Generic Vs. Name Brand Drugs Thesis

Length: 7 pages Sources: 6 Subject: Medicine Type: Thesis Paper: #35104972 Related Topics: Fda, Pharmacy, Branding, Pharmaceutical Industry
Excerpt from Thesis :

309).

The abbreviated approval process authorized by Hatch-Waxman lets generic drug manufacturers use the same clinical data that the original manufacturer used to obtain FDA approval, thereby avoiding these expenses. In this regard, Greene emphasizes that, "Whereas the pioneer drug manufacturer must incur great expense and undergo rigorous scrutiny when it files an new drug application (NDA) to secure FDA approval, a generic manufacturer may file an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) in which it may take advantage of the NDA holder's time and expense" (2005, p. 310).

The impact of the Hatch-Waxman Act on generic drug availability has been enormous. For instance, in 1984, generic drug prescriptions represented less than 20% of all prescription drugs marketed in the United States; however, due in large part to the Hatch-Waxman Act, by 1996, the market share for generic drugs had increased to 43% and by 2006, as many as 63% of all prescriptions in the United States were for generic equivalents (Kesselheim, 2006). Moreover, Abramson, Harrington, Missmar, Li and Mendelson (2004 note that, "Because of price caps from insurers on brand-name products, generic drug sales now constitute a principal source of operating revenue for most retail pharmacies" (p. 26). Given the proliferation of generic equivalents for name-brand drugs, a reasonable concern relates to whether these cheaper alternatives are as effective as their more expensive name-brand counterparts, and these issues are discussed further below.

Efficacy of Name-Brand Drugs vs. Generic Drugs

Critics of generic drugs point out that despite the fact that these medicines generally contain the same active ingredients as their name-brand counterparts, they do not always contain the same inactive ingredients which may produce different results in different healthcare consumers (Greene, 2005). Advocates of generic drugs counter that the studies to date have shown that these alternatives have "nearly always been shown to have identical therapeutic effects" (Kesselheim, 2008, p. 126). Similarly, Mossialos and his associates emphasize that, "A generic equivalent is a perfect substitute to the original brand and competes in price for market share" (p. 25). In order to qualify as a "perfect substitute," generic drugs must satisfy rigorous quality and content standards. In this regard, Dr. Gary Buehler, director of the FDA's Office of Generic Drugs, advises, "A generic drug is a copy that is the same as a brand-name drug in dosage, safety, and strength, how it is taken, quality, performance, and intended use. Generic drugs are safe, effective and FDA-approved" (2002, p. 24). Moreover, Buehler (2002) insists that generic drugs work in the same fashion as their higher-priced name-brand counterparts and require the same amount of time to become effective. Critics, though, maintain that not only are some generic drugs prepared with different inactive ingredients that may affect their efficacy, manufacturers are being unduly enriched by taking advantage of the enormous costs that were incurred in the research and development of these brand-name drugs (Greene, 2005). Furthermore, although there...

...

7). Interestingly, though, the same body of research indicates that some patients appear to respond better to generic drugs compared to their higher-priced name-brand equivalents (Fox, 2003).

Beyond the foregoing considerations, there continue to be reports concerning the inferior quality of generic equivalents that not only affect their efficacy, but their safety for healthcare consumers as well. In this regard, Tobin (2009) recently reported that the European Union recalled a number of generic drugs manufactured by the Swiss pharmaceutical company Novartis because of "serious deficiencies" in administrative protocols and production methods. The generic equivalents subjected to the recall included a generic version of the antidepressant drug, Prozac, as well as various hypertension medications, diabetes medicine and analgesics (Tobin, 2009).

Conclusion

The research showed that generic drugs are becoming increasingly available as alternatives to their higher-priced name-brand equivalents due in large part to the passage of the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984 that paved the way for generic drug manufacturers to bring their versions of name-brand drugs to market more quickly. The research also showed that as much as half of the drugs being sold in the United States today are generic equivalents. Despite these trends, the research also showed that there are some barriers to access of more generic drug equivalents that prevent healthcare consumers from receiving generic equivalents in some cases, and there are concerns about the efficacy of generic drugs compared to their name-brand equivalents despite being chemically identical except for different inactive ingredients in some drugs. There have also been reports concerning the safety of these generic equivalents that have some healthcare consumers worried that these lower-priced medicines may not be as safe as their higher-priced alternatives. Despite these concerns, though, the FDA has been adamant in its assurances that the generic drugs marketed in the United States are as safe and effective as name-brand drugs. In the final analysis, the increasing need for medicines in the future will require more generic alternatives to help satisfy the demand among a rapidly aging population. No American should have to make the difficult choice between whether to spend money on the basic needs of life such as utilities, food and rent or the medicines needed to stay alive.

References

Abramson, R.G., Harrington, C.A., Missmar, R., Li, S.P. & Mendelson, D.N. (2004). Generic

drug cost containment in Medicaid: Lessons from five state MAC programs. Health Care

Financing Review, 25(3), 25-26.

