national identity construction in tibet

Problem/Puzzle/Research Questions Anand (2000) explores the narratives that shape Tibetan identity, especially the notion of a national identity among those in diaspora. The author explores the impact of Western orientalist theorizing of Tibet on Tibetan self-consciousness, claiming that Tibetan self-consciousness and national identity has been shaped by these orientalist narratives. Main Argument The author argues that Tibetan national identity has been historically and socially constructed, via discursive practices relating to orientalism: an idealized narrative of what Tibet means.

Theories and Concepts Anand (2000) invokes social constructivism, identity construction, and discursive identity construction in the analysis. Empirical Evidence To support claims and substantiate positions, Anand (2000) provides an overview of the Tibetan diaspora. The author also cites authors with similar views on nationalism, and also shows how Tibetans in diaspora have had access to the means by which to create and maintain national identity. Anand (2000) also refers to several example of orientalism in Western depictions of Tibet, such as books and movies.

Structures, Interactions, Actors The structures referred to include the Tibetan government in exile versus other overarching structures such as the Indian and Chinese governments. Actors include the Dalai Lama, and also Western theorists that have supported the Tibetan national narrative. Interactions between actors and structures are evident in the ways Western discursive practices have been incorporated into Tibetan national identity construction. Surprising Insights Rarely is the Tibetan question framed in such a way that shows how national identity construction.