Apex Printing Financial Analysis: Ratios & Competitors
This paper presents a financial analysis of Apex Printing, evaluating the company's liquidity, long-term solvency, and profitability through key ratios. It then benchmarks Apex against two major industry competitors — RR Donnelly and Quad/Graphics — across metrics including the current ratio, long-term debt-to-equity ratio, gross margin, net profit margin, and return on equity. The analysis finds that while Apex's profitability surge in the most recent year may not be fully sustainable, the company demonstrates superior financial health relative to its peers, offering the most attractive investment profile among the three firms compared.
- Financial Overview of Apex Printing: Apex's liquidity, leverage, and profitability trends reviewed
- Liquidity and Solvency Assessment: Current ratios compared across all three firms
- Profitability and Return on Equity: Gross margin, net margin, and ROE benchmarked
- Competitor Comparison: RR Donnelly and Quad/Graphics: Debt structure and equity value differences analyzed
- Investment Verdict: Apex identified as strongest investment among peers
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Uses specific numerical data (e.g., ROE moving from 10.27% to 31.05%) to anchor every claim, making arguments concrete and verifiable.
- Maintains a balanced perspective by acknowledging the limits of the analysis — particularly that Apex's recent profitability spike may not be sustainable — while still reaching a clear conclusion.
- Structures the argument logically: internal analysis of Apex first, then peer benchmarking, then an investment verdict, mirroring standard financial reporting practice.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates comparative ratio analysis — a foundational technique in corporate finance — by evaluating multiple firms across the same set of metrics (liquidity, leverage, profitability, and return on equity) and drawing relative conclusions. Rather than analyzing each company in isolation, the author systematically benchmarks performance, which strengthens the argument for Apex as the superior investment.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with an internal evaluation of Apex Printing's financial ratios across two years. It then widens the lens to compare Apex against RR Donnelly and Quad/Graphics on liquidity, debt-to-equity, gross and net margins, and ROE. Each ratio category receives dedicated discussion before the paper closes with an overall investment recommendation. The structure moves cleanly from single-firm analysis to competitive benchmarking to conclusion.
Financial Overview of Apex Printing
Apex Printing has a generally healthy financial condition. The company is liquid, with a current ratio of 1.13. While this is down from the prior year, it remains at a healthy level above 1.0. The long-term debt-to-equity ratio has also declined over the past year. This might indicate that some of the long-term debt is coming due in the current year, so it is important to understand the precise structure of this debt. Nevertheless, bringing the long-term debt-to-equity ratio under 1.0 is a healthy sign for the solvency of Apex.
Apex has been able to improve its gross margin in the past year, which is a positive sign for profitability. Its net margin has also increased, meaning the company has contained its costs to a point where the full improvement in gross margin flows through to the net margin. The result is that Apex recorded a significant increase in its return on equity (ROE), rising from 10.27% to 31.05% — a substantial gain. While in some cases that kind of ROE increase reflects a company with very little equity value, that is not the case here, because the long-term debt-to-equity ratio has simultaneously improved. The ROE improvement is therefore a genuine positive signal.
There are, however, reasons to suspect that these improvements may not be sustainable, particularly because they are out of line with industry norms. Apex jumped significantly in profitability last year and is a much stronger performer in that regard than other firms in the industry. Even if Apex regresses toward the industry mean next year, it will still be a top performer, as its financial metrics remain superior to those of its peers.
Liquidity and Solvency Assessment
To demonstrate this, Apex Printing can be compared with two of its closest competitors: RR Donnelly and Quad/Graphics. All three companies are liquid, with healthy current ratios over the past two years, and there is little immediate cause for concern on that front. However, other metrics reveal that Apex occupies a notably stronger financial position.
The long-term debt-to-equity ratio is one area where Apex stands clearly superior. Apex maintains a capital structure with a healthy level of equity and a sound balance between equity and debt. RR Donnelly, by contrast, is heavily leveraged. In its favor, the degree of leverage appears stable over time, suggesting this may reflect a deliberate management choice about capital structure. Quad/Graphics, on the other hand, appears to have almost no equity value at all. Its long-term debt-to-equity ratio exceeds 900, meaning equity is essentially nil and the firm is financed almost entirely by debt. Although Quad remains liquid, this raises serious concerns about its long-term solvency and makes it a poor investment candidate.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.