This paper examines René Descartes' systematic method of doubt as applied to sensory beliefs, dreaming, and the existence of the physical world. Beginning with Descartes' observation that poor viewing conditions can mislead the senses, the paper traces his argument through the dreaming problem—the impossibility of distinguishing waking experience from dreams—to his conclusion that all sensory beliefs are open to doubt. The paper then considers the limits of this argument, explores Descartes' mind-body dualism, and explains how the famous cogito ("I think, therefore I am") provides the one belief that survives radical doubt. The essay concludes with a brief critical reflection on the overall persuasiveness of Descartes' position.
René Descartes, in his writings, revealed that he had accepted many false beliefs during his life. These false beliefs influenced numerous other beliefs he held. His goal, therefore, was to sort through his entire belief system, identify which beliefs were questionable, and locate a secure foundation — beliefs he could trust as representing truth beyond all doubt.
Many of Descartes' beliefs were based on his senses. He therefore began his inquiry by questioning whether sensory beliefs could be trusted at all, concluding that it was both possible and reasonable to doubt them. He started by noticing that when viewing conditions were poor — such as in dim lighting or when objects were too far away to be seen clearly — his senses could easily mislead him.
This observation gave Descartes a reason to doubt the sensory beliefs he had formed under poor conditions. However, it did not yet give him reason to doubt all sensory beliefs. Perhaps beliefs formed under better conditions were reliable, he reasoned. The argument from poor viewing conditions alone was insufficient to support sweeping philosophical skepticism about the senses.
Descartes also recalled that sometimes, while dreaming, he had falsely believed himself to be awake. On reflection, he doubted that he could ever reliably determine whether or not he was dreaming at any given moment. He therefore doubted whether he could truly perceive his own hands — perhaps he was merely dreaming about them. Crucially, if he were dreaming, everything would appear exactly as it would if he were awake.
One might object that a person could simply test whether they are dreaming by pinching themselves or checking whether their eyes are open. Descartes himself acknowledged this kind of response: "At the moment my eyes are certainly wide awake when I look at this piece of paper; I shake my head and it is not asleep; as I stretch out and feel my hand I do so deliberately, and I know what I am doing. All this would not happen with such distinctness to someone asleep."
Yet Descartes rejected this objection: "Indeed! As if I did not remember other occasions when I have been tricked by exactly similar thoughts while asleep! As I think about it more carefully, I see plainly that there are never any sure signs by means of which being awake can be distinguished from being asleep."
Descartes thus concluded that any experience one can have while awake can, in principle, also occur while dreaming. No reliable test exists by which a person can determine whether they are dreaming. The possibility of dreaming is always present, and therefore one can never be fully certain of being truly awake. This dreaming argument extended doubt to all sensory beliefs, regardless of how favorable the viewing conditions appeared to be.
"General truths survive even radical sensory doubt"
"The cogito and mind-body interaction problem explained"
"Writer evaluates Descartes' skeptical conclusions"
You’re 46% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.