Future of Data Storage and Security in Computer Networks
This paper examines the challenges and strategies associated with long-term digital data storage in an era of exponential information growth. Drawing on current literature, it surveys the scale of modern data generation, reviews access and preservation file formats, and discusses the Open Archival Information Systems (OAIS) reference model as a core preservation standard. The paper also evaluates criteria for selecting long-term file formats, outlines best practices for protecting stored data integrity, and considers cloud-based and local storage solutions. The review concludes that while the volume of digital data poses significant preservation challenges, a growing body of methodologies and standards offers promising pathways for ensuring data openness, security, and long-term accessibility.
- Introduction: Research scope and literature review methodology
- The Data Explosion and Storage Challenges: Scale of data growth and security concerns
- File Storage Formats and Preservation Metadata: Access vs. preservation formats and OAIS standard
- Long-Term Format Standards and Evaluation Criteria: Sullivan and Rog criteria for format selection
- Protecting Data Integrity and Access Controls: Best practices for securing and backing up data
- Local and Cloud-Based Storage Solutions: Terabyte drives, XSEDE, and cloud alternatives
- Conclusion: Summary of key preservation findings and outlook
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper integrates a wide range of peer-reviewed sources to build a comprehensive survey of the data storage landscape, giving readers a well-rounded understanding of both the problem scope and available solutions.
- It balances quantitative evidence — such as specific petabyte and zettabyte figures — with qualitative analysis of standards and best practices, making abstract technological concepts tangible.
- The use of enumerated lists for storage best practices and OAIS model functions improves readability and helps readers extract actionable information quickly.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective literature synthesis: rather than simply summarizing each source in sequence, the author weaves together findings from multiple researchers (Datt, Rosenthal, Park & Oh, Westra, Zhang & Wang, Sullivan, Rog & van Wijk) to construct a cohesive argument about the relationship between data volume growth, preservation standards, security constraints, and long-term accessibility. This technique shows how to use secondary sources to triangulate a research position rather than relying on any single authority.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a brief introduction framing the research questions and methodology (literature review). The body moves logically from the macro-level problem (the data explosion and its scale) through technical solutions (file format types, the OAIS standard, evaluation criteria for formats) to practical recommendations (data protection best practices, storage infrastructure options). The conclusion succinctly summarizes key findings without introducing new claims. This funnel structure — broad context narrowing to specific solutions — is well-suited to a technology policy review paper.
Introduction
There are a number of problems facing the future of information technology, including the fact that networks are increasingly asked to expand in order to accommodate more and more data. Many experts believe that such increases will mean two things: first, that networks will become increasingly secure; and second, that because of this heightened security, the data contained on those networks will become more difficult to access. This study sought to determine the various processes currently being used to secure data on various networks, and to assess whether that security will — or will not — ensure that data becomes incrementally more difficult to obtain.
To this end, the study drew on the most current literature available to determine whether there is a genuine problem with the way data is currently being stored, or merely a perception that data will remain safe indefinitely. It also examined what steps are being taken to ensure the long-term viability of data currently being collected. Following the review, a summary of the research and its most important findings are presented in the conclusion.
References
Axelsson, A-S. & Schroeder, R. (2009). Making it open and keeping it safe: E-enabled data-sharing in Sweden. Acta Sociologica, 52(3), 213–226.
Datt, S. (2011, Winter). The information explosion: Trends in technology review. The Journal of Government Financial Management, 60(4), 46–54.
Folk, M. & Barkstrom, B. (2003). Attributes of file formats for long-term preservation of scientific and engineering data in digital libraries. Paper presented at the Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, Houston, TX, May 27–31.
Foundations and standards. (2008, February–March). Library Technology Reports, 44(2), 14–19.
Hodge, G. & Anderson, N. (2007). Formats for digital preservation: A review of alternatives and issues. Information Services & Use, 27, 45–63.
Park, E. G. & Oh, S. (2012, December). Examining attributes of open standard file formats for long-term preservation and open access. Information Technology and Libraries, 31(4), 44–55.
Robinson, N. & Valeri, L. (2011). The cloud: Understanding the security, privacy and trust challenges. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
Rog, J. & van Wijk, C. (2008). Evaluating file formats for long-term preservation. National Library of the Netherlands.
Rosenthal, D. S. H. (2010). Keeping bits safe: How hard can it be? Communications of the ACM, 55(11), 47–55.
Sullivan, S. J. (2006). An archival/records management perspective on PDF/A. Records Management Journal, 16(1), 51–56.
Westra, B. (2014). Data storage and backup. University of Oregon Libraries. Retrieved from
Zhang, J. & Wang, X. (2010, October). A novel access control strategy for distributed data systems. Journal of Digital Information Management, 8(5), 291–303.
Already a member? Log in
Unlock the rest of this paper
135,000+ research papers · AI writing tools · Plagiarism & AI detection
7-Day Pass
Does not renew
Get 7-Day PassMonthly
Renews at $12.99/month until canceled
Start MonthlyAnnual
Renews at $99/year until canceled
Start Annual- Unlimited AI writing tools
- Plagiarism and AI text detection tool
Plan details
Unlimited AI writing tools are for individual, non-automated use and are subject to our Terms of Service and abuse-prevention measures.
TextChecker scans: 3 during the 7-Day Pass, or 5 per month with Monthly and Annual.
Prices exclude applicable tax.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.