Criminal Justice - Affirmative Action Thesis

One of the primary justifications for affirmative action in higher education has been that the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) and other similar tools used to determine academic potential at the college and post-graduate level reflect a cultural bias in their makeup that benefits non-minorities. Even to whatever extent that may have been true when affirmative action programs were first conceived, opponents of affirmative action in education point out that the appropriate solution to that situation is to simply reconfigure the tests rather than to continue using the same flawed tests and then overcompensate after the fact (Halbert & Ingulli, 2007). In education in particular, one of the effects of affirmative action in admissions is that it harms those minority students who would have qualified for admission without any artificial assistance. Specifically, public awareness of affirmative action in college admissions means that even the most highly qualified students of minority persuasion will be subjected to assumptions that their hard-earned academic credentials mean less than they would otherwise, because affirmative action programs in education taint their accomplishments.

In principle, the affirmative action concept was sound, because it sought to rectify a traditional form of social inequality and prejudice against members of minority races, ethnicities, and gender. In many respects, continued mechanisms...

...

However, the specific methods of mandating a specific number of openings be reserved for minorities and of reducing performance standards on objective measures of talent, skill, and aptitude within the relevant criteria for employment is a flawed manner of achieving a worthwhile objective.
Legislative efforts to reduce discrimination in the workplace and in education must focus on the front end by providing equal educational and other social opportunities as early as possible in life rather than on the back end by requiring changes in hiring and college admissions criteria. Improving the chances of disadvantaged individuals to overcome challenges early in life so that they have an equal chance to compete for vocational and educational opportunities is a much better approach than affirmative action policies in their traditional format.

Bibliography

Halbert, T., Ingulli, E. (2007). Law & Ethics in the Business Environment. Cincinnati: West Legal Studies. Healey, J.F. (2003). Race, Ethnicity, Gender, and Class: The Sociology of Group Conflict and Change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge.

Schaefer, R.T. (2002). Racial and Ethnic Groups. New York: Harper Collins.

Schmalleger, F. (2008). Criminal Justice Today: An Introductory Text for the 21st Century. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Sources Used in Documents:

Bibliography

Halbert, T., Ingulli, E. (2007). Law & Ethics in the Business Environment. Cincinnati: West Legal Studies. Healey, J.F. (2003). Race, Ethnicity, Gender, and Class: The Sociology of Group Conflict and Change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge.

Schaefer, R.T. (2002). Racial and Ethnic Groups. New York: Harper Collins.

Schmalleger, F. (2008). Criminal Justice Today: An Introductory Text for the 21st Century. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.


Cite this Document:

"Criminal Justice - Affirmative Action" (2009, February 08) Retrieved April 25, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/criminal-justice-affirmative-action-24990

"Criminal Justice - Affirmative Action" 08 February 2009. Web.25 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/criminal-justice-affirmative-action-24990>

"Criminal Justice - Affirmative Action", 08 February 2009, Accessed.25 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/criminal-justice-affirmative-action-24990

Related Documents

Criminal Justice in Action: The American prison system has throughout the years developed to become home to the increasing population of the nation's criminals. The increasing population of these criminals in the American prison system is due to the fact that incarceration has always been used even in cases where alternative punishment would be adequate. Furthermore, this growing population of inmates is due to sentence disparities that include both long and

Criminal Justice: On September 18 at around 2:30 PM, the victim, a famous citizen in the community was assaulted and robbed of his wallet by the defendant on his way home. The victim was not only assaulted but he was also pushed against his car and threatened with a knife. The crime generated huge media attention because of the victim's popularity as calls for speedy arrest and conviction of the criminal

Criminal justice administration mainly focuses on crime prevention and punishing any illegal activities. Criminal justice administration is wide and it entails law enforcement and the judicial administration. Some of the jobs that relate to criminal justice administration include; security coordination, juvenile delinquency administration, law enforcement and being a courtroom official. Additional crime is also part of criminal justice administration. This field entails terrorism prevention, immigration policies and social policies. Other

Criminal Justice System: Ethics in Criminal Procedure Ethics refers to the principles of morality that govern an individual's behavior. Ethics, therefore, provides the basis through which an individual defines, and distinguishes between the good and the bad. This implies that it is ethics that provides the framework for the duties and responsibilities an individual owes to himself, and to the community. Today, ethics define how corporations, professionals, and individuals relate with

D.). Armed robbery is an offense carried out while in possession of a drawn weapon like gun despite of whether it was fired or not. Plea negotiation or bargaining is usually conducted in order to lessen trial expense and involves the provision of a lesser sentence by the prosecutor in exchange for admission of guilt. Pre-trial conference involves discussions between the defense, prosecutor, and judge to ascertain the need for

" (Weinstein, 2003) This range is dependent upon the charges that are brought against the defendant in the criminal case as well as "some aspects of the conduct underlying the charges." (Weinstein, 2003) Judges are legally required to "impose a specific sentence is subject to the exercise of discretion in two areas" which are those of: 1) the judge makes the determination that the sentence must be within the Guideline range;