While some states agreed with the approach decided by President at the time George Bush, other states would have opted for a more peaceful approach. Otherwise put, the seed of these international political conflicts was represented by the War on Terrorism, or the violent response of the Bush Administration to the terrorist attacks on September 11. The national opinions were also diverse, with some groups voicing their concern that the WOT was merely a pretense to invade the rich-in-oil Afghanistan and Iraq (Shah, 2007), whilst others sought refuge, peace, security or even revenge in the endeavor. Regardless of the stand taken by each individual, fact remains that the War on Terror has generated numerous effects upon the national economy. This then means that the quality of delivering these services will dramatically decrease in both short and long terms, to culminate with reduced living standards and a decreased quality of life for the American citizens.
Gary North (2006) is rather cynical relative to the War on Terror and argues that it is being led by the same organization which ran the unsuccessful war on drugs -- the results are expected to be similar. Placing aside this personal opinion and trying to remain objective, North argues that the WOT could easily materialize in a long-term increase in the trade prices of several commodities, such as crude oil, natural gas, aluminum, steel or silver. Price increases in these commodities are already obvious but the War on Terrorism could easily contribute to a maintenance of this ascendant trend.
Then, another direct result of the WOT upon the American economy could materialize in an increase in the demand for military products and services. As it has been previously mentioned, the focus of the United States authorities could be switched from production to national security, meaning that more resources are allocated to the military and that demand for these types of products continues to grow. On the long run, this will translate into increased revenues for the military products manufacturers and service deliverers. Additionally, the stock prices of these organizations' shares could increase (North). In a nutshell, the economic power of the companies in the military sector could augment in the years to come.
Matthew O'Rourke (2005) looks at the economic effects of the War on Terror from a more military angle. As such, he identifies two direct impacts, materialized in the following:
"An increase in overall military assistance to countries experiencing conflict
The elimination of sanctions on arms exports to these countries" (O'Rourke).
These two effects lead to the conclusion forwarded by North, in the meaning that the power of the American military sector is expected to increase in the long run. Additionally however, these endeavors have been made mostly from federal budgets, meaning that the governmental spending in fighting international terrorism place a growing pressure onto the national system. Money has to be taken from the budgets of education, ...
To better understand the economic costs of the War on Terror, one should take a glimpse at the following numbers:
According to the U.S. National Debt Clock Website, the U.S. federal debt of today (April 23, 2009) amounts to a staggering $11 trillion, accounting for nearly 80% of the gross domestic product registered for 2008 (Central Intelligence Agency, 2009)
The total cost of the War on Terrorism commenced in 2001 is of $849 billion, much more than the war in Vietnam
$662 billion is the cost of the war in Iraq and $186 billion represents the cost of the war in Afghanistan (Cost of War)
The tragic events of September 11, 2001 can be described in a series of manners, such as the most vicious attacks against the Americans on their soil, ruthless murders of innocent people and so on. But an analysis of the attacks from a more detached angle will reveal numerous economic effects, alongside with the already heavily debated political and social impacts. In terms of economic stability, this has been most dramatically affected in the city of New York, where nearly 3,000 professional workers were lost in the attacks. Locally, modifications have occurred in terms of export industries as well as loss of employment and structural modifications in employment across the city. Nationwide, the effects were numerous, and commenced with a restricted access of foreigners within the country to culminate with a sky high federal debt. In between, some of the economic effects of the 9/11 terrorist attacks include short-term disruptions in the trade relations with partner countries (namely Canada and Mexico) or the long-term difficulties of the airline and insurance industries.
Dolfman, M.L., Wasser, S.F., June 2004, 9/11 and the New York City Economy: A Borough-to-Borough Analysis, Monthly Labor Review
Makinen, G., 2002, Report for Congress: The Economic Effects of 9/11: A Retrospective Assessment, Federation of American Scientists, Retrieved from www.fas.org/irp/crs/RL31617.pdf on April 22, 2009
North, G., April 1, 2006, War on Terrorism's Economic Effects, Economic Edge, http://econedge.org/01/war-on-terrorisms-economic-effects / last accessed on April 23, 2009
O'Rourke, M., Spring 2005, The Impact of the "War on Terrorism" on Internal Conflicts, The Ploughshares Monitor, http://www.ploughshares.ca/libraries/monitor/monm05d.htm last accessed on April 23, 2009
Shah, A., 2007, War on Terror, Global Issues, http://www.globalissues.org/issue/245/war-on-terror last accessed on April 23, 2009
2009, The World Factbook -- United States, Central Intelligence Agency, https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/us.html last accessed on…
This then means that the quality of delivering these services will dramatically decrease in both short and long terms, to culminate with reduced living standards and a decreased quality of life for the American citizens.
Economics Evaluate explanations offered Economics of MNEs, China and Exchange Rates Evaluate the various explanations that have been offered for the existence of the multinational enterprise. China is a notoriously difficult place to do business. Explain what makes the business environment so challenging and explain the strategies a firm may use in order to overcome those challenges. Explain how exchange rates are determined in a floating exchange rate system and identify the key causes of
Health Reforms Health Rearms For a long time, the Health Care concern has been a centre of discussion in the society as well as among the representatives in a bid to find out which would be the best way to cushion Americans from the ever increasing burden of having to take care of themselves medically. Efforts have been made but still there is no single solution to the issue hence a combined
Even more, high inflation attracted large budget deficits. In order to cover them from one fiscal period to another, a great part of Canada's national savings had to be directed towards this direction. The effects consisted in public debt accumulation, which in turn led to increased risks in the country's interest rates. And the chain of effects did not stop here. The situation continued with discouraged investments, especially where equipment and
Disrupting America's economic system is a fundamental objective of terrorists Even as the world continues to struggle with the terrible shock from the September 11 attacks in New York and Washington, one principle lesson has already become clear: disrupting our economic system is a fundamental objective of terrorists. Prior to September 11, our economic environment was certainly not immune to terror, in comparison to many other nations; we lived relatively terror-free. Now,
fiscal crisis currently facing Argentina, and what they are doing to ease the crisis. CAUSES OF THE CRISIS The South American country of Argentina has been on the brink of fiscal crisis throughout 2001. The default on her debt of over $130 billion would be the largest in history. Argentina's fiscal crisis did not begin over night; in fact, the roots go back to the 1980s. The country's economy has been
Warren Buffet, for instance, earned $46 million last year and was taxed a mere 17.7 per cent, while his secretary who earned $60,000 was taxed 30%. Buffet, after all, super rich as he is, is not working making his money instead from investments, capital gains and dividends that, as imposed by the bush administration, are taxed at rates that are as low as 15% (Grosz, 2012). This kind of