Considering what you have now learned about the legal system of the United States, what characteristics of the legal system do you think facilitates business activity? How do these characteristics of the legal system facility business activity? Please write an essay not less than 500 words explaining your answers to these questions.

?What should be the relationship between Christians and the legal system??

Numerous biblical verses discuss this issue in some manner, but most of them are susceptible to multiple plausible interpretations and applications. Students will read and digest the biblical text related to this issue, then offer their own reflections and interpretations in paper at least 1000 words in length.

I need an essay for the class of Legal Systems of Asia and Africa which has to be 1200 words and is referenced (OSCOLO).
I will send you some sources, there are two which must be used, I will put starts at the beginning of the name of the requisite sources. However, i made lots of search i will send you all of them, you can use the ones that you think it would be helpful for the essay.
One of the legal transplant must be Turkey, you can choose the second one but please do not use US. Thank you very much
There are faxes for this order.

prepare a presention to a class of police recruits explaining the foundation of our legal system and where laws come from including the various types of crimes and their classifications

the legal system in the U.S.

Yes, I would like you to write the essay as it has to specify some knowlege in legal system in Congo as a lawyer.This is a requirement for my admission in a master degree in human right program. I have a bachelor degree in Law school and I am candidate seeking admission in a master degree.
Here is a link of a web-site that you can use to add to your knowlege. It's about a legal system in Congo.
http:www.nyulawglobal.org/Democratic_Republic_Congo.htm
or you can just google.

My request is to write " An essay in English of 5 typewritten pages,describing an aspect of your country's legal system"

If you have any question, feel fre to get back to me.
I never used your service. I am running after the deadline.
I hope to be satisfy with your service.

Instructions
THE ENGLISH LEGAL SYSTEM.
ESSENTIAL READING TEXTBOOK.
WILSON,S MITCHELL,R,STOREY,T.AND WORTLEY.N (2011),ENLISH LEGAL SYSTEM,DIRECTIONS(2ND EDITION,OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS)

QUESTIONS,
1,WHAT IS MEANT BY THE TERM ENGLISH LEGAL SYSTEM.
2,WHAT ARE THE KEY LEGAL INSTITUTIONS THAT MAKE UP ENGLISH LEGAL SYSTEM?
3,DESCRIBE THE ROLE OF THESE INSTITUTIONS
4,EXPLAIN THE ROLE OF EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE
5,DESCRIBE THE ROLE OF EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
6,EXPLAIN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE AND THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
7,WHAT ARE THE IMPACT OF AND THE ADVANTAGES OF A WIDER INTERNATIONAL LEGAL SYSTEM?
8,HOW INPORTANT WAS THE CREATION OF THE SUPREME COURT ON 01/10/2009?

Topic
THE ENGLISH LEGAL SYSTEM. ESSENTIAL READING TEXTBOOK. WILSON,S MITCHELL,R,STOREY,T.AND WORTLEY.N (2011),ENLISH LEGAL SYSTEM,DIRECTIONS(2ND EDITION,OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS) QUESTIONS, 1,WHAT IS MEANT BY THE TERM ENGLISH LEGAL SYSTEM.

How can the American legal system, which is so devoted to protecting individual rights, justify itself morally if it jeopardizes, through its own rules, the right of law-abiding citizens to personal peace and security.
4 page essay unplagiarized. Will get a 0 if more than 10% plagiarized.

Please just use web sites not books

The paper should explain how the novel Smilla's Sense of Snow portrays the prejudice of the Danish legal system towards Greenlanders. It should describe whether or not the novel gives an accurate description of the Danish legal system during the time of the novel, which is the late 20th century. The thesis should also argue how the factuality affects how the text is interpreted.

Thus, the thesis should include three things: 1. how the novel depicts the Danish legal system 2. whether this depiction is accurate 3. how the accuracy affects the reader's perspective of the novel.

There should be a minimum of one quotation per body paragraph. Quotes should come from the novel Smilla's Sense of Snow as well as at least two other academic sources.

