Essay Undergraduate 849 words

British, American & European Practices on Artistic Treasures

~5 min read 6 sections Law · International Law

Abstract

This paper examines how British, American, and other European nations approach the ownership, display, and potential repatriation of cultural artifacts. Drawing on Jenette Greenfield's analysis of British law and practice and John Henry Merryman's discussion of American art systems, the paper contrasts the public-oriented but legally restrictive British model with the privately driven American approach. It highlights the colonial origins of major museum collections, the legal barriers British museums face when attempting to return artifacts, and the ways private collectors in the United States create both opportunities and ethical problems for cultural property policy. The Elgin Marbles serve as a central case study throughout.

Key Takeaways

Introduction: The British Mania for Collecting: Colonial origins of British Museum collections
British Law and the Challenge of Repatriation: Legal barriers to returning artifacts in Britain
Art as Public Treasure: The British Model: Art as public but parochially held treasure
The American System: Private Collectors and Cultural Policy: Private patronage shapes American art and policy
Private Collectors and the Ethics of Cultural Property: Ethical challenges of unregulated private collecting
Conclusion: Standards, Empires, and Contemporary Art: Need for standards beyond empire and private whim

✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾

What makes this paper effective

It directly engages two scholarly sources and uses them in genuine dialogue, contrasting the British legal-institutional framework with the American private-patronage model rather than summarizing each in isolation.
The paper maintains a critical perspective throughout, acknowledging both the advantages and drawbacks of each national approach without oversimplifying.
Concrete examples — particularly the Elgin Marbles and the concept of permanent loan — ground abstract policy arguments in recognizable cases.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The paper demonstrates comparative analysis across two secondary sources. The writer moves systematically between Greenfield and Merryman, using each author's framework as a lens to evaluate the other's national context. This technique — setting up a point from one source, then pivoting to contrast it with a second — is a reliable and effective method for synthesizing multiple scholarly readings into a coherent argument.

Structure breakdown

The paper opens with the British context (Greenfield), establishing the colonial origins of major collections and the legal constraints on repatriation. It then transitions to the American model (Merryman), exploring how private patronage shapes cultural policy. The final section weighs both models against each other, raising unresolved questions about private collectors and contemporary art. A Works Cited page in MLA format closes the paper.

📘 Read the full essay guide → Build your outline → Generate a thesis → Generate citations → 📚 More International Law examples →

Essay 849 words

Introduction: The British Mania for Collecting

As noted by Jenette Greenfield in her chapter "British and Other European Practice," Britons have often been noted for their mania for collecting — a mania paralleled in the physical relics housed in the British Museum. The diversity of the British Museum's collection is, of course, impressive, but it is the result of colonialism and the unprecedented access Britons had to treasures all over the globe. The UK continues to be in dispute over many relics even with its European colleagues, as is the case with the Elgin Marbles. Many British archaeologists seemed to regard plundering tombs in ancient Egypt and elsewhere in Mesopotamia as more of a sport than an act of respect toward the idea of learning about the past. This lack of respect has not been entirely extinguished.

5 Sections Hidden · 545 words

British Law and the Challenge of Repatriation145 words

What is particularly surprising — especially in light of recent questioning over the rights of colonial nations to own the artifacts of colonized societies — is that British law still makes it very difficult even for willing British museums to divest themselves of antiquities. The main method of disposal or release is available when museums…

Art as Public Treasure: The British Model110 words

In Britain, art functions as a public treasure, albeit in a very parochial fashion, given that British treasures and artifacts are primarily accessible to residents and tourists rather than to persons in the country of origin that produced the art. This model positions the state as the custodian of cultural heritage,…

The American System: Private Collectors and Cultural Policy120 words

As noted by John Henry Merryman in "Art Systems and Cultural Policy," American museums are unique because of the influence of private collectors and wealthy philanthropists. In America, the artist is viewed as a private person, supported…

Private Collectors and the Ethics of Cultural Property115 words

Merryman acknowledges the importance of private U.S. collectors in assembling collections of cultural importance in both positive and…

Conclusion: Standards, Empires, and Contemporary Art55 words

America may lack the same history of empire and coherent sense of what constitutes a national treasure. On the other hand, this view of art as something not…

View Full Document

Works Cited

Greenfield, Jenette. The Return of Cultural Treasures (3rd ed.) New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

Merryman, John Henry. "Art Systems and Cultural Policy." Art Antiquity and Law, vol. 15, no. 2, July 2010, pp. 99–124. HeinOnline.

Key Concepts in This Paper

Cultural Repatriation British Museum Elgin Marbles Colonial Artifacts Private Collectors Art Law Cultural Policy Museum Ethics National Treasure Art Systems