Buehler, G. (2002, September-October). Generic drugs: What you need to know. FDA

Consumer, 36(5), 24.

Fox, P.D. (2003). Prescription drug benefits: Cost management issues for Medicare. Health Care Financing Review, 25(2), 7-8.

Greene, S. (2005). A prescription for change: How the Medicare Act revises Hatch-Waxman to speed market entry of generic drugs. Journal of Corporation Law, 30(2), 309-310.

Harrison, C.S. (2004). The politics of the international pricing of prescription drugs. Westport,

CT: Praeger.

Jacquette, I. (2007). Merck Kgaa V. Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd.: Implications of the Supreme

Court's decision for the people who matter most . . . The consumer. American Journal of Law and Medicine, 33(1), 97-98.

Kesselheim, a.S.…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Abramson, R.G., Harrington, C.A., Missmar, R., Li, S.P. & Mendelson, D.N. (2004). Generic

drug cost containment in Medicaid: Lessons from five state MAC programs. Health Care

Financing Review, 25(3), 25-26.

Buehler, G. (2002, September-October). Generic drugs: What you need to know. FDA


Cite this Document:

"Generic Vs Name Brand Drugs" (2010, November 11) Retrieved June 25, 2021, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/generic-vs-name-brand-drugs-11854

"Generic Vs Name Brand Drugs" 11 November 2010. Web.25 June. 2021. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/generic-vs-name-brand-drugs-11854>

"Generic Vs Name Brand Drugs", 11 November 2010, Accessed.25 June. 2021,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/generic-vs-name-brand-drugs-11854

Related Documents
Resolving the Higher Prescriptive Drug Cost Problem
Words: 1450 Length: 5 Pages Topic: Business - Advertising Paper #: 85658337

Resolving the Higher Prescriptive Drug Cost Problem Resolving beneficiary or medical consumer issues with respect to the rapidly rising costs of drugs is a heated issue I government and in every American's living room. Not only are those living in assisted living facilities but also parents with children and the increased number of retiring baby boomers are being financially affected in significant ways. In addition those Americans without proper insurance coverage

Industry and Regulatory Strategy the Generic Drug
Words: 1238 Length: 3 Pages Topic: Healthcare Paper #: 25022845

Industry and Regulatory Strategy The generic drug industry provides the public with pharmaceutical alternatives to branded big name prescription drugs. "In 2010 alone, the use of FDA-approved generics saved $158 billion, an average of $3 billion every week."(Generic Pharmaceutical Association. 2011. P.1). With the continuing increase in health care expenditures and health insurance premiums for business and consumers; in 2011 premiums increased by nine percent (Abelson, Reed. September 27, 2011. P.1),

Brand Names: Will 'Ipad' Become Generic Word
Words: 595 Length: 2 Pages Topic: Not Specified Paper #: 98532605

Brand Names: Will 'iPad' Become Generic Word for Tablet?" was published by the U.S.A. Today, with the central premise concerning a relatively unknown yet ubiquitous phenomenon known as genericide. According to the article, which was compiled by the Associated Press (AP), Apple Inc. And its proprietary iPad tablet computing device is poised to alter the English lexicon through its supremacy within a particular market segment. Like the Band-Aid and

Generic Prescription Drug Program As
Words: 1005 Length: 3 Pages Topic: Medicine Paper #: 61512758

Recommended Pricing Strategies: As a pharmaceutical benefit manager, I have several primary stakeholders to whom I am responsible. These include: my organization, the employer as my client, the employees of the client as plan participants, the pharmacists dispensing the medications, and the pharmaceutical manufacturers and/or distributors. My job is to develop a plan that is profitable for my organization. I must also develop a plan that is cost-effective for the employer.

Drug Monograph for Serious Infections
Words: 1394 Length: 5 Pages Topic: Medicine Paper #: 46553583

Vancomycin should be given for at least 60 minutes. The initial dosage for pediatrics with renal impairment is not less than 15 mg/kg per day or 15 times the GFR in mL/min. Premature infants should have longer dosing intervals. PO administration should be 40 mg/kg/day in 3-4 divided doses for 7-10 days. The maximum is 2,000 mg/day, which may be diluted in 1 oz of water or administered through

Branding New Service Dominant Logic
Words: 12522 Length: 50 Pages Topic: Business - Advertising Paper #: 77038722

Branding in Service Markets Amp Aim And Objectives Themes for AMP Characteristics Composing Branding Concept Branding Evolution S-D Logic and Service Markets Branding Challenges in Service Markets Considerations for Effective Service Branding Categories and Themes Branding Theory Evolution S-D Logic and Service Markets Branding Challenges in Service Markets Considerations for Effective Service Branding Branding Concept Characteristics Characteristics Composing Branding Concept Sampling of Studies Reviewed Evolution of Branding Theory Evolution of Marketing Service-Brand-Relationship-Value Triangle Brand Identity, Position & Image Just as marketing increasingly influences most aspects of the consumer's lives, brands