1. Identify the sources of law n the English Legal System, and account for the development of equity as a source of Law. (500 words)

2. Explaine, using relevant case aw, how the European Court of Justic have maintained a uniform interpretation of Community Law across European States. (500 words)

3. Following from question 2 (above), explain, using relevant case law, the approach of the UK courts/judiciary to community law. (500 words)

Work must be referenced and footnoted
You need to use 2 different books as a source.

In the beginning, the student is encouraged to be able to see the "forest, before seeing the trees." To that end, students are required to review at least two resources that give an overview of the legal system in the United States. While there is no one perfect source, the internet is filled with plenty of resources that give students an insight and relatively good understanding of the structure and workings of the US legal system.

One such resource is http://www.america.gov/publications/books//outline-of-u.s.-legal-system.

Students are required to review at least two resources that explain the current US legal system and submit to the professor a two or three page outline of same, noting the resources consulted.

Prepare a 800 to 1,050 word paper in which you discuss the role of the U.S. Constitution and the U.S. legal system in business regulation. Find and discuss a recent news story, or an example from your workplace, which demonstrates how a Constitutional right affects a business and how the legal system (either court system or administrative system) is used with respect to recognizing and/or protecting that right. Be sure to cite at least two references.

If you use an electronic source, include the URL.

APA Style format


General Format for Research Papers
General Guidelines
These guidelines are adopted from APA Guidelines.
Your essay should be typed, double-spaced on standard-sized paper (8.5" x 11") with 1" margins on all sides. You should use 10-12 pt. Times New Roman or Arial font or a similar font.
Major Paper Sections
Your essay should include four major sections: the Title Page, Abstract, Main Body, and References.
Title Page
The title page should contain the title of the paper in quotation marks, the author's name, the institutional affiliation, the name of the course, and the name of the Instructor.
Type your title in upper and lowercase letters centered in the upper half of the page. It is recommended that your title be no more than 12 words in length and that it should not contain abbreviations or words that serve no purpose. Your title may take up one or two lines. All text on the title page, and throughout your paper, should be double-spaced.
Beneath the title, type the author's name: first name, middle initial(s), and last name.
Beneath the author's name, type the institutional affiliation, which should indicate the location where the author(s) conducted the research.
Beneath the institutional affiliation, type the name of the Instructor.

You are the resident expert on legal and ethical framwork at your childcare centre. A new staff member has started at the centre and you have been asked to give her a quick lesson on legal and ethical issues within the centre. Prepare a document that will cover the following areas
*Note this is a childcare centre based in south australia

- overview of the legal system
- types of law
- importance of ethics in practice
- strategies for addressing common ethical issues
- how to work within legal and ethical framworks
- principles and practices of confidentiality

5 page research paper on the influence natural law has had on the American Legal System. This paper should be in APA format with all sources properly cited and accompanied with a bibliography. Research paper should contain an "interesting" thesis statement. Paper should discuss what natural law is, who were some of the significant natural law theorists, how did their theories of natural law differ, and how were these theories incorporated into the American legal system. Please include a minimum of 3 quotes. Of the minimum of 4 sources only one source can be from an Internet cite.

From the Syllabus:

Soviet law: The law of the former communist countries (USSR, Poland, Yugoslavia, etc.). Law is viewed as an instrument of public domination controlled by the upper classes. The best law is no law at all. A system strongly biased by Marxist ideology, where the legal rule is committed to the "will of the people".

The assignment will be a report on one of the following legal system Soviet Law. Your sources can include the text, but must also include two (2) other sources. You are to describe the earliest origins of your legal system and also describe the latest developments in the legal system.

Word Length: 2,000 (plus or minus 10% allowable- including quotes and in-text refencing, but excluding reference list.)
Description: This essay will explore, critique and demonstrate your understandings of key concepts and issues relating to Justice and the Australian Legal System. You have a choice of 3 topics, from which you have to choose one.
The following groups are examples of people who may be disadvantaged in their encounters with the law:

1. Indegenous Australians; OR
2. Women; OR ***** I have chosen WOMEN-MIGRANT WOMEN as my topic!*****
3. Migrants

Choose ONE of these 3 groups. DESCRIBE what changes in the law by way of reform of the law; changes in attitude of the judiciary; precedent law; or by any other means these groups have been subjected to. You are required to critically assess whether those changes have improved their encounters with the law. You may use Australian Cases as examples.

