Case: Fetal Abnormality

1

In the Christian view, human persons are understood as having intrinsic value and dignity because they are made in the image and likeness of God. This view holds that human life is sacred from conception until natural death, a concept often associated with the Sanctity of Life theory (Lockhart et al., 2023). This theory ascribes moral status to all humans regardless of their abilities, condition, or development. It corresponds to the belief in the intrinsic human value and dignity - every human being, regardless of circumstances, has an inherent worth that must be respected and protected.

2

The case study suggests varying theories of moral status at play: Jessica seems to align with the Sanctity of Life theory. Her belief that "all life is sacred" reflects this theory, suggesting that she may feel morally compelled to continue the pregnancy despite the babys condition.

Marco's perspective is not explicitly articulated, but it could align with the Social Role theory, given his concerns about the potential socioeconomic impact of raising a disabled child. This theory attributes moral status based on an individual's role in society or potential contribution to it.

Aunt Maria also adheres to the Sanctity of Life theory, urging Jessica to follow through with the pregnancy and let "God's will" happen, reinforcing the belief in the inherent value of all life.

Dr. Wilson appears to advocate the Quality of Life theory, considering the potential quality of life for the child and the family. His recommendation of abortion as a medically wise choice indicates his belief in prioritizing the potential well-being and future happiness of the individual and the family.

3

Each theory influences their recommendations:

Jessica, influenced by the Sanctity of Life theory, might lean towards continuing with the pregnancy, respecting the inherent value of the unborn childs life. Jessica is scared by the news, but her inclination is to support the life growing in the womb. This inclination is backed by her religious belief and what could be called a natural motherly instinct to protect a child.

Marco, perhaps influenced by the Social Role theory, might lean towards an action that he believes will preserve their socioeconomic stability and future prospects. Marcos primary concern is maintaining...…ethics, or deontological, perspective, moral decisions should be made based on duty or moral rules, regardless of the outcome or consequences (Misselbrook, 2013). This perspective emphasizes the importance of universal principles, such as respect for all human life and the value of honesty. Given her belief that all life is sacred, her sense of duty, from a deontological perspective, might compel her to continue with the pregnancy, irrespective of the potential challenges associated with raising a child with a disability. Marcos duty as a husband and future father could compel him to support Jessica in her decision, regardless of his personal concerns about the potential socioeconomic impact. His belief in being truthful to Jessica and her right to know could also be seen as a deontological perspective, valuing honesty and respect for her autonomy. From a deontological perspective, her religious convictions, and belief in the sanctity of life, would lead Maria to urge Jessica to continue the pregnancy irrespective of the potential challenges. This aligns with the principle-based approach of duty ethics. Dr. Wilsons duty should be to save lives, as a medical professionalnot…