Augustine and Diotima: Comparing Concepts of Love
This paper examines the striking similarities between Augustine's conception of love, as illustrated through his depiction of his mother Monica in the Confessions, and Diotima's account of love in Plato's Symposium. Both frameworks understand love not as a mere feeling or possession of the beautiful, but as a dynamic process of engendering — a holy union between the human soul and the ultimate source of goodness. The paper traces how Monica embodies Diotima's principle that love is "of the good's being one's own always," while acknowledging the key distinction that Augustine's vision is grounded in Christian theology, whereas Diotima speaks from a pre-Christian, philosophical tradition.
- Introduction: Love as Union with the Good: Thesis: Augustine and Diotima share a vision of love
- Love as Engendering: Diotima and Monica: Monica as embodiment of love's engendering power
- The Core Difference: Christian vs. Pagan Conceptions: Christian versus pre-Christian frameworks for love
- Love as Other-Centered: Monica's Example: Monica's outward-directed, self-giving love
- Monica's Love and Augustine's Conversion: How Monica's love enabled Augustine's conversion
- Conclusion: A Shared Vision of Love: Both thinkers see love as holy, engendering union
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper opens with a precise, well-chosen quotation that anchors its central thesis and frames the entire comparative argument from the first sentence.
- It uses Monica as a sustained, concrete case study to ground an otherwise abstract philosophical comparison, making the argument accessible and textually supported.
- The paper honestly acknowledges the key difference between its two sources — the Christian versus pre-Christian context — while still arguing persuasively for their essential similarity.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates comparative philosophical analysis: it places two texts from different traditions (Plato's Symposium and Augustine's Confessions) in dialogue with each other, identifying shared conceptual structures while carefully noting contextual differences. Direct quotation from primary sources is used to support each claim rather than relying on paraphrase alone.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a clear classical essay structure: an introduction establishing the thesis, a series of body paragraphs that build the comparison through thematic analysis (engendering, other-centeredness, Monica's influence on Augustine), a paragraph addressing the key difference between the two conceptions, and a conclusion that synthesizes the argument. Each paragraph advances a distinct aspect of the central claim.
Introduction: Love as Union with the Good
In the Symposium, Socrates repeats the words of Diotima that love "is of the good's being one's own always" (Symposium 268). These words essentially get to the heart of Augustine's own feelings towards his mother Monica, who would be recognized by the Church as a saint. As Augustine observes, she was faithful to God all her life, dutiful to her husband, careful of her children, and always laboring to serve God's servants. Through her actions she showed herself to be in love with God, full of the spirit of God, and in possession of the good. If love is of the good's being one's own always, as Diotima suggested, Monica was certainly the personification of love. This paper will show that Augustine's conception of love has much more in common with Diotima's than it has differences, for both get to the heart of love as a union between the source of all goodness and the human soul.
For both Socrates and Augustine, love is a kind of holy union with the divine — the ultimate source of all that is good. When one is "in love," one is united to that goodness and possesses it completely and permanently, never losing it. Love is also a process of begetting — of engendering, of bringing forth fruit.
Love as Engendering: Diotima and Monica
Augustine observes that this engendering quality of love is certainly evident in his mother Monica, who brought her children into the world, raised them, and even looked after them when they went astray — as Augustine himself did — so that they might return to the good they were born to be a part of. Diotima explains it to Socrates thus: "For eros is not, Socrates, of the beautiful as you believe." "Well, what then?" "It is of engendering and bringing to birth in the beautiful." "All right," I said. "It is more than all right," she said. "And why is eros of engendering? Because engendering is born forever and is immortal as far as that can happen to a mortal being" (Symposium 269). Love produces fruit, in other words. Love produces children, either in the flesh or in the spirit.
For Monica it was thus, as Augustine says in his Confessions, speaking to God: "Such a one was she — Thou, her most intimate Instructor, teaching her in the school of her heart" (Confessions 9.9.21). Monica emphasized union with God and held that this union was all that mattered, even on her deathbed. Augustine recounts that when his brother asked whether she would not prefer to be buried in her homeland, she stated that it mattered not to her where she was buried, but only "that you will remember me at the Lord's altar, wherever you be" (Confessions 9.11.27). By observing how faithfully Monica observed the laws and spirit of God and made them part of her own life — converting her husband, her mother-in-law, and her own children to the spirit of God — Augustine shows that Monica's love is just like Diotima's conception of love: of being one's own always.
The Core Difference: Christian vs. Pagan Conceptions
The main difference between the two conceptions is that Diotima's sense of love is based upon the pagan experience and the natural philosophy of her time. She has no conception of Christ as the Man-God. Monica does have this belief, and thus for her, love is rooted in the Christian religion and in acting according to the example given by Christ — that is, in showing love and patience towards all, so that they might come to believe in the love and mercy of Christ, her God. For Diotima, love is not personified by Christ and consists of a much more abstract notion, though in essence the idea of love is similar to what Monica evinces in her daily life, as depicted by Augustine: love is unconditional, love is lasting, love is faithful, and love is total.
The quality of love is that it is transformative and lifts one above the mediocre and ordinary. For Monica, by possessing the love of God, she became a saint, living her life in the holiness of one who is in possession of love and radiating love in all directions. It is her unwavering possession of this love, her example of love, that causes Augustine to grieve when she dies: he has lost her example in his own life and must now remember her and use her as a guide — that he too might engage in the engendering of love wherever he goes.
Conclusion: A Shared Vision of Love
In conclusion, it could be said that Diotima and Augustine are both of the same spirit in terms of how they see love. They do not see it as a feeling or as a possession of the beautiful. Rather, they see it as a process — a work of begetting, of engendering. They see it as a holy union. Monica had that holy union with God and passed it on to Augustine. Diotima understood this concept intimately even in the pre-Christian era.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.