Mini Case. a-b) The holding period returns for the S&P 500, Wal-Mart and Target over the time period to June 2009 are as follows: S&P 500 Wal Mart Target Holding Period Return Avg Monthly Return Standard Deviation c) d) There was a significant difference between the returns of Wal Mart at the returns of the S&P500, whereas there was a much closer relationship...
Mini Case.
a-b) The holding period returns for the S&P 500, Wal-Mart and Target over the time period to June 2009 are as follows:
S&P 500
Wal Mart
Target
Holding Period Return
Avg Monthly Return
Standard Deviation
c)
d) There was a significant difference between the returns of Wal Mart at the returns of the S&P500, whereas there was a much closer relationship between Target and the S&P. During this period, both Walmart and the S&P showed about the same amount of volatility but they often moved in different directions. In comparison, Target often moved in the same direction as the S&P, but it had quite a bit more volatility.
e)
Allocation
Return
Walmart
Target
Total Return
f) The two-stock portfolio versus the S&P is as follows:
This graph shows the portfolio performing much closer to the S&P – it is still a little bit more volatile, but the returns are much closer, as Wal-Mart's stability helps to counter the high level of volatility that Target has.
The remaining sections cover Conclusions. Subscribe for $1 to unlock the full paper, plus 130,000+ paper examples and the PaperDue AI writing assistant — all included.
Always verify citation format against your institution's current style guide.