This paper examines change management and resistance within healthcare organizations through the lens of a seven-step psychological model. It explores why nurses and other healthcare professionals often resist change — owing to entrenched routines and the high demands of patient care — and outlines the sequential stages individuals pass through, from initial shock and denial to full integration of new practices. The paper emphasizes the unique role of the Clinical Nurse Leader in translating organizational directives into clinically meaningful rationales, fostering emotional as well as rational acceptance, and guiding staff through learning and realization phases toward lasting behavioral change.
The paper demonstrates effective application of a theoretical framework to a professional context. Rather than simply describing the seven-step model in the abstract, the author maps each stage onto real healthcare scenarios — financial cutbacks, technology adoption, staff reductions — showing how theory informs practice. This technique is characteristic of strong applied research writing at the undergraduate level.
The paper opens by establishing the organizational context and the specific challenge of change resistance in healthcare. It then walks sequentially through the seven stages of the change model, pausing at key stages (rational understanding, emotional acceptance, learning, realization) to discuss leadership implications. It closes with a synthesis that repositions the Clinical Nurse Leader as uniquely suited to bridge management directives and nursing-floor realities.
It is often said that the one constant in any organization is change. Healthcare organizations have had to weather tremendous changes over the past decade. A number of social factors — including changes in the health insurance system and the need for more nurses and other staff members to treat an aging population — have demanded greater responsiveness and flexibility among nurse practitioners. Yet resistance to change in healthcare organizations, partly because of the need for routines to dispense high-level care, can be considerable among nurses and other trained professionals. Varying routines and standard operating procedures while still providing consistently high-quality care is an enduring challenge. A Clinical Nurse Leader must understand why individuals may be resistant to change in order to overcome psychological obstacles when introducing new technology or reconfiguring the organization or procedures of a specific department.
Even under the best of circumstances, change resistance is not uncommon. Just as someone who is grieving will often pass through certain stages before coming to terms with reality, so will an individual confronting change. A change manager must be aware of these stages of change resistance and acceptance, which are often understood as a seven-step model. The first stage of confronting change — shock — reflects the fact that change is often unexpected. The second phase, denial, is when organizational members resist the inevitability of the need to change, even (or especially) if management explains to them why change is required (Recklies 2010). In healthcare organizations, if the changes regarding patient care are imposed by managers who are not healthcare providers themselves, change resistance may be even greater during these first two phases. This is why a Clinical Nurse Leader can be so valuable in translating the need for change into language the staff can comprehend.
The third stage is rational understanding, whereby the explanation for change is intellectually grasped but not yet fully accepted on an emotional level (Recklies 2010). When conveying a rational explanation for the needed change, input from individuals with real knowledge about the technical demands of nursing and patient care is essential. For example, if changes are necessitated by financial cutbacks, reductions in staff cannot simply be imposed. Staff cannot be left to sort things out with fewer resources. An audit of how to do more with less may be required, and nurses will only buy into the new plan if it can be medically justified (Campbell 2008).
Even after the rational nature of a change proposal is accepted, resistant, restraining forces may remain. Emotional acceptance is a separate, fourth stage that follows rational acceptance. As Recklies (2010) notes, "Only if management succeeds in creating willingness for changing values, beliefs, and behaviors will the organization be able to exploit its real potential. In the worst case, however, change processes will be stopped or slowed down here." Having a sense of urgency combined with a clear rationale behind the change is required to drive acceptance forward throughout the organization. If the need for change is accepted first rationally and then emotionally, workers will gradually become more willing and open to learn, and to incorporate the change into the organization's standard operating procedures. Individuals are more apt to accept change if, for example, they are convinced that it will improve patient care in the long run, rather than if the directive is merely issued because management says so.
You’re 56% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.