppresses student literacy rates, Congress should restore and expand federal per-pupil library funding as the most efficient lever for closing the reading-achievement gap.
Outline:
- Establish the harm with evidence. Present data on declining reading proficiency across grade levels; connect those declines specifically to schools that have cut library staff and resources, isolating the library variable from other causes so the reader cannot dismiss the problem as too complex to address.
- Diagnose the root cause. Trace the funding timeline — explain how federal budget shifts pushed library spending onto local property taxes, which created a resource gap between wealthy and low-income districts and made the problem structural rather than accidental.
- Propose the single, targeted solution. Argue for a restored and indexed federal library-funding line item; be specific about amount, distribution formula, and accountability metrics, because vagueness lets opponents call the plan naive.
- Demonstrate the fix is workable. Draw on states or districts that maintained or increased library funding to show measurable literacy gains, then pre-empt the cost objection by comparing the expenditure to the long-term economic cost of a semi-literate workforce.
Example 2: We Cannot Wait — The Youth Mental-Health Crisis Demands Action Now [High School Speech / Civic Context]
Persuasive structure: Call-to-Action / Emotional Appeal — this is framed as a speech. Pathos drives the structure; the speaker builds felt urgency through narrative and imagery before issuing a direct, concrete ask. Logic is present but subordinate to emotional momentum.
Thesis: The spike in adolescent anxiety and depression is not a distant statistic but a crisis unfolding in our own schools and families, and every one of us in this room has the immediate power to demand that our school board fund a counselor for every two hundred and fifty students.
Outline:
- Open with a human story, not a number. Describe — with permission or composite detail — what a school day looks like for a teenager managing untreated anxiety: the physical symptoms, the isolation, the academic collapse. Put the audience inside the experience before they can intellectualize it away. This is the speech's emotional engine.
- Widen the lens just enough to show scale. Move from the individual to the community: acknowledge that this student's story is not exceptional, that counselors in the district are each carrying caseloads far beyond professional guidelines, and that the gap between need and available support is growing. Introduce one or two clear figures — not a wall of data, but enough to confirm that emotion is tracking reality.
- Make the audience feel their own agency. Shift the emotional register from grief to possibility. Remind the audience of past moments when community pressure produced school-board action. Name the specific meeting date, the agenda item number, the three-minute public-comment slot that is already open to them. Remove every excuse for passivity.
- Issue the direct ask and close with a returning image. State plainly: show up, sign the petition, bring one other person. Then close by returning to the opening student's story — but end it differently, with the counselor who would have been there if the community had acted sooner. Leave the audience holding both the loss and the choice.
Example 3: Should the United States Adopt Ranked-Choice Voting in Federal Elections? [College / Policy Writing]
Persuasive structure: Policy Proposal — argues that a specific policy should be adopted, prioritizing logos: legal feasibility, empirical precedent, and systematic rebuttal of practical objections. Emotion is largely absent by design; credibility comes from rigorous neutrality of tone.
Thesis: Ranked-choice voting should replace the current plurality system in all federal elections because it demonstrably reduces spoiler-candidate distortion, incentivizes less negative campaigning, and better reflects the actual preference distribution of the electorate.
Outline:
- Define the policy precisely and explain what problem it solves. Describe exactly how ranked-choice voting works mechanically, then identify the specific defect in plurality voting — the spoiler effect — that it corrects. Precision here is crucial: vague policy proposals invite vague attacks.
- Build the empirical case using existing implementations. Survey jurisdictions that have used ranked-choice voting in consequential elections and assess measurable outcomes: ballot exhaustion rates, campaign tone, voter satisfaction scores, and representational accuracy. Treat this evidence as the load-bearing pillar of the argument.
- Address constitutional and logistical feasibility. A policy proposal that ignores implementation dies in committee. Discuss the constitutional room for states and Congress to alter electoral mechanics, estimate transition costs, and explain how ballot design and voter education challenges have been handled elsewhere.
- Systematically rebut the three strongest objections. Tackle voter confusion, the cost of implementation, and the argument that the current system, despite flaws, produces stable governance. Engage each objection honestly — concede what is true in it, then explain why the evidence still favors the proposal.
Example 4: Privacy Versus Public Safety — Which Value Should Guide Surveillance Law? [College / Ethics]
Persuasive structure: Comparative-Values — both privacy and public safety are genuine goods; the essay does not dismiss one but argues that when they collide in the context of domestic surveillance law, one value must take precedence and explains why. Logos and moral reasoning share the work equally.
Thesis: Although public safety is a compelling state interest, privacy should function as the default constitutional value constraining domestic surveillance because a government that can monitor its citizens without individualized suspicion inevitably chills the speech and association on which democratic self-governance depends.
Outline:
- Grant genuine weight to both values before choosing between them. Open by articulating the strongest possible case for each value on its own terms — why safety matters morally, why privacy matters morally — so that when the essay picks a side, the reader understands the choice is a real sacrifice, not a dismissal of one value as trivial. This move signals intellectual honesty and is the structural heart of a comparative-values argument.
