This paper evaluates the current Human Resource Information System (HRIS) structure at ABC Corporation and recommends a path toward full integration. The analysis identifies critical deficiencies in the existing setup, including an outdated system architecture over twenty years old, reliance on paper-based processes, offline document storage, and decentralized employee files. The paper proposes consolidating these fragmented components into a unified, single-vendor HRIS solution that supports electronic workflows, centralized data storage, robust security controls, and real-time module integration. Key recommendations address workers' compensation data management, access controls based on need-to-know principles, encryption, and paperless operations.
This study guide is drawn from PaperDue's library of 130,000+ paper examples across 47 subjects.
This paper analyzes and summarizes the current Human Resource Information System (HRIS) structure for ABC Corporation and examines how its components could and should be consolidated into a single, unified HRIS platform rather than remaining in the disjointed formation currently in place. The existing system is vastly overdue for an upgrade, and some components are insecure or entirely offline — issues that require immediate correction. While the current system may be functional within ABC's operating definition, it could perform significantly better with proper planning and wisely directed investment.
Before addressing how a single-source HRIS system would manifest and benefit the firm, the current inadequacies in design and procedure must be assessed. To begin with, an HRIS system that is more than twenty years old is unacceptable and must be rectified immediately. This is not to say that ABC needs the newest and most expensive system available; however, five years is an eternity in the IT world, let alone more than four times that span. Even if the system has been extensively upgraded over time, this provides little consolation if the underlying architecture and business rules have not been completely overhauled as well. Regardless, the continued use of offline documents, off-site documents, and rudimentary spreadsheets demonstrates either an inability to achieve effective integration or a refusal to invest the effort required to reach that point.
The data fields and information currently tracked are fairly sufficient, although the scope could be expanded to include benefit information, workers' compensation items currently stored off-site, performance review tracking, and compensation management history. The practice of changing employee information "in writing" should be replaced with an electronic request-and-approval workflow. There is nothing inherently wrong with a request/approval model, but executing it via paper and pen is unnecessary in today's HR environment. Similarly, the use of Excel worksheets for training, development, and compensation management should be migrated to an integrated system.
The workers' compensation situation warrants particular attention. Even when workers' compensation administration is handled off-site by a third party, all relevant employee claims data and related information should also be retained on-site. Relying solely on a third-party vendor to hold this information is problematic — their data retention practices, especially after their services are no longer engaged, may not be followed rigorously or may cover only a limited period.
The practice of employee relations staff maintaining paper-only documents stored exclusively in locked offices must also end. Those documents should be secured and viewable only on a need-to-know basis, but they must be stored electronically. A locked filing cabinet is not an adequate security measure — it is only a physical barrier away from being accessed by unauthorized employees, cleaning crews, or identity thieves who happen to be in the building.
Similarly, all employee files should be stored, updated, and accessed from a centralized location rather than being dispersed among individual managers (Zoho, 2014). Centralization is essential so that authorized personnel can access records even when the responsible manager is unavailable. This becomes critically important during events such as harassment investigations or when a manager departs abruptly. Access should always be governed by need-to-know principles, but there should never be a scenario in which authorized decision-makers — including remote access when necessary — are unable to retrieve the information they require.
"Single-vendor approach and cross-platform integration"
"Access controls, encryption, and paperless data storage"
Most companies need a single HRIS system that can handle all requirements, operate in a mostly or entirely paperless format, and ensure that mistakes or delays do not result from lack of processing power or incomplete information updates. Personnel within the firm may resist changes to their established routines or feel uncomfortable knowing that their work is more readily visible to management. However, just as with payroll and accounting, there must be a separation of duties and the ability to monitor and verify employees' work. Allowing individuals to circumvent security protocols or withhold information they are not entitled to keep private can create significant organizational and legal problems over time.
You’re 57% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.