Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
These efforts will help to both prevent the initial release of any biological agents within the general populace or environment, as well as effectively treat afflicted individuals and slow spread through appropriate treatments.
Once biological agents are released into the general population, the extent of disease spread and number of individuals afflicted will be significantly affected by the role and effectiveness of the government through quarantine and treatment (Cordesman; Lindler, Lebeda, & Korch). The ability to deal with the biological agent will also depend on the capacity of the government to identify the bioagent which has been utilized. Initial awareness of an attack may be observed through comparison against the background rate of infected individuals through constant surveillance and will increase the likelihood of rapidly determining the etiology of the disease outbreak (Fidler & Gostin; Ryan & Glarum; Cordesman). Depending on the agent which has been used in the attack, determination may be stymied by unremarkable initial symptoms that could be consistent with naturally occurring diseases, such as influenza or other respiratory ailments (Fidler & Gostin; Cordesman; Ryan & Glarum; Petsko).
Important steps will involve increasing public awareness of a disease outbreak without evoking general hysteria and preventing further transmission from infected individuals (Cordesman; Cole). Appropriate quarantine procedures and control of elements of the transportation system may be required. If the general populace is not aware that an outbreak is occurring, they may engage in actions that could increase their likelihood of becoming infected or further spreading disease (Cordesman; Fidler & Gostin; Ryan & Glarum).
Conclusion
With the advancement of technological innovations and spread of biological knowledge, bioterrorism represents a real and significant danger in a modern world. The capacity to acquire, weaponize, and utilize biological agents for nefarious purposes has increased dramatically and poses a significant threat against human populations (Fidler & Gostin;...
Such attacks may result in catastrophic loss of human life, widespread incidence of disease, general panic, as well as concomitant disruption of economic sectors within the country and international trade relations (Cordesman; Ryan & Glarum; Fidler & Gostin).
Given the unique capacity for widespread transmission of disease with the release of biological weapons, effective prophylactic and contingency programs are essential for dealing with this threat (Cordesman; Fidler & Gostin; Ryan & Glarum). Efforts to prevent the initial introduction of bioagents into the public sphere are the most important in dealing with biological terrorism. However, if a biological weapon is released, authorities must be trained and capable of treating infected individuals and slowing the potential spread of disease (Cordesman; Fidler & Gostin; Ryan & Glarum).
Ultimately, biological agents are dangerous because of their unique ability to continually propagate and are increasingly more accessible putative terror weapons due to their inexpensive production.
Works Cited
Cole, Leonard A. The Eleventh Plague. Macmillan, 2002. Print.
Cordesman, Anthony H. The challenge of biological terrorism. CSIS, 2005. Print.
Fidler, David P., and Lawrence O. Gostin. Biosecurity in the global age. Stanford University Press, 2008. Print.
Kortepeter, MG, and GW Parker. "Potential biological weapons threats." Emerging Infectious Diseases 5.4 (1999): 523-527. Print.
Lederberg, Joshua. Biological weapons. MIT Press, 1999. Print.
Linden, Edward V. Focus on terrorism. Nova Publishers, 2002. Print.
Lindler, Luther E., Frank J. Lebeda, and George Korch. Biological weapons defense. Humana Press, 2005. Print.
Petsko, Gregory A. "Biodefense vs. bioterrorism." Genome Biology 9.8 (2008): 108. NCBI PubMed. Web.
Ryan, Jeffrey R., and Jan F. Glarum. Biosecurity and bioterrorism. Butterworth-Heinemann, 2008. Print.
Zilinskas, Raymond A. Biological warfare. Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2000. Print.
Works Cited
Cole, Leonard A. The Eleventh Plague. Macmillan, 2002. Print.
Cordesman, Anthony H. The challenge of biological terrorism. CSIS, 2005. Print.
Fidler, David P., and Lawrence O. Gostin. Biosecurity in the global age. Stanford University Press, 2008. Print.
Kortepeter, MG, and GW Parker. "Potential biological weapons threats." Emerging Infectious Diseases 5.4 (1999): 523-527. Print.
The foolishness of this reversal of priorities would be clearly demonstrated in the contrast between the results of intelligence efforts on 9/11 and those just two years prior. After the resignation of Tenet, who submitted as his official reason for departure the desire to spend more time with his family, his spokesman noted that "no one in the U.S. government was more aggressive in calling attention to and dealing with
(Rebehn M.) Another example from the 1700's of the use of bacterial agent in war was in the conflict between Russia and Sweden in 1710. There are reports that the Russians used the bodies of plague victim to create an epidemic among the enemy. (HISTORY of BIOLOGICAL WARFARE) There is also the infamous incident in American history of the intentional infection of the native Indians with smallpox. "An English general,
In the first instance an attack of this nature usually serves a symbolic purpose from the terrorist's point-of-view in that he or she is seen to be attacking the bastion of global Western commerce. Secondly, many business concerns are more vulnerable to attack as they are usually not as heavily secured as military or energy installations. There is also the factor that American financial institutions are invariably identified with
The USA Patriot Act: This was a law that was passed after September 11th. It is giving the police and intelligence officials the power to go after terrorists organizations easier. As it lifted various Constitutional protections when investigating these offenses. Counter Terrorism: These are the activities that: federal, state and local officials are taking to prevent future terrorist attacks. Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD): These are weapons designed to inflict large amounts
Militarization of Police The 21st century has provided in a very short time, major changes to the way society interacts and operates. Governmental structures and institutional principles have also greatly swayed in recent decades. It is apparent that the world is drastically changing and evolving into a new form of culture and society that presents many problems and issues, especially in cases of the law and law enforcement. The law is changing
Rational choices are limited in this setting, and may merely consist of making the best of the worst available alternatives. The American public is becoming increasingly frustrated with national policymakers who seem to be firing global broadsides but are not able to hit anything. In fact, Butler even questions whether the war on terrorism is a struggle against Osama bin Laden, his Al Qaeda network, and a few similarly minded