- Identify the specific collision point. Narrow from abstract values to the concrete legal question: suspicion-less bulk data collection by domestic intelligence agencies. Define what "default" means in constitutional interpretation and why the baseline setting of a legal system has outsized practical consequences.
- Argue why privacy should be the default, not safety. Present the key principled reason: the chilling-effect dynamic, supported by historical and sociological evidence, showing that pervasive surveillance measurably suppresses political dissent, minority organizing, and journalism — activities that are the lifeblood of democratic accountability. This is not a claim that safety does not matter; it is a claim about which value produces worse damage when it yields.
- Show that making privacy the default does not make society defenseless. Explain how individualized warrants, judicial oversight, and targeted surveillance can protect public safety without mass collection, thereby demonstrating that the values are not in zero-sum competition — only bulk, suspicion-less surveillance is foreclosed.
Example 5: Social Media Is Making Teenagers Lonely — Or Is It? [High School / College]
Persuasive structure: Concession-and-Refutation — the essay begins by presenting the opposing view on its own terms and at its strongest, grants what is genuinely true in it, and only then overturns the central claim. This structure is ideal when the opposing position is widely held and reasonable-sounding; dismissing it would cost the writer credibility. Logos dominates, but the fair-minded opening builds ethos.
Thesis: While heavy passive social-media use is legitimately associated with increased loneliness in adolescents, the causality critics assume runs in the wrong direction — loneliness drives high-volume passive scrolling, not the reverse — which means restricting platforms will not solve the underlying social disconnection that predates them.
Outline:
- State the opposing view fairly and completely — do not caricature it. Present the critics' case: correlational data linking screen time to loneliness and depression, the documented comparison mechanisms of social platforms, the testimony of adolescents who report feeling worse after browsing. Make this section good enough that a critic would recognize it as an accurate representation of their position. Anything less and the subsequent refutation is hollow.
- Concede the part that is true. Acknowledge explicitly and without hedging that passive high-volume use — scrolling without interacting — does correlate with worse mood outcomes, and that platform design features exploit psychological vulnerabilities. This concession is not weakness; it is the move that earns the reader's trust for what follows.
- Introduce the refutation: reverse causality. Present the longitudinal and experimental evidence suggesting that pre-existing loneliness and social anxiety predict later heavy passive use, rather than the reverse. Explain why correlational studies cannot establish the direction critics assume, and why experimental studies that temporarily remove platforms show limited mood improvement in already-lonely users.
- Draw the implication. If the causal arrow runs from loneliness to heavy scrolling, then platform restrictions treat a symptom while the disease — weakened in-person social infrastructure, housing density, extracurricular defunding — goes untreated. Redirect attention toward the social conditions that generate isolation in the first place.
Example 6: Why You Should Trust the Science on Ocean Acidification — And What It Demands of Us [College / Environmental Writing]
Persuasive structure: Ethos / Credibility-Led — the writer's first task is to establish why the reader should trust the underlying science before arguing what should be done about it. This structure is appropriate when the audience is skeptical of expertise or has been exposed to conflicting claims. Ethos does the foundational work; logos builds on it once trust is secured.
Thesis: The scientific consensus on ocean acidification rests on independently replicated chemistry that any informed reader can evaluate, and that consensus obligates policymakers to treat carbon-emission reduction as a non-negotiable condition of ocean ecosystem survival.
Outline:
- Establish the credibility of the evidence base before making any policy claim. Walk the reader through the chemistry of CO₂ absorption and carbonate saturation in plain language — not to condescend, but to demonstrate that the mechanism is observable, measurable, and has been confirmed by researchers across dozens of countries using independent methodologies. Show the reader how to evaluate the evidence rather than simply telling them to trust institutions. This is the essay's foundational ethos move.
- Distinguish scientific consensus from policy consensus. Acknowledge clearly that while the chemistry is settled, the policy responses are legitimately debatable — different nations, industries, and communities face different trade-offs. This distinction protects the writer's credibility: conflating "the science is clear" with "there is only one policy answer" is the error that makes skeptical audiences dismiss environmental arguments wholesale.
- Leverage established credibility to make the policy argument. Having built trust, now argue: because the acidification trajectory is chemically predictable and the collapse of carbonate-shelled marine organisms would cascade through global food systems, emission reduction is not one option among several but a necessary condition. Ground this claim in the same evidence the reader has already been shown how to assess.
- Address the trust gap directly. Name the reason many readers arrived skeptical — a documented history of industry-funded research distorting public understanding of environmental science — and explain how to identify the difference between funded advocacy and independent peer review. Closing this loop reinforces ethos and leaves the reader with a durable tool, not just a conclusion.
Example 7: Is Free College Worth the Cost? A Consequence-Based Case [College / Society and Culture]
Persuasive structure: Consequence / Cost-Benefit — the argument does not appeal primarily to rights, fairness, or emotion, but to a rigorous accounting of likely outcomes. Every major claim is framed as a projected result, and the essay's persuasive power comes from demonstrating that the aggregate payoff — economic, social, and fiscal — exceeds the aggregate cost. Logos is the exclusive currency here.
