This literature review examines information-seeking behaviors in library and academic settings, focusing on two prominent conceptual models: Marchionini's Information-Seeking Process and Kuhlthau's Information Search Process. The paper argues that understanding how patrons—from novices to experts—navigate information resources is essential for librarians to provide effective service. Marchionini's model emphasizes iterative searching with six key stages, while Kuhlthau's framework identifies seven stages encompassing tasks, emotions, and strategies. Together, these models offer practitioners tools to recognize individual differences in research skills and tailor support accordingly, ultimately improving information literacy and patron success in the digital age.
Library scientists are confronted with patrons who have diverse backgrounds in library usage and varying levels of experience accessing information from online resources. Understanding how people interact with information and studying theoretical frameworks such as Marchionini's Information-Seeking Process and Kuhlthau's Information Search Process can help practitioners provide better service to patrons. These models offer practical guidance for librarians working with users at all skill levels.
Some patrons walk into learning resource centers fully equipped with the skills needed to intuitively navigate ISBNs, Dewey Decimal classifications, and online databases to find precisely what they need. However, many information-seeking models assume this level of expertise for all users. Savin-Baden and Wilkie (2006) report that "Many information-seeking models approach students as experts, who are completely aware of what they are looking for and who can recognize the correct answer amidst dozens of others" (p. 173).
Other patrons, though, who may not know the difference between fiction and nonfiction, will likely require substantial amounts of librarian assistance each time they visit a library. This observation aligns with Marchionini's information-seeking model. Savin-Baden and Wilkie (2006) emphasize that "There is reason to believe that students who have just started studying a certain domain could better be viewed as novices, who have a general idea about what they are looking for, but still largely depend on the results of their search queries to further refine their search question" (p. 173). From Marchionini's perspective, the information-seeking model should be iterative in design, with each additional component informing previous components (Marchionini, 1995).
Irrespective of the level of expertise possessed by patrons, most people go through a series of steps to find what they are looking for that describe their information-seeking behaviors. These predictable patterns allow librarians to anticipate patron needs and design targeted instruction.
According to Marchionini (1995), the information-seeking process can be broken down into several subcategories: (a) the recognition of an information problem, (b) the defining of the problem, (c) the formulation of a query, (d) the execution of a search, (e) the examination of the results, and (f) the extraction of information (pp. 51–57). This model emphasizes that information retrieval is not linear but cyclical, with each stage potentially sending the searcher back to earlier stages for refinement. The iterative nature of this process means that librarians should expect patrons to refine their questions multiple times before locating satisfactory information.
By contrast, Kuhlthau (1994) formulated her Information Search Process to consist of seven stages, each of which includes tasks, thoughts, feelings, actions, and strategies that students commonly experience. According to Taylor (2006), "The tasks are listed, but only some of the feelings, actions, and strategies are included as examples" (p. 89). The seven stages of Kuhlthau's (1994) Information Search Process are (a) initiating a research assignment, (b) selecting a topic, (c) exploring information, (d) formulating a focus, (e) collecting information, (f) preparing to present, and (g) assessing the process (Taylor, 2006). Kuhlthau's model is distinctive in recognizing the emotional and psychological dimensions of research, not merely the mechanical steps.
"Using models to improve service delivery"
You’re 79% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.