This literature review examines academic tenure in American higher education from its historical origins through contemporary debate. The paper traces tenure's development from the early 19th century, when professors served at the pleasure of governing boards, through the founding principles of the American Association of University Professors in 1915, and the impact of McCarthyism on academic freedom. It analyzes two landmark 1972 Supreme Court decisions that defined tenure as a protected property interest, then documents the steady decline of tenure-track positions since 1975. The review concludes by weighing criticisms of tenure in the 21st century, including the "publish or perish" culture, political conflicts, and questions about its continued relevance to academic freedom.
The paper effectively synthesizes multiple sources around a single evolving argument rather than simply summarizing each source in turn. By weaving together legal rulings, historical events, and scholarly commentary, it shows how literature review writing should identify patterns and tensions across sources — for example, connecting the decline of tenure-track positions to both legal changes and shifting cultural attitudes about research versus teaching.
The paper opens with a definitional introduction, then proceeds chronologically through tenure's history before pivoting to legal analysis of the 1972 Supreme Court decisions. A practical section explains how tenure is awarded and revoked, followed by a critical closing section that balances the arguments for and against tenure in the modern university system. This structure — definition, history, law, practice, critique — is a useful model for literature reviews on institutional topics.
Academic tenure is a system that many universities and colleges use to protect a senior academic's contractual right to a lifetime appointment unless terminated for just cause. It is typically reserved for academics who have attained the rank of Assistant or Full Professor, and requires following a strict hierarchical rubric that demonstrates a strong record of published research, teaching, and administrative service. Most institutions allow for a defined period of time to establish this record, although a number of non-tenure-track positions remain available within the university system — Adjunct Professor, Lecturer, Research Professor, and similar roles (Amacher, 2004).
The idea of academic tenure, at least in the United States, is primarily intended to guarantee the right to academic freedom. It protects academics when they publish findings or dissent from prevailing opinion, or when they devote time and research to topics that may be politically unfashionable or controversial. With tenure — and the job security it provides — an academic knows that they can pursue any line of inquiry that interests them, and as long as their research is robust and their publications peer-reviewed, they can safely exercise academic freedom. Additionally, tenure means a professor cannot be pressured by administration or others to adjust grades or curriculum simply to satisfy student enrollment objectives or pressure from alumni (Chait, 2002).
In the early 19th century, university professors had no employment rights, serving largely at the whim and pleasure of the university's Board of Trustees. They were expected to hold certain political and academic views, and were certainly expected to create an atmosphere in which sons of wealthy alumni were able to succeed academically. It was a 1903 case from the University of Texas — in which Professor G.B. Halsted was dismissed after 19 years of service — that accelerated the adoption of academic tenure (DeGeorge, 1997).
Halsted was a supreme intellectual, regarded by some as a mathematical genius, with degrees from Princeton and Johns Hopkins. He began teaching at the University of Texas at Austin in 1884, where he explored the foundations of geometry and advanced mathematics. In 1903, however, he was fired after publishing several articles critical of the university for hiring an underqualified candidate as his assistant. Although he completed his career at smaller colleges, the national attention brought to the case sparked a public debate on the issue of tenure (School of Mathematics, University of St. Andrews, Scotland, 2006).
The tide in academia was clearly changing. Harvard, Columbia, and the University of Chicago had experienced enough interference from donors and governing boards that, by 1915, the American Association of University Professors (AAUP) adopted a set of principles that eventually led to a tenure program designed specifically to protect academic freedom. This framework continued to evolve throughout the war years and beyond.
The tenure system became particularly problematic during the late 1940s and early 1950s, when many academics found themselves at odds with the House Un-American Activities Committee and the policies of Senator Joseph McCarthy. Because universities are often bastions of liberal inquiry, academic ideals frequently came into conflict with the Vietnam War, the social policies of the 1960s, and certainly the political climate of the Nixon years (O'Neil, 2003).
Two landmark Supreme Court cases transformed the legal understanding of academic tenure from 1972 onward: Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, and Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593. Both cases held that an academic's claim to continued employment is, by its very nature, more than a subjective expectation of uninterrupted work — a formal contractual relationship must be part of the employment arrangement. Furthermore, both decisions established that tenure constitutes a property interest in the academic institution, and that due process therefore applies (Beerman, 2006).
You’re 43% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.