Assessment Criteria:
*Demonstration of knowledge: a systematic presentation of relevant knowledge addressing the nature and scope of the question posed.
*Demonstration of understanding: a logical application and evaluation of relevant knowledge to the assignment question.
*Demonstration of academic research skills: evidence of sound research and accurate and appropriate referencing of sources.
*Demonstration of academic wwriting skills: appropriate and effective structuring of arguments, clarity of expression and correct use of grammar, punctuation and spelling.

This essay is concerned with ONLY the Australian Legal System, the scope of the essay is MIGRANT WOMEN.

Please refer to journal articles they are much more to the point.
I will be uploading the Justice and Legal Studies Handbook for this subject that the essay for. It sets everything out in detail regarding the writing style and referencing and intext referencing reqired for this particular subject.

Thank-you and i hope i have been clear in what i have written.

Kind regards,

Claudia David
There are faxes for this order.

Consider the following passage from the speech of Lord Hope of Craighead in "A v Secretary of State for the Home Department" [2005] UKHL 71:

Answer the questions printed below it.

This is the background to the ratification by the United Kingdom of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment which was adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 10 December 1984 and entered into force on 26 June 1987. The Convention was designed to provide an international system which denied a safe haven to the official torturer. But long before it was entered into state torture was an international crime in the highest sense, as Lord Browne-Wilkinson pointed out in R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, Ex p Pinochet Ugarte (No 3) [2000] 1 AC 147, p 198G. The rule set out in article 15 of the Convention about the use of statements obtained by the use of torture must be seen in this light. Article 15 provides:
"Each State Party shall ensure that any statement which is established to have been made as a result of torture shall not be invoked in any proceedings, except against a person accused of torture as evidence that the statement was made."
This provision has not been incorporated into our domestic law, unlike the declaration that the use of torture is a crime wherever it was committed which was made part of our law by section 134 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988. But I would hold that the formal incorporation of the evidential rule into domestic law was unnecessary, as the same result is reached by an application of common law principles. The rule laid down by article 15 was accepted by the United Kingdom because it was entirely compatible with our own law. The use of such evidence is excluded not on grounds of its unreliability - if that was the only objection to it, it would go to its weight, not to its admissibility - but on grounds of its barbarism, its illegality and its inhumanity. The law will not lend its support to the use of torture for any purpose whatever. It has no place in the defence of freedom and democracy, whose very existence depends on the denial of the use of such methods to the executive.
Once torture has become acclimatised in a legal system it spreads like an infectious disease, hardening and brutalising those who have become accustomed to its use: Holdsworth, A History of English Law, vol v, p 194. As Jackson J in his dissenting opinion in Korematsu v United States, 323 US 214 (1944), 246 declared, once judicial approval is given to such conduct, it lies about like a loaded weapon ready for the hand of any authority that can bring forward a plausible claim of an urgent need. A single instance, if approved to meet the threat of international terrorism, would establish a principle with the power to grow and expand so that everything that falls within it would be regarded as acceptable. Without hesitation I would hold that, subject to the single exception referred to in article 15, the admission of any statements obtained by this means against third parties is absolutely precluded in any proceedings as evidence. I would apply this rule irrespective of where, or by whom, the torture was administered.
The issue for SIAC
Rule 44(3) of the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (Procedure) Rules 2003 (2003/1034) provides that the Commission may receive evidence that would not be admissible in a court of law. But I consider, in agreement with all your Lordships, that this rule is incompatible with the fundamental nature of the objection to the admission of statements obtained by the use of torture, wherever it was administered, and that it does not extend to them. That being the nature of the objection, the question whether it can be overridden and, if so, in what circumstances must be left to the legislature. This is not a matter that can be left to implication. Nothing short of an express provision will do, to which Parliament has unequivocally committed itself.
There are ample grounds for suspecting that the use of torture on detainees suspected of involvement in international terrorism is widespread in countries with whom the security services of the United Kingdom are in contact. The Secretary of State's position is that he does not rely on information that he knows has been obtained by torture, as a matter of principle. But he is willing to accept and act upon information whose origin is obscure and undetectable, in the knowledge that it may have come from countries that use torture. He says that it is for the party who objects to its use on the ground that torture was used to make good his objection. What then is the approach that SIAC should take to this issue?
(a) The burden of proof
I agree that a conventional approach to the burden of proof is inappropriate in this context. It would be wholly unrealistic to expect the detainee to prove anything, as he is denied access to so much of the information that is to be used against him. He cannot be expected to identify from where the evidence comes, let alone the persons who have provided it. All he can reasonably be expected to do is to raise the issue by asking that the point be considered by SIAC. There is, of course, so much material in the public domain alleging the use of torture around the world that it will be easy for the detainee to satisfy that simple test. All he needs to do is point to the fact that the information which is to be used against him may have come from one of the many countries around the world that are alleged to practise torture, bearing in mind that even those who say that they do not use torture apply different standards from those that we find acceptable. Once the issue has been raised in this general way the onus will pass to SIAC. It has access to the information and is in a position to look at the facts in detail. It must decide whether there are reasonable grounds to suspect that torture has been used in the individual case that is under scrutiny. If it has such a suspicion, there is then something that it must investigate as it addresses its mind to the information that is put before it which has been obtained from the security services.
(b) The standard of proof
Guidance needs to be given on this point too. Do the facts need to be established beyond a reasonable doubt or do they need to be established only on a balance of probabilities? To answer this question we must know what it is that has to be established. It is at the point of defining what SIAC must inquire into that, with the greatest of respect, I begin to differ from Lord Bingham. He says that it is for SIAC to initiate or direct such inquiry as is necessary to enable it to form a fair judgment whether the evidence has, or whether there is a real risk that it may have been, obtained by torture or not. But it is one thing if what SIAC is to be required to do is to form a fair judgment as to whether the evidence has, or may have been, obtained by torture. It is another if what it is to be required to do is to form a fair judgment as to whether it has not, or may not, have been obtained by torture.
Lord Bingham then says that SIAC should refuse to admit the evidence if it is unable to conclude that there is not a real risk that the evidence has been obtained by torture. My own position, for reasons that I shall explain more fully in the following paragraphs, is that SIAC should refuse to admit the evidence if it concludes that the evidence was obtained by torture. I am also firmly of the view that, if it approaches the issue in this way, it should apply the lower standard of proof. The liberty of the subject dictates this. So SIAC should not admit the evidence if it concludes on a balance of probabilities that it was obtained by torture. In other words, if SIAC is left in doubt as to whether the evidence was obtained in this way, it should admit it. But it must bear its doubt in mind when it is evaluating the evidence. Lord Bingham's position, as I understand it, is that if it is left in doubt SIAC should exclude the evidence. That, in short, is the only difference between us.



