Constructivist theory is one of the theories of the international relations emerged in the 1990s posing a challenge to the dominant liberal and realist theoretical paradigms. By taking different theoretical approaches to viewing the international systems, constructivist theory emphasizes on the material objects "rather than the mere existence of the objects themselves". (Cristol, 2011 p 1), for example, nuclear weapons in North Korea, and the United Kingdom may be identical materially, however, they possess different meaning to the US policy makers. Moreover, constructivists place a greater emphasizes on identity, norm development and idealist powers than other theoretical paradigms in international relations.The objective of this paper is to discuss the theory of constructivism with reference to the international relations.
Neo-realists believe that the major aspects of international politics are based on the structural hierarchy of the international systems. The neo-realists also point out that international systems are primarily based on anarchy because they lack overarching authority. Moreover, the international system composes of the unit of state, formally equal, and enjoy sovereignty over their territories. Neo-realists believe that state can only rely on oneself for security, and defend their national and self-interests. However, a constructionist such as Wendt, (1992), challenges the assumption of realists on the ground that state can achieve security through a social interaction and cooperation.
Slaughter, (2011) takes a different approach to understanding the concept constructivism stating that constructivism is not a theory rather it is an ontology showing a set of assumption about the agency, human motivation and the world. The author believes that constructivism is not similar to liberalism, institutionalism, or realism rather the theory is rationalism. According to the constructivist perspectives, military power, international institutions, domestic preferences and trade relations are not important in the international politics since they have social meaning. Constructivists also believe that power relations among states should be a mixture of norms, ideas, and believe to understand the dynamic state behaviors. For example, nuclear arsenal between China and the United Kingdom may be comparatively destructive, however, the United States will translate different meaning to this nuclear armament. In the international relations, China acts on the realist assumption and do not act on the objective structure of international systems. Although, states may pursue self-interests, they will also pursue wealth, power, and survival. Thus, constructivism argues that social norms and international cooperation are the major tenets of the international politics. Contrary to other theories of international relations that focus mainly on states as the major actors of international relations, constructivism emphasizes the role of non-state actors such as transnational corporations, and NGO (Non-governmental organizations) because they can alter the state behaviors through persuasions, lobbying and shaming. Constructivism also identifies international bureaucracies as the critical entities that pursue their interests through human rights protection and free trade against wishes of the states, which created them.
Additionally, the post-cold war discourse in international relations offers various approaches to understanding the international system. The constructivist theory has been identified as one of the examples of international relations theories revealing the dynamic of world politics. The constructivist's theory focuses on the materialists and neorealism that reveals on the distribution of power that includes economic capabilities, and military forces. (Hurd, 2008). Constructivists theory also explains the state behavior and balance of power between states. (Nugroho, 2008).
After the collapse of Soviet Union and fall on Berlin in Wall, there was a change…
International Relations Theory and United Nations Peace: International Relations (IR) field normally focuses on the study of how various state systems can be made to work more efficiently to improve the power of law, maintain order, manage interstate affairs peacefully, and lessen prospects of war. The word relation in this field is used to denote the inclusion of more than political affairs to aspects like conflict and peace. International relations field
Politics International Trade-Offs In international policy, as in the course of daily human life, self-interested actors must carefully weigh competing and often equally valid choices, and make for themselves some compromise between opposed values. It seems that as often as one is able to solve a problem, one notices that the very solution causes problems of its own. An unmitigated good is difficult to find even in one person's individual life, and
This form of Wilsonian idealism has been somewhat tempered by a more contemporary reformulation of idealism, social constructivism. " While is has shed the normative mantle of idealism, social constructivism does emphasize that social actors act not only according to their selfish interest, as in realism…but also in response to shared values and norms. Social constructivism therefore stresses that the creation of international institutions in general and international organizations
Politics International Relations Analysis of Theories The field of international relations is based on many competing and complementary theories. These include realism, liberalism, constructivism, dependency theory, Marxism, etc. The theories are many; the field is expansive. What international relations seek to do is both formulate and analyze international politics, and work concomitantly with world governments, non-governmental organizations, and multi-national corporations. Due to the nature of work in these global affairs, several of the
S. fails to consider the inmates as war prisoners, and does not allow them to defend themselves against the charges brought, is a complete breach of the Geneva Conventions. At the same time, statements such as Donald Rumsfeld's consideration that the prisoners of Afghanistan are unlawful combatants and do not enter the category of prisoners of war is simply a means of establishing a legal niche that would allow the
Feminism and International Relations Tickner discusses Morgenthau's 'six principles of political realism', refuting the notion that international politics is a realistic, masculine domain. Tickner offers a feminist perspective on Morgenthau's theory. She believes that the fundamental flaw in Morgenthau's article is that it is defined by masculinity. She argues that men are overrepresented in the upper levels of international politics, specifically the realms of the military, diplomacy, and science. Women are