This paper explores the legal and ethical challenges facing healthcare facilities, with particular focus on California Hospital Medical Center. It begins by situating the problem within a broader national context, noting that medication errors affect roughly 20% of US hospital cases. The paper identifies specific issues at the facility — customer loss, negative public perception, and a bureaucratic culture of indifference — and proposes a two-part strategy: using anonymous surveys and stakeholder committees to understand root causes and motivate change, and employing outside consultants to objectively measure the plan's effectiveness. The paper concludes by tying these strategies to long-term institutional viability.
Over the last several years, a wide variety of healthcare facilities have been facing a number of legal and ethical issues. Part of the reason for this is that medical errors have been rising at many hospitals. This is problematic because it exposes many organizations to possible lawsuits and regulatory challenges. A clear example of how severe this has become can be seen in a study conducted by the Archives of Internal Medicine, which found that 20% of all medical errors at US hospitals are related to staff members giving patients the wrong medication ("Drug Errors Common in US Hospitals," 2002). Some of the most common mistakes include providing the wrong dosage, omitting medication entirely, and giving patients drugs they have not been prescribed. This is troubling because, if left unchecked, it can cause many healthcare facilities to lose patients and experience a decline in profitability.
In the case of California Hospital Medical Center, the facility has been facing similar issues, including the loss of customers, increasingly negative public perceptions, and a bureaucratic structure that is contributing to a sense of indifference among staff. These factors are significant because they raise the possibility of the facility facing financial insolvency. Addressing these challenges requires examining what resources will be needed to make an effective strategy work and how success will be measured. Doing so will provide the greatest insight into the various ways the hospital can address its ethical and legal problems.
Making any strategy work requires several different resources, including understanding the root causes of the problems and giving staff members reasons to want to change. Understanding the causes of the problem means identifying why these issues are occurring in the first place. To accomplish this objective, anonymous surveys would be administered to both patients and staff members. The purpose of these surveys is to understand the causes of the problems and to surface new ideas for addressing them. This tool will help administrators understand why these challenges are arising and offer possible solutions (Brown, 1992, pp. 18–23).
Giving staff members reasons to want to change involves forming alliances with doctors, nurses, and select members of the community. The key with this resource is to have these individuals serve on different committees that will help support changes at the hospital. Over time, this will transform the atmosphere inside the facility. These people can help give everyone a reason to accept the necessary changes and help identify why certain individuals may be resistant. Once this occurs, it will create an environment in which staff are more responsive to the needs of patients. When this kind of attitude becomes common, medical errors will decline and the quality of care provided will increase (Brown, 1992, pp. 18–23).
"Using outside consultants to assess plan success"
California Hospital Medical Center faces a number of ethical and legal issues, most notably the loss of customers, increasing negative perceptions, and a bureaucratic structure contributing to a sense of indifference. These problems are concerning because they increase the regulatory and legal risks facing the hospital. Specifically, they raise the likelihood of higher medical malpractice insurance costs and a further reduction in the quality of care. Once this dynamic takes hold, it signals that the facility is in a downward spiral of declining care and increasing costs — a point at which it may no longer be economically viable to remain open.
You’re 64% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.