This paper examines the shift in U.S. federal government public policy toward outsourcing information technology (IT) operations. Beginning with a broad definition of public policy, the paper narrows its focus to the growing trend of federal agencies contracting IT services to third-party providers. It analyzes the community-level impacts of this policy change, including effects on employment, private sector development, and service quality. The paper also evaluates institutional consequences, weighing benefits such as cost efficiency, improved resource allocation, and operational focus against drawbacks including reduced data control, diffused accountability, and budget uncertainty. The paper concludes that while IT outsourcing offers meaningful advantages, its risks can be mitigated through careful partner selection and well-structured contracts.
In a general setting, public policy is understood as a set of regulations implemented by the state in order to manage a specific issue within the parameters imposed by current legislation. In a different formulation, "public policy can be generally defined as a system of laws, regulatory measures, courses of action, and funding priorities concerning a given topic promulgated by a governmental entity or its representatives" (Kilpatrick).
The public policies implemented by the United States government are numerous and complex, targeting virtually every field of life, such as education, infrastructure, business regulation, and so on. While all public policies are equally important within a democratic society, some policies attract more public interest due to their applicability in specific contexts or the impact they generate within the community.
Within modern society, fields of recurrent interest for policymakers and their observers include environmental regulations, business regulations (with emphasis on prudence), health care regulation, employment policies, and efforts to regulate the IT sector. In the specific case of technology policies, the government has been particularly engaged given the novel nature of the sector. In essence, policies are still being developed and implemented as the IT field continues to evolve.
In the context of a rapidly changing society and an increasingly demanding public, governmental institutions have come to make greater use of technology in order to improve the quality of their services and create operational and cost efficiencies. However, the integration of the latest technologies within federal institutions is accompanied by a series of challenges, such as increased expenditures and the need for specialized staff.
In order to address these challenges of IT integration in federal agencies, the United States government is becoming more open to outsourcing IT services. Rather than delivering IT operations in-house, it prefers to have them completed by third-party providers in different institutions or even different regions. As a result, public policies within federal institutions are increasingly oriented toward outsourcing.
This shift in public policy generates a series of impacts within the community. Key examples include the following:
Improved quality of public services, as the federal institution outsources IT operations and can focus on the provision of its core services — such as health care, education, and public administration.
Support for the private IT sector, by creating opportunities for further development, increased demand for services, and competition for federal contracts. This supports market equilibrium and the broader growth of the IT community (Auriol, 2009).
A tradeoff at the level of employment opportunities, as positions decrease in the public sector while increasing in the private sector. When a public agency ceases to complete IT operations in-house, it downsizes the staff responsible for those tasks, reducing public employment. Nevertheless, if these operations are transferred to a third party within the same community, more jobs are created in the private sector. Problems arise, however, when operations are outsourced to foreign regions, costing American workers jobs in favor of more cost-effective foreign labor.
At the level of the federal institution, the change in public policy regarding IT outsourcing generates both positive and negative effects. The positive impacts include the following:
Increased operational efficiency, as staff are more focused on completing their core functions rather than managing IT infrastructure.
Increased cost efficiency, since IT operations are completed by a specialized third party, resulting in lower internal costs.
Improved personnel management and operations, as employees focus on agency-centered tasks rather than requiring training — and the associated investments — to operate newly introduced technological systems.
Cost efficiencies through the elimination of redundancies. As IT services are outsourced, the federal institution employs fewer staff for those functions, generating cost savings.
Improved allocation of resources — including people, technologies, and capital — since these are concentrated on fewer internal operations.
Better ability to meet project deadlines and deliver overall operations within more effective budgets, including greater focus on standardization and the enforcement of legislation.
Increased capacity for innovation and improved ability to identify and manage institutional risks (American Council of Engineering Companies of Colorado, 2004). As noted in research on why organizations outsource, the strategic redirection of internal resources is among the most cited motivations for contracting out non-core functions.
"Data control, accountability, and budget risks"
"Mitigation strategies and overall policy assessment"
You’re 69% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.