Nursing Education and Professional Organizations in the US
This paper examines the role of major U.S. nursing professional organizations — the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN), the American Nurses Association (ANA), the American Organization of Nurse Executives (AONE), and the National League for Nursing (NLN) — in advancing or hindering a unified entry-level educational system. The paper reviews primary workforce challenges including increasing demand, slow growth in nurse supply, and an aging nursing workforce. It also analyzes delegation principles, credentialing trends, Magnet Hospital standards, and hallmarks of professional nursing practice environments. The paper concludes with a proposal for national accreditation standards as a means of addressing the lack of educational standardization across the profession.
- Introduction and Objective: Research questions and scope of paper
- Primary Workforce Challenges in Nursing: Demand, supply, and aging workforce problems
- Scopes, Standards, and the Magnet Program: Magnet Hospital study and ANA program framework
- Hallmarks of the Professional Nursing Practice Environment: Eight hallmarks of professional nursing excellence
- Delegation: Joint Statement and Policy Considerations: ANA and NCSBN joint delegation policy
- Principles and Elements of Effective Delegation: Ten principles and eight elements of nurse delegation
- Credentialing, Workforce Bifurcation, and Conclusion: Bimodal workforce trends and accreditation proposal
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Grounds every major claim in direct citations from authoritative professional organizations, lending institutional credibility throughout.
- Systematically addresses both sides of the workforce equation — demand pressures and supply constraints — before moving to policy solutions.
- Uses numbered lists to present multi-part policy frameworks (delegation principles, hallmarks, policy considerations) in a clear, parallel structure that aids readability.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates synthesis across multiple primary sources — organizational white papers, joint statements, and academic reports — to build a cumulative argument about systemic failures in nursing education standardization. Rather than relying on a single authority, the writer triangulates evidence from the AACN, ANA, and Holmes (2008) to show consistent patterns in workforce bifurcation and credentialing gaps, then uses those patterns to justify a policy recommendation.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with an explicit statement of objectives and a research question, then moves through background context (nursing shortage), organizational standards (Magnet, Hallmarks), policy frameworks (delegation principles), and workforce data (credentialing and bimodal workforce trends). The conclusion returns to the opening question and offers a concrete proposal — national accreditation standards — tying the analytical sections back to the paper's central purpose. This objective-to-recommendation arc is characteristic of a policy-oriented research paper.
Introduction and Objective
The objective of this paper is to examine whether national professional organizations — specifically the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN), the American Nurses Association (ANA), the American Organization of Nurse Executives (AONE), and the National League for Nursing (NLN) — have advanced or hindered efforts to unify the nursing educational system. This paper further relates the policies and activities of these four organizations to the role and expectations of a professional organization, defines the nature of their membership and policymaking bodies, and evaluates the effect of those bodies on entry-level higher education.
A secondary focus considers clinical professions such as medicine, dentistry, pharmacy, and audiology, which require pre-professional education in a four-year liberal arts and science undergraduate program. In these disciplines, the first degree for professional education begins at the master's or doctoral level. Preparation for pharmacy, for example, now requires a six-year doctoral program. This paper addresses whether a similar approach represents a viable solution for initiating a unified system of entry-level nursing education, and offers a proposal in response.
The American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) recognizes that the shortage of faculty in schools of nursing with baccalaureate and graduate programs is a continuing and expanding problem. Over the past several years, the deficit of faculty has reached critical proportions as the current faculty workforce rapidly approaches retirement and the pool of younger replacement faculty shrinks. The United States is presently experiencing an unprecedented shortage of registered nurses, a shortage expected to persist because of increasing demand for healthcare as baby boomers approach retirement and the nursing workforce continues to age (American Association of Colleges of Nursing, 2005).
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.