This paper analyzes whether the Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) degree represents a genuine clash of culture, power, and politics within nursing education. It traces the DNP's origins as a bridge between master's-level and research-focused doctoral education, examines its intended role in addressing faculty shortages and expanding nurses' clinical responsibilities, and evaluates both support for the degree as a tool for professional parity and critical concerns about its academic legitimacy, financial burden, and hybrid nature. The paper concludes that despite controversy, the DNP may address critical gaps in healthcare delivery and nursing leadership.
When first instituted, the DNP (Doctor of Nursing Practice) degree was designed to address a significant gap within the nursing profession. The profession needed greater preparation of nurses to enter an increasingly complex and technologically sophisticated medical environment while still staying true to nursing's practice-based focus. Before the DNP, nurses had limited options: they could remain at the master's level of education or pursue a PhD, which is research-focused rather than practice-focused. The DNP was designed to bridge this gap for nurses who wished to remain in clinical practice yet gain greater grounding in evidence-based medicine.
Today, the DNP has gained considerable support within the profession. As noted by researchers, it is "seen by some as a symbol of social progressivism...better parity with other practice disciplines such as medicine, audiology, physical therapy, and pharmacy, which all require a doctoral degree for entry into practice" (Bellini 2012:6). The DNP is not without precedent in other fields and can be seen as another step toward professional parity—a demand that nursing be regarded as an equal to, rather than as an auxiliary to, other fields of medicine. The degree maintains the patient-focused approach central to all nursing education while grounding it in the core principles of nursing theory and infusing those principles with greater academic rigor.
Proponents of the DNP argue that the degree serves multiple critical functions in modern healthcare. The nursing profession increasingly expects nurses to take on managerial and diagnostic responsibilities once reserved for physicians. As healthcare systems evolve, nurses must develop broader competencies. "In relation to the goals for health care reform, the need for advanced practice nurses with an additional skill set encompassing policy making, quality improvement, and evidence-based practice is clear" (Bellini 2012:6).
Perhaps most pressingly, the United States faces a severe shortage of qualified nurse educators. Despite strong demand for nursing education and growing numbers of individuals wishing to enter the profession, many qualified applicants are turned away from nursing schools due to insufficient qualified instructors. Advocates emphasize that "the preparation of more nurses holding doctoral degrees will expand the pool of educators qualified to teach at the [university] level, so important to replace the large number of nurse educators expected to retire in the next few years" (Bellini 2012:6). The DNP also addresses broader healthcare workforce challenges: nursing shortages and physician shortages create gaps that advanced practice nurses can help fill, particularly in primary care.
Critics of the DNP raise several substantive objections to its structure and value. They argue that master's-level preparation is adequate for clinical practice and that merging clinical and research components creates a degree that is neither rigorous in research nor fully grounded in pedagogy. "The DNP degree is not intended to prepare educators in the pedagogy of teaching; and DNP-prepared faculty will not be successful academicians at some universities, where a more traditional view of discovery scholarship alone is the accepted norm" (Bellini 2012:6). This hybrid nature, they contend, means the DNP will never be regarded as equivalent to a PhD within academic institutions.
Cost is another significant objection. Nursing students often have families to support, and critics argue that recommending a degree of uncertain additional value represents an "additional financial liability for their own education" while they are simultaneously "saving for their children's" education (Bellini 2012:5). The assumption underlying this criticism, however, is that the DNP offers no meaningful value to patients and the nursing profession. Yet concerns about adequate preparation in nursing, combined with often confusing and contradictory evidence-based studies in the medical literature, suggest that nurses in clinical practice with stronger research literacy and technical training could better understand and apply research evidence—a direct benefit to patient care.
As the DNP degree becomes more established within the profession and demand increases, quality control of degree programs is improving, thereby enhancing the value of the credential for both individuals and the nursing profession. The American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) has now established curriculum guidelines and competency standards for DNP students (Patzek 2010). Unlike master's-level programs, DNP degrees do not require specialization, which appeals to nurses seeking additional credentials and educational experience without committing to a narrow specialty track.
The DNP also offers a potential solution to critical healthcare system gaps. Policymakers and administrators recognize that "DNPs would fill some of the gap left by the ongoing shortage of primary care physicians needed to treat not only the newly insured, but also the growing aging population...at current graduation and training rates, the U.S. could face a shortage of up to 150,000 physicians in the next 15 years" (Bachmann 2011). While the nursing profession also faces shortages, the fact that DNPs require fewer years of education to practice than physicians could significantly help address healthcare workforce challenges.
The DNP is viewed with hostility by some as being neither of clinical practice nor academia, but it may be precisely what American healthcare needs to address the demand for more technologically sophisticated, patient-centric care. The degree honors nursing's foundational perspective while infusing it with technical training that enables nurses to assume leadership roles and perform duties previously relegated to physicians. Despite concerns about professional boundary shifts, the existence of the DNP and those who hold it will ultimately strengthen the reputation of nursing. Rather than representing merely a clash of culture, power, and politics, the DNP embodies a practical response to documented healthcare needs.
You’re 97% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.