(a) How would you characterise the various reasons that are stated or referred to as grounds that justify banning the use of torture or of evidence obtained by torturing?

(b) In the light of the last paragraph of the quotation, comment on Lord Hopes statement that The law will not lend its support to the use of torture for any purpose whatever. Why does the issue of burden of proof matter, and which approach to this seems the more convincing, and why?

(c) Should any public authority in any circumstances have discretion, and, if so which authority and what sort of discretion, to consider admitting evidence that may have been obtained through torture in extreme circumstances of great public danger?

(d) Which if any of the theoretical approaches to legal reasoning (i.e. Formalism, Realism, H.L.A Hart's, MacCormick's, Dworkin's, etc.) do you think casts most helpful light on judicial reasoning in such a case as this. Explain.

---

The proper use of footnotes is for citation or referencing. They are not to be used to make substantive points. Such substantive points should appear in the body of the essay.

Please use only as many sources as you deem necessary. However, focus primarily on the speech.

Legal Reasoning is key.

After understanding the structure of the US legal system, the next logical step for a students to begin to learn "how to find the law." With the onset of the internet age, searching through stacks of books, periodicals, and endless piles of papers has been minimized.

The successful student will quickly learn that finding the law is as easy as knowing how to appropriately frame the question seeking an answer, and knowing where to search for that answer. The best lawyers are usually those who know how to find the law, and its variations, and then apply it to the facts of the instant case.

Two of the major resources for legal research are WESTLAW and LEXIS-NEXIS.

