EMS is a critical component within the survival of society. Society is predicated on the productivity of each of its constituents. However, as is often the case, these members are susceptible to sickness and ailments. EMS is therefore needed to provide aid to insure the proper treatment of society. Often, life can occur unexpected and without warning. A system is needed to responds to these emergencies in a timely manner. However, as we will discuss, EMS is not always timely. Any delays in the system can result in still further injury or even death. This document will describe the pros and cons of EMS and offers suggestions on how to properly improve the system. First, the essential decision in EMS care is whether the patient should be immediately taken to the hospital, or advanced care resources are taken to the patient where they lie. Often this decision will be in the hands of the first aid provider. Depending on the EMS response time, the individual can literally live or die. In very serious instances, EMS will elect to use the "scoop and run" approach is exemplified by the MEDEVAC aeromedical evacuation helicopter. This allows EMS to respond very quickly to very life threatening medical emergencies. This is a significant pro-to the overall system. The variety of transportation methods can provide aid in a litany of different ways. This diversity of emergency solution can be very helpful when an unexpected emergency occurs. A prime example, of this pertains to the September 11th terrorist attacks. The use of helicopters was pioneered in the Korean War, when time to reach a medical facility was reduced from 8 hours to 3 hours in World War II and again to 2 hours by the Vietnam war. Due to the sheer variety of EMS response mechanisms, New York was better able to help victims from the attack. EMS also uses a technique called the "stay and play." This technique is primarily exemplified by the French and Belgian SMUR emergency mobile resuscitation unit. Although used throughout Europe does provide examples of an improvement that can be made to the United States EMS system.

The strategy developed for pre-hospital trauma care in North America is based on the Golden Hour theory. With this theory, a trauma victim's best chance for survival is in an operating room, with the...

This theory, although controversial in some respects, appears to be true. In particular, cases of internal bleeding, especially penetrating trauma such as gunshot or stab wounds have been found to be best treated when in the operating room as oppose to elsewhere. Under this theory, minimal time is spent providing pre-hospital care and the victim is transported as fast as possible to a trauma center. This theory however has its cons, as a victim often can experience very severe injury and even death waiting for the transport and within the transport vehicle itself. Many critics believe that it is best to provide as much care that is needed upfront so that the chances of survival are better. They believe that each minute that passes, the likelihood of death is exacerbated. This in many instances is true for certain injuries. Increasingly, research into the treatment of myocardial infarctions occurring outside of the hospital have suggested that time to treatment is a clinically significant factor in heart attacks. In essence, the longer the time interval between onset and actual arrival to the hospital, the greater the damage to the myocardium, and the poorer the long-term prognosis for the patient
The aim in "Scoop and Run" treatment is generally to transport the patient within ten minutes of arrival. This coincides with the Golden Hour Theory mentioned above. The "Scoop and Run" is a method developed to deal with trauma, rather than strictly medical situations (e.g. cardiac or respiratory emergencies).

Another con to the EMS system is that it often doesn't take into account the varying circumstances prevailing. Emergencies are rarely the same. People are different. People react differently to treatment. People experience different symptoms. There should be some form of flexibility embedded within the system. Current research in Canada has suggested that door to balloon times are significantly lower when appropriate patients are identified by paramedics in the field, instead of the emergency room. This information is very profound as the current system doesn't allow for proper treatment by paramedics. Instead, their primary responsibility is getting patients to the emergency room.…