The Da Costa ruling, however, determined that any ruling of the European Court of Justice must necessarily apply to all national courts when interpreting Community Law (Craig 2001). In this way, the law is guaranteed to be applied evenly in and in the same manner in all member nation courts when deciding Community Law issues, whereas prior to this ruling differing interpretations of the same facets of Community Law could be applied to the same issue.
It is important to note that this ruling does not affect the various national courts of the member nations of the European Union when interpreting national law, and in fact the European Union and its various courts, including the European Court of Justice, have no sway over such interpretations, as the European Union is not a true federal entity (Craig 2001). In this way, while ensuring the equitable interpretation of Community Law in all member nations and national courts, the ruling in the Da Costa case, as well as in subsequent cases, maintains the sovereign rights of the national courts when it comes to the interpretation of national or non-Community Law.
Application of Community Law in the United Kingdom
The use of Community Law by the courts in the United Kingdom and in the general practice and body of law in that nation is relatively straightforward, given some of the country's other interactions with the European Union and the general European Community. In 1972, the passage of the European Communities Act (which predates the establishment of the European Union, of course, but is still applicable -- just as the European Court of Justice was actually in existence and remained essentially unchanged since 1952) outlined the way that Community Law would be utilized and interpreted by the courts of the United Kingdom. Essentially, Community Law both present and future at the time that the Act was passed was determined to hold the status of true national law before UK courts, unlike foreign law, which could still be presented but only by a verified expert the interpretation of a specific body of foreign (e.g. French) law (Freestone & Davidson 1988).
This Act was and is also highly significant in that it deemed not only all rights listed explicitly in the terms of the various Community Treaties then in existences,...
Not only that, but the Act contains provisions that provide for the direct enforcement of these rights within the United Kingdom, thus granting full executive, legislative, and ultimately judicial (through the European Community's courts interpretations of Community Law) power concerning Community Law and rights to the governmental offices and institutions established by the Community (Freestone & Davidson 1988). Even this is not where the powers granted to the Community bodies in the development and enforcement of law in the United Kingdom by the Act ended, however.
The United Kingdom made the power of the European Court's decisions and interpretations a matter of national law, establishing in the act that decisions regarding community law made by the national courts were to adhere to he principles established by the European Courts, and of referring cases to these European Courts whenever warranted and allowable according to the terms of the Community's judicial system (Freestone & Davidson 1988). Essentially, these combined elements of the European Communities Act means that Community Law will have the direct effect in the United Kingdom that the language and subsequent interpretation of the Community Law itself provides, unmitigated by further national legislation or jurisprudence (Freestone & Davidson 1988).
Craig, P. (2001). "The jurisdiction of the community courts reconsidered." In the European Court of justice, de Burca & Weiler, eds. New York: Oxford University Press.
Freestone, D. & Davidson, S. (1988). The…
The documents we provide are to be used as a sample, template, outline, guideline in helping you write your own paper, not to be used for academic credit. All users must abide by our "Student Honor Code" or you will be restricted access to our website.
For example, the Parliament passed the "Year and a Day Rule" Act in 1996 that changed the previous murder and manslaughter law that specified that a person could be charged with murder or manslaughter if the victim died within a year and a day of receiving his injuries. The change was made to reflect modern development in medical science, which enabled injured people to remain alive for longer periods. Changes
(2007) Unilateral administrative acts are the imposition of the will of the administration upon the people of administrative law that has been "developed by doctrinal writings" (Zongwe, Butedi and Phebe, 2007) and which fall into two primary categories: 1) The first is related to unilateral administrative acts "defined in the terms of the procedure for adopting, and the administrative bodies or officials performing these acts (classification formelle); 2) The second involves unilateral
Origins and Characteristics of the Law and Legal Systems in the U.S. The Origins and Characteristics of the Law and Legal Systems in the United States The origins and characteristics of the law and legal systems of the United States It is a commonplace observation to state that the Declaration of Independence and The Constitution of the U.S. are the origin of and provide the characteristics of the legal systems of the U.S. But
This chapter is completed with further information on a legal analysis in chapter 12, which discusses the organization of the results of the research. The Honigsberg Grid is amply described as a useful instrument in such an organization. Chapter 13 presents directions as to how a memorandum of law should be written, as well as some of its most important characteristics, notably the fact that this needs to be an
A d) the theoretical approach to legal reasoning that casts the most helpful light on judicial reasoning in determining whether or not evidence derived from torture should be admissible is legal positivism, as developed by H.L.A. Hart. Hart's approach to legal positivism focused strongly on the relationship between the law and morality. One would be hard pressed to describe an area where the relationship between moral behavior and the law
The NPC, importantly, controls both legislative and judicial functions -- true to the consolidation of power in communism. When discussing the Chinese judiciary, one must understand there are no juries, only judges; and hearsay is admissible as evidence, unlike the civil tradition. However, in keeping with civil tradition, evidence obtained from documents carries more weight than oral testimony. The judge in a Chinese court is not interested in defending