This paper examines the Government in the Sunshine Act and its requirement that federal collegial agencies conduct open meetings for public disclosure. Drawing on Hall's Administrative Law, the paper compares the Act to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), outlines the statutory exceptions to mandatory disclosure, and analyzes the Act's broader impact on public administration. The paper argues that by keeping citizens informed about government agency activities, the Act encourages civic engagement and active public participation in legislative and community affairs, ultimately reinforcing the principle that an informed public supports more effective democratic governance.
The Government in the Sunshine Act is likened to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) in that both statutes mandate open disclosure of government proceedings. Specifically, the Sunshine Act requires that meetings be conducted as "open meetings" — meaning full disclosure of the proceedings — and applies this requirement to "collegial" agencies. These collegial agencies are defined as any agency composed of more than one member or person (Hall, 2006: 285).
Similar to FOIA, the Government in the Sunshine Act includes certain exceptions to mandatory disclosure. These exceptions cover procedural meetings that would divulge personal information about an individual, unless disclosure is mandated by an Executive order, as well as business or financial information considered confidential or constituting "trade secrets" by the owner of that information (Hall, 2006: 286).
The Government in the Sunshine Act primarily aims to keep the public informed about the issues addressed and activities conducted by government agencies, representing a significant step toward establishing honesty and transparency between the government and the public. It has a strong and influential impact on public administration because the law encourages citizens to become aware of and take action on issues concerning their community or society — something that is only possible when people are informed about the problems their community is currently facing.
It is through knowledge of and education about social issues that citizens adopt a more active stance toward community involvement, which often results in active legislative engagement on the part of the public. Thus, when an individual becomes more informed through open meetings about a case or issue relevant to them as a citizen, he or she can form an independent opinion based on the information disclosed by the agencies. This law embodies the wisdom that "an informed public makes for easy governance."
By mandating open meetings for collegial federal agencies and limiting exceptions only to narrowly defined categories of sensitive information, the Government in the Sunshine Act reinforces the democratic principle that government transparency is essential to civic participation. An informed citizenry is better equipped to engage with public administration, contribute to legislative processes, and hold government accountable — outcomes the Act was designed to promote.
Hall, D. (2006). Administrative Law: Bureaucracy in a Democracy. NJ: Prentice Hall.
You’re 94% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.