This paper provides an overview of Katharine Kolcaba's Comfort Theory of nursing, tracing its development from her early graduate work through its formalization as a holistic theoretical framework. The analysis explains Kolcaba's definition of comfort—encompassing relief, ease, and transcendence across physical, psychospiritual, social, and environmental contexts—and outlines the theory's core assumptions. It then examines how researchers have applied the theory in practice, with particular attention to end-of-life care planning in long-term and dementia care settings, as well as pediatric nursing. The paper concludes that comfort theory is especially valuable for vulnerable populations and that its benefits extend to family members as well as patients.
Comfort is an obvious objective in providing quality care in a nursing environment. Yet most concepts of "comfort" are based on subjective or heuristic accounts and have not been holistically explored. Katharine Kolcaba began building her theory of comfort during graduate school and received her PhD in 1997; since that time, her theories have taken root among many researchers. Comfort has been defined in nursing as the satisfaction—actively, passively, or cooperatively—of the basic human needs for relief, ease, or transcendence arising from healthcare situations that are stressful; nursing care is designed to meet, or to continue meeting, needs that fall under the domain of the discipline (Kolcaba, 1994). Kolcaba used this definition to build a framework that could more systematically explore the role of comfort in patients as well as in nursing outcomes. This analysis provides an overview of Kolcaba's theory, as well as some of the applications that have been studied using the comfort theory.
When Kolcaba began to formulate her ideas into what later became comfort theory, previous research had already begun to explore concepts related to comfort. For example, Kolcaba (1992) had diagrammed a two-dimensional map and defined the concept of comfort in nursing. Later, Kolcaba (1994) defined comfort for nursing as the satisfaction—actively, passively, or cooperatively—of the basic human needs for relief, ease, or transcendence arising from healthcare situations that are stressful; nursing care is designed to meet, or to continue meeting, needs that fall under the domain of the discipline.
The basic assumptions of the theory of comfort are that (a) human beings have holistic responses to complex stimuli, (b) comfort is a desirable holistic outcome that is germane to the discipline of nursing, and (c) human beings strive to meet, or to have met, their basic comfort needs. These assumptions underpin the theory of comfort and are in concert with an intra-actional perspective in which the components of a whole-person response are related and assessed comprehensively (Kolcaba, 1994). There are many different facets to an individual acquiring a level of "comfort" during periods of ill health, and these factors must be viewed in a holistic manner. The role of nurses is to minimize patient stress by providing relief, ease, and transcendence across a range of different contexts that coalesce to provide comfort to an individual throughout the duration of their healthcare needs.
Similar to other theories, the health issues are only part of the equation. Comfort theory can also consider factors such as social, environmental, and spiritual or psychological aspects of the patient's well-being from a broader context than just the physical or biological issues that are present (Moriber, 2009).
The first dimension of the model encompasses the relief, ease, and transcendence components. Relief occurs when a specific need is met. For example, if a patient is experiencing pain, they may gain a sense of relief when that pain is mitigated either by addressing its source or by managing it pharmacologically. The next component, ease, can be thought of as achieving a sense of peace or serenity. An example might include a patient who has recently been told to expect a full recovery; this news puts their mind at "ease" and reduces the stress of uncertainty about their future. Transcendence is defined as the state in which ordinary powers are enhanced, and the characteristic that differentiates transcendence from relief and ease is that it designates the patient's potential for extraordinary performance as an end in itself (Kolcaba, 1994).
The second dimension of the model addresses the context in which comfort is provided for the patient. Different interpretations of a person's context may include their physical condition or a broader awareness of their position in life relative to psychospiritual issues, self-awareness, self-esteem, and similar factors (Kolcaba, 1994). A further set of factors considers the social context, including family and support networks as well as financial support, which is largely a social construct. The final factor encompasses basic environmental needs such as light, noise, temperature, and other elements of the immediate surroundings—this is typically what people think of most readily when they consider the idea of comfort.
