Verified Document

Katz V United States Essay

Related Topics:

Issues before the Court

Does the Constitutional Amendment IV provide a safeguard for telephonic conversations carried out in a public telephone booth? Can secret recordings of such conversations be presented in the form of evidence in court trials (Katz v. United States)?

Facts of the Case/Case Summary



The petitioner in the case had been charged with infringing federal regulations by conveying wagering information via a public payphone (Katz v. United States). As evidence in the case trial, the government presented recordings of the petitioner’s conversation procured using a concealed listening device in the booth. The appellate court did not agree with the petitioner’s argument that the governmental evidence ought not to be used against him.

The payphone in question was located in Los Angeles. Katz utilized it to convey wagering information to Miami and Boston, thus violating federal regulation. Following careful surveillance, the Federal Bureau of Investigation tapped the booth to record the messages passed on by the petitioner. The secret recordings were subsequently presented at trial as evidence implicating Katz (Katz v. United States). Katz called for the suppression of these recordings, citing Amendment IV safeguards. The jury denied his motion. The appellate court also rejected the claim, found the evidence perfectly admissible, and granted certiorari.

Court Decision



The majority judgment was filed by Potter Stewart, Supreme Court Associate Justice. Katz vehemently argued that payphones...
But Amendment IV only safeguards individuals from unwarranted intrusion, and not places (Katz v. United States). Citizens can reasonably expect the protection of personal privacy even in public settings. While Katz wasn’t overtly attempting to stay out of sight of the public when going to make his betting-related phone calls, he expected no unwelcome ear to eavesdrop. Just because he had no issues with being seen making his calls didn’t mean he had no issues being overheard as well. Anybody entering public phone booths can expect Constitutional Amendment IV safeguards; he/she will certainly not expect his/her private telephonic conversations to be heard by the world. After acknowledging this fact, clearly, Amendment IV safeguards individuals, rather than places, from unwarranted search-and-seizure activities (Katz v. United States). Tapping a phone to record conversations was a form of search-and-seizure activity under Amendment IV. Thus, without a proper search warrant that is accompanied by adequate probable cause, none of the evidence procured ought to be allowed at court.

Reason for the Court



The Constitutional Amendment IV grants protection to people, not places. Justice Harlan offers a two-fold examination for the above protection (Katz v. United States): 1) The individual in question should exhibit a genuine expectation of secrecy; and, 2) His/her expectation should be justified.

According to the Court, both entities involved in the case were guilty of wrongly formulating the issue. Rather…

Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

United States Vs Jones
Words: 1056 Length: 3 Document Type: Essay

United States v. Jones Issues before the Court Is attaching a GPS tracker to a motor vehicle, and subsequently employing it for tracking its movement on public roads, counted as a search-and-seizure operation under Amendment IV? (United States v. Jones | Case Brief Summary) Facts of the Case Nightclub owner and manager Jones, the defendant in the case, was suspected of trafficking narcotic drugs. From information collected using a number of investigation methods, law

Katz Vs United States
Words: 700 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

Katz v United States case, addressing case facts, involved parties, objectives and arguments put forth by the parties, chief issue, and case holding as well as the rationale behind it. Parties Involved The United States and Charles Katz Facts Charles Katz, the petitioner of the case, conveyed telephone messages relating to gambling to Miami and Boston, via a Los Angeles public phone booth, in February 1965; this is a breach of federal regulation. Following

Atlas, Ed., How They See Us: Meditations
Words: 654 Length: 2 Document Type: Term Paper

Atlas, ed., How They See Us: Meditations on America Although entertaining, and for the most part true, this book tends to have a "preaching to the choir" perspective that could too easily isolate some readers. I get the sense that a large segment of the population that could benefit from reading this book are precisely the ones that will avoid it, thereby nulling the potential benefit it might have in

U.S. Constitution the United States
Words: 4248 Length: 10 Document Type: Term Paper

The truth is that the forefathers were actually quite surprised at the effect that the signing of the Constitution had created in America; at the democratic society and government that resulted after the ratification of the Constitution. The ratification in itself was a long one, and it involved in essence the perusal of the written Constitution by each state for ratification purposes, for which each state was required to create

Cross-Cultural Comparison on Work Value Between US and China
Words: 2471 Length: 9 Document Type: Research Paper

Work Values Cross-cultural comparison on work value between U.S. And China A value is "what a person consciously or subconsciously desires, wants, or seeks to attain" (Locke, 1983). Peterson and Gonzalez (2005) say values "are motivational forces," and "influence the role work plays in people's lives." Dawis (2005) asserts that each person (P) has requirements that need to be met, most through their environments (E). In fact, Dawis claims that "Many of

Prison Reform the United States
Words: 3176 Length: 10 Document Type: Research Paper

The average felony sentence imposed upon federal and state offenders in 1996 was 62 months, or just over 5 years. On average these prisoners actually serve 45% of a state sentence for a mean prison stint of 2 years and 4 months, and 85% of a federal sentence for a stint of 4 years and 5 months. Once they are released, the recidivism rates are high. According to Lin

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now