Westlaw is one of the primary online legal research services for lawyers and legal professionals. In addition, it provides proprietary database services that can be of great assistance to student seeking information. Information resources on Westlaw include more than 40,000 databases of case law, state and federal statutes, administrative codes, newspaper and magazine articles, public records, law journals, law reviews, treatises, legal forms and other information resources.

The second primary on line legal research engine is LexisNexis. It offers a widely used, searchable, and identically named archive of content from newspapers, magazines, legal documents and other printed sources. LexisNexis describes itself as the "worlds largest collection of public records, unpublished opinions, forms, legal, news, and business information" , and targets its products to a wide range of professionals in the legal, risk management, corporate, government, law enforcement, accounting and academic markets.

It is the understanding of the professor that students have access to a version of the LEXIS-NEXIS database created for academic libraries (Lexis-Nexis Academic). A list of Law databases available to students at Seton Hall is available at: http://academic.shu.edu/libraries/db/subject/db_sj_law.htmStudents are required to review the basic structure of both WESTLAW and LEXIS-NEXIS in order to compare each engine's opportunities. Students are also required to determine access to these sites via the SHU library website.

As the national security advisor, you have been asked by the president to prepare a report describing the major types of legal systems and legal traditions in use today. The president also asks that you describe the growing threat of transnational crime and provide an assessment of every known type of transnational activity in existence today. Write such a report for the president.



For information regarding the APA writing and formatting style, you can access some helpful hints via http://www.apastyle.org/, and the Purdue University Online Writing Lab. This site contains a simulated APA journal article, a sample paper in APA style, an FAQ about APA style, and examples of various citations.

The essay is a research study.
CRITERIA: It must show an extensive knowledge and significant understanding of relevant statute/and or case law, pertinant factual information, and legal concepts and principles. It must be logically and critically, and in detail, examine a wide range of relevant legal issues in terms of: concerns and/or problems with the current law, advantages/disadvantages experienced in other jurisdictions, proposals/arguments of major stakeholders. It must clearly explain the implications and persuasively justify valid and detailed conclusions as to the effectiveness and adequacy of alternative legal solutions, merits/weaknesses in the arguments of stakeholders, benefits/potential problems for recommendations. Information must be from a wide variety of sources. A high standard of vocabulary and fluent language must be used. In-text referencing is essential along with an extensive bibliography.
TASK: To develop a hypothesis and then write a written discussion in extended essay format.
STRUCTURE:
(Knowledge & Understanding) Introduce the hypothesis in the context of the topic. Examine the current legal position as evidenced by statute and/or case law, and show unerstaning of pertinent social and public policy aspects relative to the hypothesis.
(Investigation) Critically examine the controversies, problems and legal issues surrounding the hypothesis. Analyse the differing views, arguments and proposals of significant stakeholders and other relevant authorities. Compare and contrast the approaches taken to the issues in a range of other jurisdictions.
(Evaluation) Provide and justify personal recommendations for future legal directions, and critically appraise the potential benefits and problems from a range of different perspectives. Present a persuasive well-informed conclusion that settles the matter of the hypothesis.

I will leave it up to you to come up with a hypothesis. The focus is on the Adversarial and Inquisitorial legal systems and which is more appropriate for Australia. I am an Australian high school student so please ensure all information is relevant to Australia and the spelling is Australian. I am an A+ student so please ensure that the essay is of a high standard.

Thank you so much for your help. If you have any queries please do not hesitate to email me: [email protected] (different address from actual address to send essay)

Please compose an essay setting with the background presented below to set forth the main tenets of the two major legal systems and explain which one you would select as the preferred forum for resolving legal disputes concerning your business, and why. This assignment is intended to demonstrate the basic understanding of legal system adopted in the United States by identifying its main tenets and comparing and contrasting those with the main tenets of the other major legal system. Feel free to hypothesize whatever scenarios you wish in order to complete the assignment. This may be especially helpful in helping illustrate the features, advantages, and disadvantages of the different systems.

