This literature review examines the multifaceted role of nurse leaders as recruiters of future nursing staff. It addresses how institutions can leverage incentive programs—including tuition reimbursement and mentorship—to develop internal talent pipelines. The paper explores nursing theory, particularly Neuman's Systems Model, as a recruitment and pedagogical tool, and argues for expanding the educator role of Advanced Practice Nurses (APNs). It also analyzes recruitment challenges related to cultural competence, institutional racism, and gender disparity, drawing on frameworks such as Leininger's Transcultural Nursing Theory and federal CLAS standards to advocate for a more diverse, well-supported nursing workforce.
The paper exemplifies thematic literature review structure, organizing diverse sources not chronologically but by conceptual function—incentives, theory, education, diversity—allowing each theme to build on the last. Direct quotations from primary sources are used strategically to support, rather than substitute for, the author's own analytical claims.
The paper opens with a framing introduction, then develops four substantive thematic sections: institutional incentives and mentorship, nursing theory as a recruitment paradigm, the APN-as-educator argument, and diversity recruitment (covering cultural competence and gender). A brief conclusion reframes the nurse leader's responsibility as one of generational stewardship of the profession. Each section references multiple scholarly sources while maintaining a consistent normative argument about systemic reform.
Nurse leaders serve an integral role in demonstrating skill in the recruitment of future nurses. To do this they must work within existing systems, advocate for the expansion of essential recruitment systems, and maintain awareness of the need for systemic change. Nurse leaders must work collaboratively with human resource departments while also becoming fundamental community recruiters both inside and outside the work setting (Anson, 2000, p. 21). This review of literature addresses general and specific issues surrounding the role of nurse leaders as recruiters by thematically examining certain trends and changes needed in the health care industry—both in general and in nursing care specifically—that have implications for new nurse recruitment.
It is frequently asserted that the human element of any organization is its strongest asset, though restrictive budgets and a consistent multiplicity of needs often take precedence over investment in staff personal development. In nursing care the emphasis must remain on the patient of any institution (Knox, Blankmeyer & Stutzman, 2001, p. 45), which makes it essential to ensure that this emphasis does not cause institutions to stray from seeking the highest quality employees to provide optimum care. The literature therefore stresses the importance of instituting systems that provide staff with opportunity and conditional monetary incentive to obtain higher levels of professional development. In this manner nurse leaders are cultivated, and these leaders—with appropriate goals—will in turn recruit future nurses into the field.
Staffing is clearly one of the most important issues facing institutional care, especially in the face of a potentially exponentially growing health care industry. As baby boomers age, solutions to staffing must become core principles, as creating a base of invested and skilled staff is essential to sustaining new growth demands. Among the most foundational solutions to high staff turnover, as well as future recruitment and retention, is to offer staff opportunities for professional and personal development. Such investment will create returns equal to or greater than any expenditure on recruitment of entirely new staff. In this manner nurse leaders serve as demonstrative and philosophical models for recruitment.
Individuals in the medical care setting who have not yet achieved the status of RN or greater need the working opportunity to observe—and even formally and informally interview—RNs to help them determine the course of their future. This system could take the form of a matched mentorship program, in which an individual RN is matched with a staff member at the institution who wishes to explore nursing as an option (Feldman & Greenberg, 2005, p. 80). Medical institutions employ people at many levels, from housekeeping staff to direct care aides. All of these individuals have the potential to develop into well-informed and high-functioning RNs as they demonstrate skills learned at lower levels of nursing care and those obtained as nursing students. Programs and institutions that offer development incentives will therefore foster and support the nurse leader's ability to help recruit high-quality future nurses. The individuals recruited in this scenario often have high levels of interest in the caring professions and considerable existing skill; they have simply not been given the opportunity to develop that interest and skill into realized, high-level licensure and education.
