Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
FTC and Price Fixing
Price Fixing
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) sued Brown & Toland Medical Group, for allegedly "fixing the prices and terms under which its doctors would contract with payors to provide services for preferred provider organization (PPO) enrollees." (Federal Trade Commission, 2004). In 2001, Brown & Toland and some of its physician members formed a PPO. Brown & Toland began negotiating reimbursement rates on behalf of those members. In addition, Brown & Toland directed the physicians to terminate preexisting contracts and forbade them from accepting prices other than the ones determined by Brown & Toland.
In 2003, the FTC filed an administrative complaint alleging that Brown & Toland organized a horizontal agreement under which its physicians agreed collectively on the price and other significant terms on which they would enter into contracts. Furthermore, the FTC contended that this horizontal agreement raised prices for physician services in San Francisco.
Brown & Toland entered into a settlement agreement, which prohibited it "from negotiating with payors on behalf of physicians, refusing to deal with payors, and setting terms for physicians to deal with payors - unless the physicians are clinically or financially integrated" (Federal Trade Commission, 2004). In addition, any contracts that were illegally obtained were to be terminated. However, Brown & Toland could continue to negotiate with payors on behalf of physicians if such action was "reasonably necessary to the formation of a 'qualified risk-sharing joint arrangement' or a 'qualified clinically-integrated joint arrangement,' as defined by the order." (Federal Trade Commission, 2004). Therefore, the settlement was aimed only at limiting behavior that prevented the member physicians from freely contracting with the payors, and not at behavior that reflected actual financial or clinical relationships between member physicians.
Works Referenced
Federal Trade Commission. (2000). Nine West settles state and federal price-fixing charges.
Retrieved November 1, 2005 from Federal Trade Commission. Web site: http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2000/03/ninewest.htm
Federal Trade Commission. (2004). San Francisco's Brown and Toland Medical Group settles price fixing charges. Retrieved November 1, 2005 from Federal Trade Commission.
Web site: http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2004/02/browntoland.htm.
In addition, within 30 days of the order's final date, notify with a copy of the order by first-class mail or electronic mail with appropriate return receipt/confirmation, every physician who participated in IPAMG since January 1, 2005, every physician who intends to become a member, every current IPAMG officer, director, manager and employee, and every payor with whom IPAMG has a contract. Furthermore, existing contracts may be terminated by
Antitrust Investigation: Google It was reported in 2011 that the 'Wall Street Journal' reported that the FTC was preparing a major antitrust investigation into Google's core search advertising business. Specifically stated by the Wall Street Journal was: "The new FTC investigation . . . will examine fundamental issues relating to Google's core search advertising business, which still accounts for the overwhelming majority of its revenues. Those will include whether Google --
Even non-chiropractic patients would be hurt, as the costs might be passed onto all users of all components of the health insurance plans who were being effectively extorted for money. The ultimate settlement that emerged prohibited the WCA "from fixing prices for any chiropractic goods or services, or the terms of third-party payer contracts," which seems more than fair and reasonable -- it seems overly lenient given the damage that
Federal Trade Commission ruled on charges of anti-trust leveled against the Wisconsin Chiropractic Association. The WCA and its executive director, Russell A. Leonard, had been charged with organizing a conspiracy among members of the WCA, which represent 90% of the chiropractors in Wisconsin, of conspiring to force health care providers to pay higher rates for chiropractic services than they had previously paid. According to the proceeding records (FTC, 2003) and
Antitrust and Intellectual Property Antitrust Law Remedies in Intellectual Property Cases In any research paper it is important to first define the terms used prominently in order to make sure that the reader understands what is being said. In this case, the two terms that require definition are antitrust and intellectual property. According to a definition from Cornell University Law School "Trusts and monopolies are concentrations of economic power in the hands
U.S. laws There are a number of different laws that govern fair, balanced and competitive practices. One major category is the antitrust laws. Antitrust laws seeks to create a competitive environment by preventing companies from obtaining the ability to abuse their market positions. Ensuring that each industry and market has a healthy amount of competition has been the work of a series of acts that govern antitrust practices. The most significant piece