This paper presents observations and interviews from three nursing home facilities representing different socioeconomic tiers in a single community. Despite differences in cost and amenities, staff across all three facilities shared similar educational backgrounds, pay scales, and workplace challenges. The central finding is that communication — not understaffing as initially hypothesized — emerged as the most pressing issue. Staff members described breakdowns between physicians, residents, and families, compounded by residents' cognitive and health limitations. The paper concludes with a leadership recommendation for a structured, roundtable communication model to address these gaps in all nursing home settings.
The paper uses qualitative triangulation: observations from three facilities at different income levels are compared against one another and then validated with peer-reviewed literature and policy sources. This cross-comparison strengthens claims that might otherwise read as anecdotal.
The paper opens with a community profile establishing socioeconomic context, then moves to staffing observations before pivoting to the communication finding. It builds from description to analysis to policy-grounded recommendation, following a problem-solution arc typical of applied healthcare writing. The conclusion proposes a roundtable model as a practical intervention, giving the paper clear actionable closure.
The local area has an interesting blend of nursing homes shaped by the socioeconomic makeup of the community. Parts of the community are incredibly wealthy, and there is an upscale retirement community in the area with an on-site nursing home that allows residents to transition from independent living into an assisted living environment. However, the community also includes areas of extreme poverty, and one of the nursing homes clearly draws from that population, offering a no-frills setting. The community also has a nursing home facility that would be considered standard middle-class.
Interestingly, the staff at all three nursing homes appeared very similar in composition. They were almost all minorities — predominantly African-American — working in an area that is largely white and Hispanic. Interviews were conducted with staff from each facility: one who worked at the lower-income facility, one at the mid-income facility, and one at the upper-income facility. The staff shared very similar educational backgrounds regardless of the facility. Moreover, pay across the three facilities was comparable, though the ratio of patients to staff was noticeably lower at the most expensive facility.
Given some of the other problems that staff members discussed and what was observed during facility visits, understaffing appeared likely to be the most common concern raised by nursing home workers. However, when staffing issues were explored directly with interviewees, none of them felt that staffing was the problem it appeared to be from an outside perspective. The busyness that seemed to suggest understaffing was, in fact, something that all three staff members described as a sign of productivity in care work.
One staff member at the upper-income facility actually felt there was a surplus of staff at her location, and that idleness among workers sometimes led to certain employees failing to take responsibility for their assigned duties. This perspective challenged initial assumptions and shifted the focus of inquiry toward other issues in the facilities.
All three staff members identified communication as a significant issue at their respective facilities. They described situations in which doctors were not always clear about communicating care guidelines to patients, leaving staff to mediate between physicians and families in ways that complicated their roles. Patients and family members would frequently express concerns to familiar staff members that they would not bring directly to doctors, placing nursing home workers in a difficult intermediary position.
This challenge is well recognized within the broader healthcare community. As noted by AARP, "Communication among families is so important that Medicaid and Medicare nursing homes are required to allow families to form councils that meet privately in the facility" (AARP, 2007). The existence of such a regulatory requirement underscores how pervasive and consequential communication breakdowns in nursing home settings can be.
The staff members made it clear that communication issues were further complicated by family relationships and the health conditions of residents themselves. In many cases, residents in nursing homes are unable to meaningfully or reliably communicate with staff due to dementia, strokes, or other health conditions. Family members therefore attempt to convey residents' needs, habits, behaviors, and moods to nursing home staff (Palmer, 2012).
This process is sometimes further complicated when a resident's expressed wishes or behaviors contradict what family members have reported. In such cases, staff face uncertainty about the appropriate course of action to take in the best interest of the patient's well-being, highlighting a genuine ethical and practical challenge inherent to long-term care settings.
As a community healthcare leader, the appropriate response to these findings would be to ensure that each facility has an established, structured mechanism for facilitating communication among staff, patients, and family members. While such mechanisms are required in facilities that accept Medicaid and Medicare, they are often not fully developed in practice. Furthermore, more expensive facilities frequently make little effort to implement a comprehensive communication approach, perhaps assuming their higher staffing ratios and resources make it unnecessary.
You’re 84% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.