Direct patrol methods and implementation

Criminal Justice

Direct Patrol

Direct patrol is completely directed and predetermined patrol of specific "hot spots" of known and difficult criminal activity. It is different from traditional patrol because the patrol officers engage in very specific functions designed to prevent crime before it occurs. It involves much more research and planning than traditional patrols, and it may utilized other types of patrols, such as foot or bicycle patrols geared to certain outcomes or topography.

Sherman, Gartin, and Buerger argue against random patrols because of their very random nature. They maintain that crime itself is random, and randomizing patrols can make the desired results even more random. They maintain that even in the largest cities, there are hot spots of criminal activity, and by using directed patrols geared specifically to the crimes that commonly occur in these hot spots, it is easier to prevent and control crime. The authors' study of criminal activity in Minneapolis indicates that most of the criminal activity, and even specific types of activity, happened in particular locations in the city, and even at specific addresses within those areas, such as bars. Thus, directed patrols directed specifically at that bar, especially during peak periods, could help lower and prevent crime from occurring.