Here is the background:

There are two great legal traditions in the world: the Anglo-American Common Law tradition, and the Romano-Germanic Civil Law tradition. (There are others, such as the traditional Shari'a in Islamic countries and so-called Soviet law in, e.g., the People's Republic of China, but for our purposes they are of little consequence.) The Anglo-American Common Law began in England after the Norman Conquest of 1066 and developed as a body of judge-made law; the Romano-Germanic Civil Law traces its roots to the Roman Empire (technically to the days of the East Roman Emperor Justinian in the sixth century A.D., but actually going back to the Twelve Tables of the fifth century B.C. Roman Republic). Today, the Anglo-American Common Law tradition operates - more or less - throughout the world in those countries that were formerly parts of the British Empire and Commonwealth, while the Romano-Germanic Civil Law tradition operates on the European continent, in Central and South America, and in some countries that were former colonies of European (but not British) nations. There are features peculiar to each and fundamental differences between the two.

Sources to use:
Please use only trusted sources (for example: Wikepedia).

EXPLAIN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE COMMON LAW (JUDGE MADE LAW) AND THE FOLLOWING HISTORICAL SOURCES OF LAW, CUSTOM, EQUITY AND BOOKS OF AUTHORITY. DETERMINE, THROUGH THE USE OF JUDICIAL COMMENT, ACADEMIC COMMENT AND CASE LAW, WHETHER SUCH HISTORICAL SOURCES HAVE CEASED TO BE A FORM OF LAW WITHIN THE ENGLISH LEGAL SYSTEM TODAY.


Please could you use OSCOLA with footnotes.

Please write in Times New Roman 12 pt. font. This needs to discuss the the origins and characteristics of the law and legal systems of the United States, as well as the functions and fields of the system of law of the U.S. through the jurisprudence of American federal and state courts, and the constitutions and legal codes of at both the federal and state levels and how it all comes together to impact the individuals and organizations (e.g. businesses and institutions) in our society. Please discuss how modern law evolved from English common law, how courts of Equity have merged into regular civil courts and the impact of the American Law Institute and it's restatements of law have had an impact. Please mention and cite the differences between law in Louisiana under Napoleonic code and how it differs procedurally from common law jurisdictions. Please cite "Law in America - a short history" by Lawrence M Friedman, 2002, published by Modern Library, "Problems in Contract Law" by Knapp, Crystal, and Prince, 2007, 6th edition, Aspen Publishers, "Prosser, Wade and Schwartz's Torts" 2005 by Foundation Press, "Modern Criminal Law" by Wayne R. LaFave, 4th edition, 2006 Thomson West and "Law 101" by Brien Roche, 2009, Sphinx Publishing.

Codification and Liability Risk

EXPLAIN how insurance coverage is affected by the codification of the legal system in the other countries with regard to Napoleonic code versus common law.

N.B

-The content of response to this essay question is graded in terms of the accuracy, completeness and relevance of the ideas expressed.
-The form of the answer is evaluated in terms of clarity, organisation, correct mechanics (spelling, punctuation, grammar, capitalization) and legibility
-The word limit is 1000 words (+/- 10%).

LS 500 UNIT 9 ASSSIGNMENT

Discuss in a 3?4 page paper why a case may be tried in both a criminal court room and a civil court room. What are the differences between the same case in criminal court and civil court? Are the any similarities?

Analyze the following in your paper:

1.The Parties in a criminal case and a civil case.


2.The burden of proof in both criminal and civil cases.


3.Why the same defendant can be tried in both a criminal court and a civil court.


4.An ethical discussion of our legal system using a criminal case and a civil case.


Your essay should be 3?4 pages in length.

You should also make sure to:


?Include a title page with full name, class name, section number, and date


?Include an introductory and concluding paragraph and demonstrate college-level communication through the composition of original materials in Standard American English


?Use examples to support your discussion


?Cite all sources on a separate reference page at the end of your paper and cited within the body of your paper using APA format

".... the law is never static,it is always changing, being reinterpreted or redefined, as regulators and judges strive with varying degrees of success to ensure that the law constantly reflects changes in society itself" Harris P (2007)An Introduction to Law (7th edn) Cambridge UK

Analyse this quotation using the English legal system to illustrate your answer
-show knowledge of
the nature of UK law and its main sources
the ways in which UK law can change
relationship between law and social change
use examples from changes in Marriage and family laws, corporate manslaughter and the law and reproductive technology