Civil Tort Criminal Law Differences Essay

PAGES
2
WORDS
746
Cite

Civil vs. Criminal Law Goals

The American justice system differentiates between civil (tort) and criminal law, with the most significant distinction being that the state generally has the authority to prosecute crimes but not torts, while individuals have the power to directly bring civil but not criminal charges. The goals of a criminal case are to determine the guilt or innocence of the accused, but also to uphold the tenets of the law, protecting the public safety and in many cases offering some form of victim restitution to promote principled justice (“The Difference Between Torts and Crimes,” 2004).

Players

The distinction is due to the perception that crimes are affronts to the state, and require no individual plaintiff. On the other hand, tort law covers contracts between parties and not between one party and the state. The general public represented by a jury plays a part in criminal but not civil cases.

Commencement

Commencement procedures differ significantly in civil versus criminal cases. In a criminal case, the state initiates the prosecution of the crime, and bears the burden of proof. The defendant’s rights are protected under Constitutional law. In a civil case, the plaintiff must prove there...

...

When brought to trial, criminal cases must include a jury as per Constitutional law. On the other hand, civil cases are more typically resolved out of the courtroom as with mediation, or alternatively, heard by a judge but not a jury. A defendant in a civil case is also not entitled to an attorney, as one is in a criminal case (“The Differences between a Criminal Case and a Civil Case,” n.d.). Because the state is not prosecuting a civil case, the defendant’s rights are not protected under Constitutional provisions.
Outcomes and Remedies

Breach of contract in civil law, such as negligence, often results in deleterious outcomes, even death. Yet the burden of proof in civil cases is generally lower than for criminal cases due to the more severe potential outcomes of the latter and the broader ethical principles at stake when defining criminal law. Outcomes may include incarceration or rehabilitation with the goal of promoting public safety or offering victim retribution through community service. In a civil case, the plaintiff will likewise seek restitution…

Cite this Document:

"Civil Tort Criminal Law Differences" (2018, September 05) Retrieved April 25, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/civil-tort-criminal-law-differences-essay-2172724

"Civil Tort Criminal Law Differences" 05 September 2018. Web.25 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/civil-tort-criminal-law-differences-essay-2172724>

"Civil Tort Criminal Law Differences", 05 September 2018, Accessed.25 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/civil-tort-criminal-law-differences-essay-2172724

Related Documents

Acceptance must be made by an intended party to the contract and must be understood by the offerer before he withdraws or retracts the offer. And consideration is some forebearance on the part of both sides to make a contract enforceable. For instance, a simple promise is not enforceable. However, when a grandfather promises to pay his grandson $5 for every 'A' in school, and the grandson agrees, there is an

Employment Law Is as Important as Knowledge of Criminal Law to the Security Manager EMPLOYMENT LAW IS AS IMPORTANT AS CRIMINAL LAW The role of a security manager requires diversity; they are required to oversee a department in order to reduce theft, fraud and make sure an organization's assets are well protected. At the same time, the managers enforce the company's policy and procedures. Mostly, the managers are expected to wear

Jurisdiction is not simply of the personal variety; when attempting to sue someone, one needs to find someone who has both personal jurisdiction over them as well as subject matter jurisdiction. All states have for the most part, given their courts a broad form of subject-matter jurisdiction so that their citizens will be free to try a wide variety of cases in their courts. However, the defining detail is that

If there is ever a case where the courts cannot determine what the original intention of the parties was, the country with the most logical connection to the contract is often chosen as the country of law for deciding the dispute. The place of performance of the contractual duties; the place of residence of the contractual parties; the nature of the subject matter of the contract -- all of

Business Law The Differences between Civil Law and Criminal Law: To a layman who is not familiar with the various concepts of Law, criminal Law may be more familiar because of intense interest in criminal cases that are tried in courts of law and the resulting media coverage. Civil law however, is quite an unknown subject. The differences between the two are many. In criminal law, the government generally files the litigation

Criminal Procedure
PAGES 12 WORDS 3499

Crime Control/Procedures The term "play in the joints" refers to flexibility within the law that allows for a certain amount of discretion to occur within the prosecution and judge. Even though there is discretion within the manner in which the Judge may interpret sentencing, procedure and rulings, there are still formal rules of law that provide for a basis for upholding the Constitution. In a given situation, for example, the Judge