growing your own food

Change is an inevitable aspect within the society. It is imperative to embrace positive change and shun that which is deemed negative and disparaging. Every individual has a role to play within the community. However, such change has created a sense of disconnect and lack of engagement amongst individuals within the community. For instance, despite the positive change instigated by technology and the internet, it has created increased online engagement but a false one at that owing to increased lack of actual engagement.

In the same way, change has created a lack of understanding on sustainability and the role that persons in the society play in it. The key argument made by this essay is that the opinions of people regarding community and their place in the world change when they begin to grow their own food. The perspective of an individual concerning the community together with the role that they play in the world will completely change the minute they begin to grow their own food.

This is an imperative aspect for the reason that individuals growing their own food generates positive change. Imperatively, such perspectives and commitment to the community does not emanate out of nowhere. Rather, it stems from and is directed by ideals, ideologies, and suppositions that spiral from our upbringings and philosophies, from our understandings, and from our cognizant decisions regarding what is fitting and right.

Moreover, it is such aspects that fashion our vision of what the world ought to be and as a result motivate us to ensure that it becomes that way. Such positive change is necessary because humans as a species ought to engage more with one another, and also have a better sense of the role that they play in this world (Community Tool Box, 2016). As pointed out by Bekoff and Bexell (2010), human beings currently live in a suffering world that is in in great need of healing.

In the present, there is an overruling and prevailing sense of turmoil that is perceptible to any individual that takes time to take note. Human beings as a species have come to notice the level of disconnection owing to the various aspects such as worldwide damages of biodiversity and of the various destructive ways. As a species in the kingdom, there has always been competition for survival but also veneration and reverence, and humans have known that coexistence and sustainability are vital and essential.

Through growing our own food, individuals begin to comprehend the necessity for untainted food that is healthy, clean water as well as clean air. What this fundamentally necessitates is a mutual and shared belief in that profoundly humans all have an understanding that they have come to be disconnected from our communities and our means of survival, and are searching for ways to reconnect with those things.

It is not just our drifting nature and mobility as human beings but also our capability to cope with circumstances using scientific solutions unobtainable to early humans that permits us in the present day to exist out of synch, in foul ways, with natural measures and other species, at least for now. Human beings' inclination into technological solutions, a great deal of which are apparent and short-lives, provide us with a false sense of security that everything at the present moment is okay, yet it clearly is not.

In addition, one of the key causes for the prevailing disconnect is based on individuals disregarding and overlooking the fact that human beings are not exempted from natural principles that they assent for all other species. Our perspective and thinking allows us to create and discover temporary resolutions that are not fully sustainable (Bekoff and Bexell, 2010). One of the key ways in which human beings constantly become disengaged is centered on their practices of acquiring and purchasing things.

Essentially, purchasing a commodity is deemed to be an election for the production as well as sell of such a commodity. However, this in itself is also adds to the disregarding and overlooking nature of human beings. For instance, people within the community will enjoy eating a tasty steak, but also fail to understand where it came from and whether there will be more in the forthcoming periods. Humans more often than not fail to take into consideration the ecological and human influences they have.

Therefore, this can be linked back to the main argument that by growing their own food, people will not only become more engaged, but will create positive change and gain a better understanding as to the role they play in the community (Bekoff and Bexell, 2010). On the other hand, it can be argued that individuals' perspectives and their role in the community is not the only justification for growing one's food.

The main argument in itself is a supposition regarding the nature of people that some people either may not hold true for all, or if it does hold true may nevertheless not be accepted by many. It is imperative to note that not every single individual will not be convinced that they ought to grow food.

In particular, with the advancement in changes such as technological changes, it becomes harder and harder for individuals to perceive the importance of growing their own food and the major role that they play within the community. It can be argued that with the advancement in technology, human beings have become all the more estranged from nature and community engagement. Therefore, such arguments and perspectives may not hold. There are some individuals within the community that are lazy and therefore fail to make considerable effort.