"Applications in end-of-life, dementia, and pediatric care"
However, despite a general knowledge of comfort care, these results were unevenly distributed across nursing departments such as the ICU, elderly care, and oncology, as well as across levels of knowledge acquired. Another study found that long-term care nursing facilities typically have formal comfort planning procedures in place, though some circumstances make comfort planning even more salient. This study examined patients with dementia and their comfort care goals. The results indicated that families of patients were more satisfied with end-of-life care when a comfort goal was established shortly after admission, and this pattern held only for patients who died within six months of admission (adjusted b: 4.5; confidence interval: 2.8, 6.3 vs. −1.2; confidence interval: −3.0, 0.6 for longer stays); for quality of dying, no such association was found (Soest-Poortvliet et al., 2015). These results indicate that establishing a comfort care goal in the early stages may be important to family members and their satisfaction levels during potentially difficult events.
Another popular application of comfort theory is in the realm of pediatric nursing. Although written protocols are currently directed more toward pain relief than toward the comfort of each child, there is increasing interest in pediatric literature about comforting strategies for children and their families (Kolcaba & DiMarco, 2005). Kolcaba and DiMarco (2005) argue that applying the comfort theory on a positive and holistic basis could increase the effectiveness of nurses in providing comfort to these vulnerable populations. Their study uses a case study of a young patient to illustrate how the principles can be applied to her care. The propositions upon which the comfort theory's pediatric application is founded are as follows (Kolcaba & DiMarco, 2005):
Some patients can advocate for their own comfort levels, but for those who cannot, comfort care provides a solid foundation for maximizing comfort during trying times. Another important consideration is how comfort care can also produce better outcomes for the family members of patients, especially among vulnerable populations such as the young and the elderly. As families continue to participate as proxies in the care of their loved ones, there is an ongoing need to provide care that meets both patients' and families' expectations (Soest-Poortvliet et al., 2015).
Research has also indicated that dissatisfaction among family members and nursing staff involves a complex relationship with many contributing factors, particularly in palliative care settings. Some of the problems identified include inadequate quality and quantity of information, questions about staff competence, infrequent physician visits, and poor pain control (Soest-Poortvliet et al., 2015). However, when staff and family use the comfort theory framework together with good communication, this approach enables proper planning that can mitigate many sources of frustration among family members who expect their elderly friend or relative to be comfortable at all times, to the greatest extent feasibly possible.
This analysis provided an overview of the Comfort Theory of nursing developed by Katharine Kolcaba. Comfort has been defined in nursing as the satisfaction—actively, passively, or cooperatively—of the basic human needs for relief, ease, or transcendence arising from healthcare situations that are stressful; nursing care is designed to meet, or to continue meeting, needs that fall under the domain of the discipline (Kolcaba, 1994). Kolcaba also built a theoretical framework that allows nurses to more effectively address patients' comfort needs and develop strategies to improve them from a holistic perspective. The most widely studied applications identified in the literature focus on youth, the elderly, and other vulnerable patients, and Kolcaba herself worked to customize her theory for such populations. Finally, this theory is relevant not only to the patients themselves but also to their families, who can be reassured knowing that their loved ones are receiving attentive, comfort-centered care.
Kolcaba, K. (1994). A theory of holistic comfort for nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 1176–1184.
Kolcaba, K., & DiMarco, M. (2005). Comfort theory and its application to pediatric nursing. Pediatric Nursing, 187–196.
Moriber, N. (2009). Evaluating the reliability and validity of the pediatric perioperative comfort instrument: A psychometric study. ProQuest Dissertations, 1–136.
Soest-Poortvliet, M., Steen, J., de Vet, H., Hertogh, C., Deliens, L., & Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B. (2015). Comfort goal of care and end-of-life outcomes in dementia: A prospective study. Palliative Medicine, 538–546.
Yan-Fang, H., Ai-Ping, Z., Ya-Xin, F., Xiao-Ning, C., Ling-Ling, W., & Le-Xin, W. (2014). Nurses' knowledge and attitudes on comfort nursing care for hospitalized patients. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 573–578.
You’re 83% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.