This paper examines the contrasting philosophical inheritances of St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas, tracing how each theologian engaged with classical Greek thought. Augustine, shaped by Neo-Platonic ideas about an ideal world of forms, remained fundamentally deductive and suspicious of sensory experience, while acknowledging limited Aristotelian influence. Aquinas, by contrast, wholeheartedly adopted Aristotle's inductive method, natural philosophy, and empirical approach to knowledge. By comparing their treatments of deductive versus inductive reasoning, the nature of knowledge, and the role of the senses, the paper illustrates the rich pluralism within early medieval Christian thought.
This study guide is drawn from PaperDue's library of 130,000+ paper examples across 47 subjects.
The paper models comparative philosophical analysis: rather than treating each thinker in isolation, it consistently frames each discussion in relation to the opposing tradition. Augustine's Aristotelianism is meaningful only because of his dominant Platonism; Aquinas's Aristotelianism is meaningful because Augustine's Platonism represents a live alternative. This relational framing is a core technique in intellectual history and philosophy essays.
The essay opens by grounding Augustine's philosophical development in his personal spiritual autobiography (the Confessions), then moves outward to his epistemology and treatment of the senses. It pivots to Aquinas by first conceding scholarly debate before asserting his Aristotelian identity. A brief conclusion ties both figures together as evidence of medieval philosophical pluralism. The argument flows biographically to analytically, then resolves thematically.
St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas stand as two of the most foundational thinkers in Christian intellectual history, yet each engaged with classical Greek philosophy in strikingly different ways. Augustine gravitated toward the Neo-Platonic tradition, while Aquinas wholeheartedly adopted the Aristotelian method. Comparing their approaches reveals the remarkable philosophical pluralism of early medieval Christian thought.
According to St. Augustine, one of the greatest sins of his early life was his love of classical, pagan philosophy. Augustine traces his early sinfulness not simply to crimes of fornication and stealing pears as a young boy, but also to his belief in the superiority of Latin classical rhetorical works over the Christian words of the Bible. However, he did acknowledge the pagan Neo-Platonists who had influenced his thought. In his Confessions, Augustine writes that it was studying the Neo-Platonists that enabled him to break away from the erroneous, heretical teachings of the Manicheans. It was the Neo-Platonists that first made it possible for him to conceive of a non-physical substance that still had value and existence in the created world.
Neo-Platonic philosophy, which stressed the ideal world of the "forms" as intuitively sensed or felt by the soul, provided Augustine an outlet from the common-sense materialism of pure Aristotelian thought. For Augustine, the Platonic idea that there is a higher world of forms than the one in which we currently dwell — but which still resembles that world — provided an explanation for how the world could be created by a good God and yet still possess evil within it. Heaven was a more perfect reflection of life on earth, but still had a correspondence to it.
Augustine's overall emphasis on deductive reasoning can also be traced to the Greeks, as can his belief that grace is always present and must merely be recognized. This recalls one of Plato's Socratic dialogues, where Plato demonstrates that an ignorant slave can be taught a geometric proof through deduction — true knowledge always resides in the human mind, waiting to be drawn out by virtue of humanity's rational capacity. Similarly, in Augustine's Christian understanding of salvation, grace is always there to be drawn out.
It is true that Augustine's stress upon inner sense "bears some affinities to Aristotle's common sense," for it "makes us aware that the disparate information converging upon us from our various senses comes from a common external source" and "makes us aware when one of our multiple senses is not functioning efficiently." Augustine's discussion of the senses thus reflects some belief in the value of inductive or experiential learning.
Yet for Augustine, the senses are more apt to lead an individual astray into temptation. While he allows for some Aristotelian appreciation of sensory experience — avoiding a Manichean absolute divide between good and evil, heaven and earth — his deep mistrust of his old sinning life and the world of the senses makes him fundamentally Platonic rather than Aristotelian in character.
The strikingly distinct approaches of these two foundational Christian thinkers to pagan philosophy — Augustine's Platonic deductivism versus Aquinas's Aristotelian inductivism — and their contrasting views on whether knowledge pre-exists in the human mind demonstrate the rich pluralism of early medieval thought.
You’re 66% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.