OCSE-N Scale: Measuring Nurses' Coping Self-Efficacy
This paper reviews a study by Pisanti (2008) that developed and validated the Occupational Coping Self-Efficacy for Nurses (OCSE-N) Scale, an instrument designed to measure nurses' ability to cope with workplace stressors. Grounded in Lazarus's cognitive-transactional theory of stress and Bandura's social cognitive theory, the study employed item generation through nurse interviews, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, and reliability testing with a sample of 1,383 nurses across nine hospitals. The paper summarizes the instrument's two-factor structure, its correlations with burnout and coping strategies, and proposes an extended study applying the OCSE-N to nurses in major New York City hospitals.
- Introduction to Nurse Stress and the OCSE-N Scale: Overview of nurse stress and study purpose
- Theoretical Foundations: Lazarus and Bandura: Cognitive stress and self-efficacy theories explained
- Instrument Development and Item Generation: How OCSE-N items were generated from interviews
- Study Design, Sample, and Measures: Hospital sample, demographics, and measurement tools
- Results and Factor Analysis Findings: EFA, CFA results and burnout correlations
- Implications for Nursing Practice: OCSE-N links to Orem theory and interventions
- Proposed Study Using the OCSE-N Instrument: Proposed NYC hospital nurse stressor survey
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Clearly situates the instrument within two established theoretical frameworks — Lazarus's cognitive-transactional model and Bandura's social cognitive theory — before describing how the scale was built, which gives the reader conceptual grounding early on.
- Provides precise quantitative detail (Cronbach alpha values, variance percentages, factor loadings) drawn directly from the source study, demonstrating engagement with empirical methodology rather than surface-level summary.
- Connects the instrument's findings to a nursing theory (Orem's Self-Care Deficit Theory), showing awareness of the broader disciplinary context in which the scale would be applied.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates instrument critique and methodology review — a core graduate nursing research skill. Rather than simply describing what a study found, the author walks through how each measurement tool (OCSE-N, CISS-SV, MBI) was constructed, validated, and statistically assessed, modeling how researchers evaluate whether a scale is fit for purpose.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a rationale for studying nurse stress, then establishes theoretical grounding before moving sequentially through item generation, sampling, instrumentation, statistical analysis, and results. It closes by linking findings to nursing theory and proposing a follow-up study. This mirrors the IMRaD logic common in health-sciences research papers and suits a graduate-level nursing research methods course.
Introduction to Nurse Stress and the OCSE-N Scale
In a hospital or any medical care setting, nurses make up the majority of the workforce and are the backbone of facilitating patient care between physicians. However, between meeting the demands of patients and carrying out doctors' orders, the roles nurses play are highly stressful, which influences their overall well-being. The purpose of this paper is to present findings from a study led by Pisanti (2008) regarding the relationship between nurses and their ability to cope with environmental demands, as measured by the Occupational Coping Self-Efficacy for Nurses (OCSE-N) Scale.
Theoretical Foundations: Lazarus and Bandura
In order to gain a better understanding of the investigation, it is important to comprehend the theoretical foundation on which the study was based: the Lazarus cognitive-transactional theory of stress and Bandura's social cognitive theory. The former holds that certain cognitive appraisals of one's work provoke stress and other negative responses within the work environment. Cognitive appraisals can be primary or secondary.
Primary appraisal refers to one's motivation and "personal relevance of a stressful situation" (Pisanti, 2008) — essentially, the extent to which a person is invested in attaining a particular goal. Secondary appraisal involves the evaluation of coping methods and outcomes in terms of who is responsible for the circumstance, future expectancy or possibility of change, problem-focused coping, and emotion-focused coping — the latter being one's capacity to emotionally adjust to a situation. The consequences of primary appraisal include harm that has already occurred, threat of future damage, and challenge, which represents the potential for growth and progress. The consequences of secondary appraisal stem from the coping tactics adopted to manage internal and/or external demands.
The latter theory — Bandura's social cognitive theory — concerns the validity of self-efficacy beliefs. Coping self-efficacy (CSE) beliefs refer to "someone's self-appraisals of their ability to cope with environmental demands," which "may influence their reaction to stress and its outcomes" (Pisanti, 2008). Research has shown that the stronger one's self-efficacy, the greater the effort the individual invests in a given task or situation, though the degree varies depending on the specific venture or circumstance.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.