This essay traces the concept of human rights from its philosophical roots in Aristotle and Stoic moral universalism through the natural rights theories of John Locke and Immanuel Kant, to the three generations of rights enshrined in the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights and subsequent international treaties. The paper addresses major objections to universal human rights standards—including moral relativism, state sovereignty claims, and certain religious critiques—and offers rebuttals to each. It concludes by examining the consequences of human rights violations in Darfur and Abu Ghraib as urgent evidence for why universal human rights protections must be actively supported and enforced.
The concept of human rights has a long history spanning over two thousand years, and its origins can be traced to the moral philosophies of Aristotle and the Stoic philosophers. The theory of human rights, however, has broadened considerably over the centuries, and its contemporary form reflects the development of human thought over time. In the present-day world, human rights aim to secure for individuals the necessary economic, political, and social conditions required to lead a minimally good life. Such an expanded definition of human rights is now incorporated in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) and other international human rights treaties and declarations, which together have acquired the status of an International Bill of Rights.
While there are many philosophical and legal arguments against the concept of a universal set of standards for human rights, a strong case can be made that without such basic rules of behavior, human beings cannot rise above the level of instinct nor realize their full potential for development. It is therefore the responsibility of every individual to support human rights and to put moral pressure on national and international institutions to safeguard them. This essay presents arguments in support of human rights and rebuts some of the major objections against them, while also providing a brief account of their historical origins and development.
The theory of human rights is based on the doctrine of moral universalism, first put forward by Aristotle and the Stoics. In Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle presents his argument in support of the existence of a natural moral order and contends that such a natural order should be the basis of all truly rational systems of justice.1 Aristotle underlines the universality of natural morality by remarking, "the natural is that which has the same validity everywhere and does not depend upon acceptance." This concept of moral universalism implies that morality is not dependent on social and historical conditions and applies to all human beings regardless of place and time—forming the very basis of human rights. Roman Stoic philosophers such as Cicero and Seneca also supported moral universalism and argued that all moral laws originated in the rational will of God, and that the authority of such moral law transcended all local legal codes. Christianity, which emerged later, maintained the belief in a universal moral code throughout the ensuing centuries.
The doctrine of natural law and natural rights—a concept most closely approximating the contemporary idea of human rights—emerged during the Age of Enlightenment in 17th- and 18th-century Europe. The most influential advocate of this doctrine was the 17th-century English philosopher John Locke. In Two Treatises of Government (1688), he propounded the theory that individuals possess natural rights independent of the political recognition granted to them by the state.2 Locke made this the basis of his contention that the sole purpose of government is to protect the natural rights of human beings, rather than to further the interests of a monarch or ruling elite—ideas that greatly influenced the founding fathers of the United States.
Locke had proposed that the natural rights of human beings emanated from natural law, which in turn originated from God. Subsequent philosophers, most notably the 18th-century German philosopher Immanuel Kant, suggested a more secular and philosophically acceptable source of natural rights. Kant proposed that human beings, as autonomous and rational agents, universally formulate moral principles, and that natural rights therefore originate from human reason rather than from any divine will.
The initial concept of human rights, put forward by John Locke and adopted by the libertarian democracies of the time, was concerned only with the natural rights of individuals relating to their life, liberty, and property. Documents such as the U.S. Declaration of Independence (1776) and the French Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen (1789) reflect this first generation of human rights, which are mostly concerned with protecting the individual from the excesses of the state. The second generation of human rights, relating mainly to socioeconomic rights—rights to welfare, education, and leisure—began to be recognized as fundamental rights of individuals at a later stage. Still later, in the second half of the 20th century, third-generation human rights such as the right to national self-determination, a clean environment, and the rights of indigenous minorities were also recognized as basic human rights.
The first and second generation rights have been incorporated in the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights treaties, such as the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights (1953) and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966). The third-generation rights are only partly covered in these documents. Watchdog non-governmental organizations such as Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International keep a vigilant eye on the human rights records of nation-states in order to put moral pressure on governments to adhere to basic human rights principles.
"Relativism, sovereignty, and religious objections addressed"
"Darfur and Abu Ghraib as cautionary case studies"
The contemporary concept of human rights has its roots in ancient moral philosophies as well as the theories of natural rights and moral universalism. It aims to guarantee a minimally good life for all individuals around the world regardless of their caste, color, nationality, religion, or gender. Despite objections raised mostly by those with vested interests, the majority of people around the world agree that human rights should not only be respected but also actively promoted. It is indeed unfortunate that frequent human rights violations continue to occur globally—as witnessed in Darfur and Abu Ghraib—making it all the more imperative for individuals and pressure groups to support human rights and to put moral pressure on their respective governments to implement and uphold them.
You’re 53% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.