Even though Matthew 8:23-27 and Mark 4:36-41 describe the same event in the life of Christ, each does so in a slightly different manner from the other. The two writers place emphasis on specific words or ideas, which is unique to their own writing and does not reflect on the other. Yet, the two go together and show a dependency of thought that supports the notion that the two were not conceived independently of one another. The reasons that the texts appear similar and yet dissimilar at the same time are that 1) the audience of the two gospels were different; 2) the writing styles of the two differed; and 3) the context of the two gives each its own special significance that makes it unique. This paper will argue for dependence of one upon the other with respect to the gospels of Matthew and Mark and explain why they are different.Clearly the two gospels are telling the same story of Christ calming the storm. Yet each does so in a unique way. Part of the reason this is so is that the two writers had a different audience in mind when they composed their gospels. Matthew was writing for a Jewish audience while Mark was writing for a gentile audience. Matthew uses the name of Jesus in verse 23, whereas mark does not use the name at all. Matthew uses the name “Lord” when the disciples call out “Lord, save us!” whereas Mark has the disciples call out “Teacher,” and ask him in a less dramatic tone...
For the Gentiles, Mark saw that they used reason to approach the divine: they wanted logical steps towards God and thus Mark conveys this dramatic scene with more logic than drama. For the Jews, however, their entire history and culture is shaped by dramatic events and they undoubtedly had more of an appreciation for the dramatic, which is why Matthew provides this type of drama and connects it to the name of Jesus: he wants his Jewish audience to appreciate the dramatic way in which Christ was sent to save them. He does this by having Christ bring up the subject of faith: “Why are you fearful, you of little faith?” (Matthew 8:26). Mark, on the other hand, simply shows Christ addressing the sea to “be muzzled” (Mark 4:39), an indication to the Gentile reader of the power that Christ has over nature.
Second, he must attempt to present good doctrine. Contrary to what some may suggest, these first two goals are not identical -- merely by translating from the page to the screen what the gospels describe happening would not explain the theological significance of the events, as Jesus is rather too busy being executed to have much time to explain his purpose of salvation in those chapters -- this purpose
Jesus warns not just Peter but all of "them" about not boasting about the messiah in Mark, Matthew, and Luke too. Jesus's warning comes immediately after the miraculous healing of the blind man (Mark 8:30; Matthew 16:20; Luke 9:21). Interestingly, the Gospel of Matthew is more emphatic about Peter's future role as the "rock" of the Church of Christ: "And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this
There are seven letters by Paul and it is accepted that they were written by Paul, but no one knows clearly who wrote the rest. A critical enquiry into all this started only in the 18th century as there was no critical study of the matter. The accepted authorship of Paul is regarding the Epistles to Romans, First to Corinthians, Second to Corinthians, to Philippians, to Galatians, to Thessalonians
Gospel of John was written already after the disciple's death in the first century CE. It was time when there was coming a vivid schism in Christianity teaching, as Christian philosophy was influencing changes caused by the impact of Gnosticism of Greeks, and it was time when some Christian religious leaders rejected the Devine mission of Christ. In gospel, John comes to the original language used by Jesus Christ,
Much literary criticism assumes that the gospels are not necessarily historical or else it plays down theological or religious context. However, these assumptions are not inherent in the method; a well-crafted piece of historical writing also promotes certain ideological concerns in an artistic and aesthetically pleasing (Bloomberg)." Now that we have garnered a greater understanding of the climate of Israel at the time of Jesus Christ and the criticisms that
Synoptic Gospels: A Comparison of John and the Synoptic Gospels A Comparison of John and the Synoptic Gospels: The Synoptic Gospels A Comparison of John and the Synoptic Gospels Matthew, Mark, Luke (Synoptic Gospels) John Significant Narratives These cover some important episodes in Jesus; life and ministry that are notable excluded from John. These include the institution of the Lord's Supper (Matt 27: 17-25; Luke 22: 7-14; Mark 14: 12-20), the Transfiguration (Matt 17: 1-13;
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now