This paper examines the evolution of health informatics as an interdisciplinary field combining technology, healthcare science, information systems, and human psychology. It discusses the longstanding challenge of encouraging healthcare providers to adopt electronic health and medical records, the concerns surrounding HIPAA's effect on medical research, and how informatics has matured to offer both patient security and large-scale research capabilities. The paper concludes with a call for greater provider education and openness toward informatics tools.
The paper demonstrates effective use of direct quotation integrated with analysis. Rather than simply dropping quotes, the author frames each citation — particularly the O'Herrin et al. (2004) passage — within a before-and-after narrative that shows how the field has matured since HIPAA's implementation. This technique allows the paper to show disciplinary evolution through contrasting perspectives across time.
The paper opens by defining health informatics and identifying the central tension around provider adoption. It then narrows to the specific legislative challenge posed by HIPAA and its effect on research. The final paragraph broadens back out to a normative conclusion, using an analogy to advocate for cultural change in healthcare. The three-paragraph body moves from definition → problem → resolution, a clear and logical pattern suitable for a short reflective essay.
According to Sweeney (2017), the discipline of healthcare informatics unites technology, healthcare science, computer and information systems, and knowledge of human psychology to optimize healthcare delivery. Providers are now employing experts in the specialty of informatics to better understand how to use its power for good and to increase healthcare providers' comfort levels in using informatics on a daily basis.
There has been a many decades-long struggle to encourage more providers to adopt electronic health and medical records to ensure greater uniformity and accuracy of data across providers. Unfortunately, many providers are concerned that the investment in training, new equipment, and other measures is too costly to justify a full shift to electronic medical files — although the ubiquity of computers makes holding out more and more difficult.
When first implemented, one of the concerns surrounding the passage of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) was that it might inhibit medical research using public databases due to privacy restrictions. As O'Herrin, Fost, and Kudsk (2004) noted, "HIPAA implementation strategies increase workload… and increase the dropout rate for proposed studies when investigators are unable or unwilling to meet the regulatory requirements." However, informatics has evolved considerably since then, with more and more researchers citing their support for the use of electronic records, provided they are appropriately protected by privacy legislation.
Informatics has the potential to offer security and value to patients while simultaneously providing researchers access to large databases of information that can be analyzed in full, rather than relying on the small representative samplings that were common before electronic recordkeeping systems became widespread.
Informatics is still an evolving field, and greater education of providers in its use remains necessary. As the biblical passage reminds us, "When I was a child, I talked like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I put the ways of childhood behind me" (1 Corinthians 13:11). Increasingly, the childish fear of technology must be put behind us in favor of the substantial benefits that health informatics holds for patients and providers alike.
Bible Gateway. (2021). 1 Corinthians 13:11. Retrieved from https://www.biblegateway.com/verse/en/1%20Corinthians%2013%3A11
You’re 84% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.