Healthcare institutions that offer incentive programs such as advanced development tuition reimbursement give individuals a means to seek greater professional development, often in trade-specific areas and with the ultimate goal of continuity. Contracts involved often include a retention clause, whereby the individual commits to working for the healthcare organization after achieving a higher degree for a specified period of time, effectively "paying back" the institution for its investment (Cimini & Muhl, 1995, p. 74). RNs and other nurse leaders are thereby offered a direct opportunity to influence individuals with interest and aptitude in healthcare to advance their degrees to the level of a nurse. This symbiotic relationship needs not only to be nurtured as it exists today but expanded, to improve the odds that those with interest and aptitude who may lack opportunity are given that opportunity. Nurse leaders have the authority and responsibility to advocate for such systems in every institution in which they work.
One way this can be achieved is to offer both time and conditional tuition reimbursement to current and future staff members at both skilled and entry levels, ensuring bilateral investment. Offering staff members the opportunity and time to pursue adult professional development, as well as conditional tuition reimbursement to support it, achieves a twofold result: when seeking to retain or recruit employees, the facility offers a nontraditional benefit that can represent an immeasurable opportunity for many individuals, and second, it creates a base of staff with greater skills to meet the ultimate goal of excellent patient care. Nurse leaders should be at the core of any such program, as they demonstrate the most fundamental aspect of recruiting skilled nursing staff through lived experience.
Research and anecdotal studies illustrate that these unique support relationships in the nursing profession can endure for many years (Olson & Vance, 1993; Vance & Olson, 1991, 1998). Formal or planned mentor relationships are the organizational application of informal mentoring. These relationships promote ongoing learning, excellence, and creativity in work, as well as commitment to the organization. Formal mentor programs match mentors and protégés with respect to mutual goals and needs, and require careful planning, orientation, training, support, and follow-up of participants (Vance, 1999; Vance & Bamford, 1998). Formal mentor programs provide heightened focus and visibility to mentoring and create enhanced communication, motivation, and productivity (Duff & Cohen, 1993; Kaye & Jacobson, 1995; Murray & Owen, 1991; Wickman & Sjodin, 1997) (Feldman & Greenberg, 2005, p. 85).
Given the nature of facilities with overarching emphases on psychosocial care and the growth of knowledge in this area, seeking employees who are capable and willing to pursue cutting-edge development could be the determining factor of success. Developing those employees from individuals already committed to the institution would be the best possible solution to perceived shortcomings (Zlotnik, Vourlekis & Galambos, 2006, p. 83). Conditional reimbursement frequently emphasizes time and success contracts that are best employed when the individual is offered institutional support for growth. Forming a benefit such as a tuition reimbursement contract—often offered to employees with more than one year of service, with an emphasis on achievement goals such as grades above a certain level and a commitment to a certain number of years of service following degree or certificate completion—has proven effective in many institutional settings, including hospitals and prisons, in improving staff quality, recruitment, and retention (Wilkinson, 2002, p. 84). Simply employing such a tactic helps the institution demonstrate an overarching belief in the value of the human element in its organization, communicating this to current and future employees, to patients and families, and to the broader community.
This step also allows the institution to rightly claim that its overarching goal is to create a system that seeks out and builds the best staff it possibly can, reestablishing the medical industry as one that is progressively developmental rather than a collection of low-paid, entry-level, dead-end jobs. The importance of this message—and the creation of a more progressive reality—could make the difference between mediocre care and optimal care for residents and staff alike. In short, creating an environment where employees are offered the opportunity to better their professional standing at every level will produce a system with far less burnout and turnover, one that emphasizes future as well as immediate staff needs. The role that nurse leaders play in this is integral, as they can fundamentally encourage those they mentor to develop greater skills and education, helping to replace themselves as they age and leave their current positions (NSSRN, 2007).
In addition to offering conditional tuition reimbursement, facilities must also seek to allow staff time to achieve better outcomes with educational goals, including additional on-site in-service time, staff communication time regarding educational endeavors, and time off for educational attainment. Nurse leaders serve an integral role in this goal, as they advocate for such services and even take the lead in administering and teaching on-site continuing education (Feldman & Greenberg, 2005, p. 67). Staffing coordinators—who are often nurse leaders—must seek to give priority to educational needs when adjusting or creating schedules for staff, including offering incentives to staff not currently pursuing educational goals for assisting with this priority, regardless of whether a tuition reimbursement program is in place (Feldman & Greenberg, 2005, p. 233).
