This paper compares three leading Electronic Medical Records (EMR) software applications—AllScripts, ChartLogic, and eClinicalWorks—across key evaluation criteria including delivery model (licensed vs. SaaS), hardware requirements, HIPAA compliance, integration capabilities, usability, and pricing. The analysis finds significant variation in cost structure, with ChartLogic offering the lowest entry price and AllScripts commanding the highest licensing fees. eClinicalWorks leads in document management and workflow design, while ChartLogic offers the most robust integrated practice management. The paper concludes by situating each product within the broader EMR market landscape, noting how vendor strategy aligns with clinic size and automation needs.
The paper demonstrates systematic comparative analysis — a core research technique in applied technology studies. Rather than evaluating each product in isolation, it establishes shared criteria upfront and then applies them uniformly, allowing meaningful side-by-side conclusions. This approach is especially useful in technology selection papers where decision-makers need structured, apples-to-apples evaluations.
The paper opens by establishing the scope and selection criteria, then moves through a multi-part comparative body covering delivery model, technical specs, features, and pricing. Each analytical section adds a new dimension to the comparison before the conclusion synthesizes findings by market segment. The structure is logical and tightly focused, typical of an undergraduate-level applied IT or health informatics course assignment.
As of 2011, there were over 75 different vendors of Electronic Medical Records (EMR) software applications providing solutions to healthcare facilities in the United States alone (Ulutas, Ulutas, & Nabiyev, 2011). The key design criteria for EMR systems are security (Neupert & Mundie, 2009), usability (James, Garrett, & Krevit, 2009), and the ability to integrate with legacy systems (Agarwal, Milch, & Van Kuiken, 2009). This comparison examines AllScripts, ChartLogic, and eClinicalWorks — three of the leading EMR software application providers offering software suites in the current market.
All three applications are first compared in terms of how these companies deliver them — whether through licensed software or over the Internet via the Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) model. Each application also supports databases, requires an operating system, and has varying degrees of functionality and performance. All are HIPAA compliant, which is a major requirement of the U.S. government for all reporting systems (Ulutas, Ulutas, & Nabiyev, 2011). Minimum hardware requirements, pricing, costs, and storage requirements are also included in this analysis.
AllScripts, ChartLogic, and eClinicalWorks are all delivered on licensed software models. Clinics, hospitals, and treatment centers can install each of these applications on their own servers and configure them precisely to their unique needs. Of the three, only ChartLogic also offers a SaaS option, which allows clinics, hospitals, and treatment centers to subscribe to the software application much like a subscriber to a telephone or cable service. Charges are billed monthly, and the application is delivered over the Internet via any browser. This approach to software distribution has the advantage of providing applications that are highly configurable over the Internet, easily customized and accessible, and cost-effective, since only the portion of the application actually used generates a monthly fee (James, Garrett, & Krevit, 2009). The disadvantage of this approach involves security and compliance with HIPAA standards, which can become expensive over time (Agarwal, Milch, & Van Kuiken, 2009). As a result, SaaS-based EMR records management systems can often be more expensive to lease and configure compared to their licensed counterparts.
Each of the applications compared also supports Microsoft SQL Server integration and medical lab integration across thirteen different standards. All three require the Windows NT Server or XP Server operating systems, an Intel-based system with a minimum of 2 GB of storage and 4 GB of memory, and a TCP/IP network interface card.
You’re 47% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.