This paper examines the conditions necessary for policy innovation in community health centers, focusing on the collaborative relationships between academic health centers and community organizations. Drawing on research from Harvard's Health Law and Policy Innovation program, HRSA analyses, and stakeholder theory, the paper outlines how partnerships can be fostered and sustained over time. It addresses the organizational and financial challenges health centers face, explores the factors that influence healthy aging among vulnerable populations, and identifies the full range of stakeholders — from employees and government agencies to community members — whose involvement is essential to the effective operation of community health centers.
An important but often overlooked aspect of community involvement in academic health centers is the formation of collaborative and responsive relationships with stakeholders. Such relationships enhance the role of academic health centers both as providers of healthcare and as leaders in community health (Brutger, 2010). Research from Harvard's Center for Health Law and Policy Innovation (CHLPI) provides evidence of the ways in which the design of health plans can discourage some people from seeking the care they need.
An interdisciplinary PhD project conducted under the banner of "Pathways to a Healthy Life" aims to push aside the boundaries between disciplines so that the university's contribution to healthcare — spanning life expectancy, wellbeing, and aging — can be improved. The project evaluates the various ways in which local communities, individuals, lifestyle choices, and environmental and economic conditions affect healthy aging. In particular, the study sought a clearer understanding of the poor living conditions and experiences of groups classified as "vulnerable," including unemployed and homeless youth, and examined the kinds of relationships they had with their local communities as well as the social and economic structures surrounding them. It also explored how these factors influenced the decisions individuals made, including dietary choices (News, 2016).
To foster better partnerships and relationships between community health centers and academic centers, the two can begin by sharing collaborative models and the best practices each has found effective. The evolution of relationships between these centers should be monitored continuously so that partnerships can adapt and address the changing needs of the community (Brutger, 2010). According to an analysis by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), nearly 4% of health centers face managerial, organizational, and financial problems so serious they threaten the organization's survival. Only about half of these centers have strong internal operational and management systems and structures.
Because of weak internal structures, changes in the external market environment — for example, a rise in the number of insured patients during difficult economic times — may negatively impact the viability of these centers. For stability to be achieved, even as health centers evolve, astute leadership is required that goes beyond simply balancing the books and managing the bottom line. Factors such as access to adequate capital, information technology, operations management, and productivity must all receive appropriate attention, particularly during periods of organizational evolution (Taylor, 2004).
"Defining and classifying health center stakeholders"
You’re 60% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.