This court observation paper documents the author's experience sitting in on cases in Judge Mark Gonzales's courtroom at Greeley County Courthouse. The paper describes five cases involving minors in possession of alcohol, vandalism, and assault, examining the judge's sentencing practices, courtroom procedures, and demeanor. Through detailed case narratives and personal reflection, the author explores how judges balance authority with fairness, the importance of respect in legal proceedings, and the real-world functioning of the criminal justice system beyond textbook descriptions.
I went to Greeley Courthouse to complete my court observation assignment for criminal justice class. Upon arrival, I asked the front desk staff whether I could observe court cases. They informed me that I could sit in on proceedings but had to remain quiet and refrain from using my phone. They directed me to Judge Mark Gonzales's courtroom in Division 14, located in the west plaza building on 10th Avenue.
While waiting to enter the courtroom, I researched the judge's background. I discovered that Judge Gonzales was appointed to his position in January 2009. He holds an undergraduate degree from the University of Northern Colorado (1994) and a Juris Doctor degree from the University of Denver (2000). Prior to his judicial appointment, he served as a Weld County Deputy District Attorney, Greeley Assistant City Attorney, and worked in both private and corporate law. He also served on the Nineteenth Judicial District Judicial Nominating Commission and currently holds the position of vice president of the Weld County Bar Association. His professional background demonstrated substantial legal expertise and judicial experience before taking the bench.
Before observing, I looked up the definition of magistrate judge to better understand the court's jurisdiction. A magistrate judge is a civil officer or lay judge who administers the law, particularly one who conducts a court dealing with minor offenses and holds preliminary hearings for more serious cases. This definition helped me understand why the docket consisted primarily of minor criminal matters and why certain cases required additional court dates for more complex proceedings.
The first case of the day involved a minor in possession of alcohol. The bailiff called the defendant, Nate M., who came forward with his mother. Judge Gonzales asked Nate how he pled, and he responded with a guilty plea. The judge ordered Nate to pay a $550 fine, complete 20 hours of community service by a specified date, and attend an underage drinking class. The judge informed both Nate and his mother that failure to complete these conditions would result in greater consequences.
The next two cases involved the same charge—minors in possession of alcohol—and Judge Gonzales imposed similar sentences of fines, community service hours, and mandatory attendance at an underage drinking education class. The consistency in sentencing demonstrated a standardized approach to these relatively routine violations.
A particularly memorable case involved two young women accused of keying a car belonging to a coach at Roosevelt High School in Johnstown. Judge Gonzales explained the relevant law and the coach's complaint. What struck me most was the judge's assessment that because the crime appeared premeditated, it could constitute a felony if the defendants were found guilty. This detail illustrated how judicial discretion and legal definitions can substantially affect a case's severity.
Judge Gonzales asked each girl separately whether she wanted to plead guilty or not guilty. Both chose to plead not guilty. The first defendant was noticeably larger and intimidating; I observed her giving the second defendant a harsh look before approaching the judge's bench. Her demeanor seemed designed to intimidate rather than convey confidence.
The second defendant, Kayla, appeared visibly nervous—the kind of nervousness one experiences even when knowing oneself to be innocent but feeling guilty when confronted. She struck me as a good student caught in trouble for the first time. She explained that the car belonged to her soccer coach, that she was a varsity player, and that she had a positive relationship with the coach and would never commit such an act. The judge set a future court date to continue the proceedings, explaining that because both defendants entered not guilty pleas, the case required further development.
The next case involved a young man charged with a fight at school. His demeanor was clearly reluctant; he kept his head down and spoke minimally. However, he consistently showed the judge respect, responding with "Yes, sir" and "No, sir." The judge ordered him to pay a fine and placed him back on probation, noting this was not his first offense. The case highlighted how repeat violations can lead to escalated consequences.
"Assault case and probation conditions"
The courtroom itself was orderly and respectful. Parents and defendants were present, and the strict prohibition on phones was clearly communicated and enforced. Judge Gonzales's command of legal terminology and evident expertise in the law were apparent, even when his language included terms unfamiliar to me. Beyond judicial demeanor, I noticed that parental involvement and engagement told a story: the concerned mother in the first case clearly cared about her son's wellbeing, visibly distressed by the fine. These human details revealed how the family structure and parental support intersect with criminal justice outcomes.
Sitting in the courthouse was an invaluable experience. Beyond fulfilling an assignment, it gave me direct exposure to the criminal justice system and court operations that textbooks alone cannot convey. I learned that judges are fair when treated with respect. In contrast, disrespect leads to serious consequences. This observation—simple as it may sound—crystallized my understanding of judicial authority and the importance of proper courtroom conduct. The experience transformed abstract concepts into lived reality and deepened my appreciation for the judicial system's role in maintaining order and fairness.
You’re 90% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.