The fact that many nurse leaders serve as fundamental sources for new and emerging nursing paradigms and theories cannot be ignored in this review. The theories associated with nursing are as diverse as nurses themselves and serve several purposes. With regard to nurse recruitment, nursing theory and paradigm play a role in helping individuals see their future intrinsic role in nursing. A brief discussion of nursing theory is therefore warranted here.
One of the most significant nursing theories relevant to this discussion is that of Neuman. The literature associated with defining the Neuman model and with how it is applied in modern practice illuminates for the student both the intimate and global aspects of the system. Neuman's Systems Model is a construct developed to explain the interconnected nature of personal variables and the preventive measures of the nurse in helping the patient achieve balance in both care and life. The model acknowledges not only the importance of balance within the patient's body and life but within the care system itself. To develop such nursing paradigms and apply them within mentoring relationships could serve to stimulate thinking about how a future nurse might fit into this goal (Heyman & Wolfe, 2000, "Neuman's System Model: Key Concepts").
The system is constructed of several parts, some person-centric and others environmental. The five "person" variables as defined by Neuman are: physiological (the structure and function of the body), psychological (mental state and emotions), sociocultural (relationships, cultural expectations, and activities), spiritual (one's spiritual beliefs), and developmental (the process of development, which occurs continually). Each person variable is interconnected and dependent upon the others, working in congruence to achieve balance (Heyman & Wolfe, 2000, "Neuman's System Model: Key Concepts"). When any one or more of these functions is out of balance, the individual may experience stressors and potentially ill effects, ranging from something as simple as a bad mood to the development of opportunistic infections or debilitating chronic disease exacerbation (Schneiderman, McCabe & Baum, 1992, p. 1). Helping future nurses understand their role as facilitators of a healthy, stress-reduced environment will assist the nurse leader in recruiting future nurses with a purpose and paradigm that meets the needs of all.
The Neuman model is particularly helpful in its emphasis on balancing the technical aspects of nursing with the more social aspects that often draw individuals to the profession. Holistic care is a current trend in nursing, but it also calls to mind the real nature of nursing as a caring profession—a pull for many future nurses. In most nursing settings the focus of work is to actively heal the physical, with an almost exclusive emphasis on that aspect of care. In the Neuman model, this would be an irresponsible approach, as it does not acknowledge the whole of the individual and his or her place in the community (Humphrey Beebe, 2003, p. 67; Timko, 1996, p. 173; Polivy & Herman, 2002, p. 187).
The Neuman system theory is an inclusive system, acknowledging nearly every aspect of the individual and his or her environment. The system also clarifies that the nurse's specific role is not to facilitate healing—as that is something the individual must do independently—but rather to prevent additional stressors from affecting the individual by controlling the environment and managing the input and output issues the individual faces while trying to restore balance. The roles of both patient and nurse are clearly defined by the system, and it is the job of the nurse to anticipate needs and opportunities for prevention. The system has even been applied to educating nurses and to a prevention-based model of nursing education (Peternelj-Taylor & Johnson, 1996, p. 23). Stressing this model and others that work toward holistic nursing paradigms is an essential component of the nurse leader as recruiter. Those who already have strong goals to continue in healthcare, with the proper support, bring ideologies grounded in real lived experiences of nursing and medical care; seeking to employ these individuals as nurses will assist in building on the current trend toward holistic health care.
As Neuman (1982) recognized, nurses claim concern with phenomena relating to both client and environment. She identifies stressors originating in intrapersonal, interpersonal, and extrapersonal areas and suggests preventive care and health education programs, asserting that nurses should help "individuals, families and groups" attain a maximum level of wellness (Neuman, 1980) (Sheppard, 1991, p. 29).
The purpose of Neuman's system, and other nursing paradigms, is to create a way of thinking about nursing that is more easily conceived by the nurse, so he or she may more effectively go about the role of protecting the patient from further stressors. Neuman attempts to create a context where nurses can easily understand the reasons for their actions and anticipate the needs of the patient on a multifaceted scale.
Nurse leaders are an essential link in the chain of recruitment of future nurses, as they clearly embody the past, present, and future of nursing itself and have insights not available anywhere else. This is true of real experiential nursing and theory, as well as current and future trends in the field.
You’re 34% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.