Thesis: Publicly funded tuition-free community college, financed through a targeted tax on financial transactions, would produce economic returns — in workforce productivity, reduced public-assistance expenditure, and tax-revenue growth — that exceed its implementation cost within two decades, making it not a spending program but a long-term fiscal investment.
Outline:
- Establish the full, honest cost — do not minimize it. State the estimated annual expenditure of tuition-free community college clearly, explain the proposed funding mechanism (financial transaction tax), and acknowledge the transition costs and administrative overhead. A cost-benefit argument that lowballs costs destroys its own credibility; the reader must believe the cost figure is real before the benefit comparison means anything.
- Quantify the direct economic benefits. Calculate the projected increase in workforce credential attainment and its estimated effect on individual earnings, employer productivity, and aggregate GDP contribution. Cite comparable program outcomes from states or countries with subsidized two-year college access. Convert these gains into dollar figures so they can be placed on the same scale as the costs.
- Quantify the indirect fiscal benefits — the ones critics ignore. Model the reduction in spending on public assistance programs that correlates with increased educational attainment, the reduction in incarceration rates linked to better employment outcomes, and the growth in tax revenue generated by a higher-earning workforce. These second-order effects are where the cost-benefit case typically wins or loses, and they must be made explicit and sourced.
- Conduct the comparison and state the payoff timeline honestly. Present the break-even point — the year at which cumulative economic returns are projected to surpass cumulative expenditure — and acknowledge the uncertainty range around that projection. A consequence-based argument that pretends to certainty it cannot have is dishonest; a consequence-based argument that shows its work, including its limits, is persuasive.
Ready to move from topic to draft? Once you have chosen a topic and a stance, our thesis statement generator can help you crystallize your central claim, and the AI writing assistant can help you outline and structure your argument or speech.
Frequently Asked Questions About Persuasive Essays & Speeches
How do I write a persuasive essay?
Start with a strong hook and a clear thesis statement that declares your position in the introduction. Build each body paragraph around one supporting argument backed by evidence, facts, or examples, and address counterarguments to strengthen your credibility. Close with a conclusion that restates your thesis and ends with a compelling call to action.
What makes a good persuasive essay topic?
A good persuasive essay topic is debatable, meaning reasonable people can genuinely disagree about it, so avoid topics with obvious or universally accepted answers. It should be specific enough to argue thoroughly within your word limit yet broad enough to find solid supporting evidence. Topics you feel strongly about also tend to produce more convincing, passionate writing.
What is the difference between a persuasive essay and a persuasive speech?
A persuasive essay is a written piece where structure, word choice, and cited evidence do most of the convincing, and readers can pause and re-read at their own pace. A persuasive speech relies on vocal delivery, eye contact, pacing, and audience interaction to reinforce the message in real time. Both share the goal of changing minds, but a speech must be engaging the moment it is heard, leaving no chance for the audience to review it later.
How do I choose a persuasive speech topic?
Pick a topic you genuinely care about, since your enthusiasm will come through in your delivery and keep the audience engaged. Make sure the topic is relevant to your specific audience so they have a personal stake in being persuaded. Narrow your focus to one clear, arguable claim rather than a broad issue so you can make a powerful case within your allotted time.
How is a persuasive essay different from an argumentative essay?
A persuasive essay uses emotional appeals, personal anecdotes, and rhetorical techniques alongside logic to win the reader over to your viewpoint. An argumentative essay relies primarily on logic, documented evidence, and a balanced examination of counterarguments, keeping an objective, academic tone throughout. In short, persuasive writing targets the heart as well as the mind, while argumentative writing targets mainly the mind.
How do I end a persuasive essay or speech?
Restate your thesis in fresh wording to remind the audience of your central position without simply repeating your introduction. Briefly summarize your strongest supporting points to reinforce why your stance is correct. Finish with a clear call to action—tell your audience exactly what you want them to think, feel, or do—so the conclusion leaves a memorable and motivating impact.
Conclusion
Ultimately, you should be writing about persuasive essay topics that interest you. In this article, we tried to give you some ideas about what to write about no matter what class you are taking. If you are taking an English composition class and the instructor has asked you to pick any subject, remember to start with what you know.
Sometimes you will be assigned a persuasive essay topic you know nothing about. Don't worry! You can always seek help from a writing tutor online or in person. Even subjects you know little about can become interesting when you do enough preliminary research and find out why and how you can persuade the reader. Alternatively, you can start doing research now on the subject so that you get to know all sides of the issue. With the best tools, writing a persuasive essay is not as hard as you think, and it can even be fun.
The most important thing to remember as you walk away from this guide is that persuasion is a skill — and like every skill, it improves with deliberate practice. Every persuasive essay you write makes you sharper at identifying strong topics, building specific theses, deploying rhetorical devices effectively, and anticipating the reader's objections. Whether your immediate goal is to pass an assignment, improve your GPA, or simply become a clearer thinker, the investment you make in learning to write persuasively will pay dividends for the rest of your academic and professional life. Now go find a topic you care about, take a clear position, and make your case.
Get help with your essay
Browse 130,000+ paper examples, use our AI writing assistant, generate citations and outlines — all included.
Sign Up Now →