This paper examines treatment strategies for three distinct clinical pain cases: phantom limb pain following a below-the-knee amputation due to diabetic neuropathy, acute post-operative pain following an abdominal hysterectomy, and chronic non-migraine headaches. For each case, the paper evaluates the appropriateness of surgical, pharmaceutical, behavioral, and cognitive pain management methods. The analysis highlights how the type, location, and acuity of pain determines the most effective treatment approach, and underscores the importance of individualized pain management plans that may combine multiple modalities to achieve optimal patient outcomes.
Chronic pain is an issue that all healthcare providers must address at one time or another. The mitigation of pain is a major factor in whether an individual will be able to heal properly and within an appropriate timeframe. The three cases examined here — pain from a below-the-knee amputation resulting from diabetic neuropathy, acute pain from an abdominal hysterectomy, and chronic non-migraine headaches — involve different levels and sources of pain that must be addressed in different ways. Helping to eliminate pain can involve surgical, pharmaceutical, behavioral, and cognitive methods, and the appropriate use of each is determined by the type of pain, its acuity, and its location.
Originally, this patient's problem arose from diabetic neuropathy, which can itself cause acute pain. The pain the patient experienced before the amputation was real, and pain can remain very real after the foot has been removed. There may be issues at the surgical site contributing to discomfort — scarring that restricts movement, decreased blood flow from a severed vessel, or any number of complications resulting from the seriousness of the surgery itself. While various factors could account for the pain, the primary concern for any pain management professional in this case is phantom limb pain.
Many patients who have lost a limb experience symptoms that have no identifiable physical origin. The brain transmits pain signals via neural pathways, and sometimes it continues to send those signals even when no actual tissue damage is present. Phantom limb pain is experienced by as many as 70% of amputees to some degree (Jeffries, 2008). This type of pain is highly resistant to treatment and can become more acute over time. The preferred approach may be cognitive methods that help the patient address the psychological dimensions of the pain — techniques as straightforward as relaxation exercises to reduce immediate discomfort, or more structured behavioral treatments to reduce the problem over time.
The non-physical nature of phantom pain also makes it a candidate for chemical intervention through the placebo effect, a powerful phenomenon long recognized by physicians. The placebo works by convincing the brain that a medication is relieving pain — a relevant mechanism given that much of the pain from a severed limb originates in psychological trauma. This approach combines both cognitive and chemical treatment elements. Additionally, if there is genuine pain at the amputation site, pharmaceutical pain management may be warranted. The appropriate course depends on where the patient reports the pain and its duration. If the surgical site is healing normally with no complications, the pain is likely phantom in nature. If, however, signs of infection are present, chemical or surgical interventions can be employed to address both the infection and the associated pain.
Any pain can signal a serious problem the body is attempting to communicate. However, some forms of pain carry more immediate danger than others. Acute pain following an abdominal hysterectomy involves a highly invasive surgery with the potential for complications affecting multiple major organs. Unlike the phantom pain of an amputee, this pain may reflect significant physical pathology.
The first consideration is whether reopening the patient surgically is necessary. This would not constitute a surgical method of pain control per se, since it would represent a reinvestigation of the original procedure rather than a direct intervention on the nerves causing pain. Actual nerve-targeted surgery to reduce pain is unlikely to be warranted in this case.
Chemical pain management is the most appropriate primary approach here. Acute abdominal pain following this surgery is expected, given the need to move the bowel and organs and to cut through multiple layers of soft tissue during the procedure. This pain is acute but should diminish naturally over time. A regimen of pain medications — likely strong initially, then tapering in strength as the patient recovers — would typically be required. If pain persists beyond the expected recovery window, infection should be considered, as it is not uncommon following this type of surgery. In that case, antibiotics would be needed to address both the infection and the associated pain.
When a patient presents with chronic headaches that have been determined not to be migraines, there are many possible causes that must be investigated. All four methods of pain relief may be relevant in this case, because identifying the precise source of the pain can be challenging. In some instances, surgery involving removal of nerve tissue may be necessary to alleviate the pain. The patient may require a prescription-strength pain medication beyond what over-the-counter options can provide. Alternatively, the patient may be experiencing chronic stress that causes muscular tension, which in turn produces the headache. If stress is the likely cause, cognitive techniques such as operant conditioning or relaxation training, or behavioral strategies such as distraction and cognitive redefinition, may be appropriate. In many presentations, a combination of several pain management approaches will be needed.
In this case, the logical first step is to relieve the immediate pain through chemical means, and then investigate its underlying cause in order to develop a longer-term pain management plan. Through a detailed discussion of the patient's pain history and lifestyle, the clinician can work toward identifying the root cause. If stress appears to be the primary driver, cognitive and behavioral methods can be employed to help the patient manage the condition (Mayo Clinic, 2011). The patient may benefit from learning techniques such as distraction or guided imagery. Because the problem is often psychological in origin, referral to a psychiatrist or psychologist may be an important component of the pain management plan. However, if a psychological cause cannot be identified, a physical etiology must be pursued and a surgical solution may ultimately be necessary.
"Multi-modal treatment for chronic headache pain"
WebMD. (2010). Diabetic neuropathy — Treatment overview. Retrieved from http://diabetes.webmd.com/tc/diabetic-neuropathy-treatment-overview
You’re 86% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.