This paper examines the philosophical foundations that underpin governmental authority and its relationship to the people it governs. Drawing on concepts of human nature, social contract theory, and democratic values, the paper explores why individuals accept governmental legitimacy, what privileges social contracts afford citizens, and how those privileges can be undermined. It also considers the government's core role in establishing governance structures that ensure freedom and security, and identifies ways in which concentrated wealth, power, and media control threaten the value of democracy. The discussion is grounded in liberal and pluralist social contract traditions, with reference to Wolff's treatment of social and political philosophy.
The paper uses a compare-and-contrast structure within sections — for example, setting liberal social contract theory against pluralist theory, and capitalism against socialist democratic organization — to sharpen its conceptual definitions. This technique allows the writer to clarify what each concept means by showing what it is not, a useful strategy when working with abstract political philosophy terms.
The paper is organized into seven sections: an introduction framing the central questions, two foundational concept sections (human nature; social contract), one section covering privileges and their prevention, one section on the government's actual role, one section analyzing threats to democracy, and a brief conclusion. This progression moves logically from theory to application to critique, following a standard analytical essay pattern appropriate for an undergraduate political philosophy course.
Government and its role and power to rule people within a specific territory are core aspects of all political philosophy. This is largely because people generally accept the legitimacy claims made by the governments and states that govern the territories where they live. However, in analyzing the role of government in relation to its rule over people, it is important to explore the concept of human nature, the social contract, and several aspects that impact democracy. These elements are critical to determining and understanding the role of government, given that almost every society has a system of governance in the form of a government or state rule.
One of the most remarkable features of human nature is that human beings are prone to accept authority claims made by the states or governments that rule their respective territories. This general acceptance typically occurs without any effort to determine whether the government's or state's claim to authority is legally justified. Since human beings have an enormous capacity to adapt, the general acceptance of legitimacy claims gives rise to a moral obligation to obey the commands issued by the government or state. Consequently, governments continue to exercise their power to rule and to issue commands and laws that citizens are required to obey.
The concept of human nature can be further understood through the term general will, which refers to people's collective decision to set aside their personal concerns in favor of the joint aim toward the common good.
The social contract can be described as a deliberate, common agreement among all members of society to constitute themselves into an integrated political community and to abide by the laws established by a government that they jointly choose. According to the political theory of the 17th and 18th centuries, the state's legitimacy claims are based on either a real or hypothetical social contract.
The social contract can be further understood through a society's general will — the collective aim of its members toward the general good in all political discussions and actions. While achieving a general will is difficult in practice, it is an important aspect of the social contract because of its orientation toward collective or common good.
One of the major components of social contract theory is that it rejects the notion that the political world consists only of individuals and the state. According to liberal social contract theorists, the individual comes first, and together with others, individual actions create the state through the social contract. Pluralist social theorists, by contrast, hold that society consists of various groups rather than individuals.
First, the concentration of power, wealth, and media control promotes inequality, which negatively impacts the value of democracy. Through inequality, only certain members of society gain the ability to determine systems of governance and make critical decisions that affect people's lives. Secondly, this same concentration portends the dissolution of democratic values by hindering people's right to freedom, particularly freedom of speech. When the major channels of public discourse are controlled by a narrow group, the ability of ordinary citizens to participate meaningfully in democratic life is severely diminished.
The concepts of human nature and the meaning of the social contract are the basis upon which governments are established and their roles determined. While there are various ways that people's power and privileges under the social contract are hindered, the fundamental role of government is to provide governance structures and systems that enable citizens to live in a secure and free environment.
Wolff, R. P. (2012). Social and political philosophy. In About philosophy. Pearson Education, Inc.
You’re 50% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.