This paper examines dysgraphia, a processing disorder that impairs the physical production of legible handwriting. It outlines the disorder's key symptoms, discusses federal legal responsibilities under IDEA and No Child Left Behind, and surveys three broad categories of classroom support: accommodations, modifications, and remediation. The paper then focuses on specific assistive technology tools — including talking word processors, portable note-taking devices, and prewriting organizers — that enable students with dysgraphia to demonstrate their knowledge and participate fully in inclusive general education settings. The paper concludes that teacher-technology specialist collaboration is essential to maximizing student outcomes.
The paper demonstrates the technique of synthesizing multiple sources around a central applied question — how can schools best support students with dysgraphia? Rather than summarizing each source individually, the writer integrates them to build a coherent argument that moves from definition and diagnosis through legal obligation to practical solutions.
The paper opens with a definition and symptom list drawn from authoritative sources, establishing a shared understanding of the disorder. It then addresses the legal framework governing school obligations before shifting to classroom strategies (accommodations, modifications, and remediation). The longest section surveys specific assistive technology tools and explains the two core purposes of such technology. A brief conclusion ties together the educational and legal imperatives, reinforcing the paper's applied focus.
According to the National Center for Learning Disabilities, dysgraphia is a processing disorder whose difficulties may undergo changes throughout an individual's lifetime. It is defined as a disability in which the individual "has a difficult time with the physical task of forming letters and words using a pen and paper and has difficulty producing legible handwriting" (Washington State University, 2002). Symptoms and signs of dysgraphia include the following:
(1) Generally illegible writing, despite appropriate time and attention given to the task; (2) inconsistencies — mixtures of print and cursive, upper and lower case, or irregular sizes, shapes, or slant of letters; (3) unfinished words or letters, or omitted words; (4) inconsistent position on the page with respect to lines and margins; (5) inconsistent spaces between words and letters; (6) cramped or unusual grip, especially holding the writing instrument very close to the paper, or holding the thumb over two fingers and writing from the wrist; (7) strange wrist, body, or paper position; (8) talking to oneself while writing, or carefully watching the hand that is writing; (9) slow or labored copying or writing, even if it is neat and legible; and (10) content that does not reflect the student's other language skills. (Jones, 1998; National Center for Learning Disabilities, 2007)
Newman (1998) states that "learning disabilities can be caused by a variety of factors including genetic defects, injury, or illness. All of the disabilities have a physical counterpart, meaning they are caused by anomalies in physical structures or biochemistry." Dysgraphia is a handwriting disability and, while it may exist in isolation, it occurs more commonly alongside other learning disabilities such as dyslexia, aphasia, dyscalculia, and attention deficit disorder with or without hyperactivity.
Dysgraphia and handwriting disabilities fall under the federal IDEA — Individuals with Disabilities Education Act — as well as the provisions of the No Child Left Behind Act, which requires that all students with learning disabilities be educated in the least restrictive environment and included in the general classroom. Teachers must follow the Individualized Education Plan (IEP), which is designed to address students with special needs.
Methods of providing assistance to students with dysgraphia include: (1) accommodations to reduce the impact that writing has on the student's learning or expression of what has been learned, without making substantial changes to the process or the product; (2) modifications to assignments or expectations in order to meet the individual student's learning needs; and (3) remediation to provide instruction and opportunities for making improvements in handwriting skills. (Jones, 1998)
Jones (1998) notes that when considering accommodations or modifications for a student with dysgraphia, the teacher should consider making changes to: (1) the rate at which written work is produced; (2) the volume of work to be produced; (3) the complexity of the writing task; (4) the tools used to produce the written work; and (5) the format of the work.
While the assistive and adaptive technologies available to support students with dysgraphia do not offer a cure, these tools do compensate and allow individuals with dysgraphia to demonstrate their intelligence and knowledge (Washington State University, 2002). Quenneville (2001) states: "The potential for assistive technology in general education classrooms for students with disabilities is great. Its benefits include enhancing academic achievement in written expression, reading, mathematics, and spelling; improving organization; and fostering social acceptance." Quenneville further notes that assistive technology "provides many benefits by facilitating writing for students with learning disabilities who often find the writing process frustrating." When opportunities are provided to accommodate writing challenges, students with dysgraphia "are more successful in the general education classroom" (Quenneville, 2001). Collaboration between classroom teachers and technology specialists is essential.
Assistive technology has two primary purposes: (1) to augment an individual's strengths, thereby counterbalancing the effect of the disability; and (2) to provide an alternative mode of performing a task (Quenneville, 2001). Assistive technology may either replace an ability the student does not possess or provide necessary support for task completion due to an impairment.
You’re 60% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.