Loss Contingency Accounting Under FASB GAAP: Case Analysis
This paper examines a loss contingency accounting scenario involving two companies engaged in a copyright and patent infringement dispute. Using FASB Accounting Standards Codification 450-20 and U.S. GAAP guidelines, the paper addresses three core questions: how to report the recorded liability as of December 31, 2007; whether Company M should adjust its liability for 2009 given the appeal; and when the reduction of a previously recorded loss contingency should be recognized. The analysis demonstrates how probability benchmarks, estimability requirements, and the timing of court rulings interact with proper financial reporting obligations under established accounting standards.
- Introduction: Timeline of M and W legal dispute
- Defining Loss Contingency Under FASB ASC 450-20: GAAP definition applied to December 2007 liability
- Reporting Requirements for Loss Contingencies: Two GAAP criteria for recognizing a loss contingency
- Adjusting Liability After Appeal: When to record reduction after verdict overturned
- Conclusion: FASB standards ensure fair accounting practices
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Directly anchors each answer to a specific FASB codification section (ASC 450-20), demonstrating proper use of authoritative accounting guidance.
- Applies the two-pronged GAAP recognition test — probability and estimability — to concrete facts, making the legal-accounting connection explicit and logical.
- Follows a clear question-and-answer structure that mirrors professional accounting memo formats, making the analysis easy to follow.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper uses rule application analysis: it identifies the governing standard, quotes the relevant definition, and then methodically applies each criterion to the facts of the case. This is a fundamental technique in accounting and law-based writing, where citing exact statutory or codification language and mapping it to a factual scenario forms the core of a sound argument.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a narrative introduction establishing the timeline of the legal dispute, then moves through three discrete analytical questions. Each question section introduces a relevant GAAP rule, quotes or paraphrases it, and applies it to Company M's situation. The paper concludes with a brief synthesis. Two references — the FASB Codification and a Journal of Accountancy article — provide the authoritative support base throughout.
Introduction
A transaction between Company M and Company W has caused serious accounting problems, and a complex legal framework is necessary to determine how to resolve this issue. Company M and Company W have been engaged in a lengthy legal battle over a copyright and patent infringement dispute. In May 2007, Company W filed a claim against Company M, and a verdict was reached in September 2009. The jury found that Company M must pay Company W $18.5 million for the infringement. Company M disputed the verdict and filed an appeal in November 2009. More than one year later, the appeals court ruled in favor of Company M and overturned the jury's verdict. Company W remained dissatisfied and filed a petition for a rehearing the following month. That request was denied, and the matter was closed according to all legal proceedings.
It is important for companies to abide by FASB standards in order to maintain a level playing field in business. Proper accounting procedures ensure that a fair and transparent arena for business transactions is available to all parties who wish to uphold high accounting standards. Resolutions must be made by reference to the FASB under U.S. GAAP, which provides a useful framework for examining the issues presented in this case.
Defining Loss Contingency Under FASB ASC 450-20
The FASB provides specific and useful guidance for addressing the accounting issues in this case. Under ASC 450-20 of the U.S. GAAP, the subject of loss contingencies is explored and applies directly to the situation involving Companies M and W. According to this standard, a loss contingency is defined as "an existing condition, situation, or set of circumstances involving uncertainty as to possible loss to an entity that will ultimately be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The term loss is used for convenience to include many charges against income that are commonly referred to as expenses and others that are commonly referred to as losses."
Even though Company M was eventually exonerated, the reported liability as of December 31, 2007 should remain unchanged at $17 million.
Reporting Requirements for Loss Contingencies
Under the FASB, two requirements must be met in order to report a loss contingency. The first is that the likelihood of the event occurring — in this case, that Company M would be found liable — must be determinable. The second is that the amount of the loss must be reasonably estimable. To clarify these requirements, the U.S. GAAP states that a liability should be recognized when it is probable that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation. Both conditions are satisfied in Company M's case.
Additionally, the amount of the obligation can be reasonably estimated, providing a reliable basis for the recorded liability. The FASB Accounting Standards Codification uses a 70% probability threshold as the benchmark for determining whether an event is "probable" — a standard that appears appropriate given the circumstances of this case. Applying these standards, it is appropriate for Company M not to adjust its liability for 2009, as there is no material departure from FASB requirements if the company proceeds in this manner.
Conclusion
It is important for companies to abide by FASB standards in order to present a level playing field to all participants in business. Accounting procedures ultimately ensure that a fair and just environment for business transactions is available to those who uphold high accounting standards. In this case, the relevant provisions of FASB ASC 450-20 and U.S. GAAP provide a clear and workable framework for determining how Company M should record, maintain, and ultimately reverse its reported liability throughout the course of this legal dispute.
References
Financial Accounting Standards Board. "Accounting Standards Codification." Viewed 17 Sep 2013. Retrieved from
Nilsen, K. (2011). Renewed focus on loss contingency disclosures. Journal of Accountancy, April 2011. Retrieved from
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.