Locke vs. Nozick: Natural Property Rights Compared
This paper compares two major theories of natural property entitlement: John Locke's labor-based theory of ownership, articulated in his Second Treatise on Civil Government, and Robert Nozick's libertarian framework of just acquisition and transfer. Beginning with Locke's claim that individuals own their bodies and therefore their labor—and that applying labor to unowned resources generates legitimate ownership—the paper traces how Nozick extends and modifies this logic. Nozick grounds absolute property rights in the principle that persons are ends in themselves, arguing that any fairly obtained property may be freely transferred or retained. The paper concludes by noting the practical limitations of both theories in the context of modern resource scarcity.
- Introduction to the Property Rights Debate: Historical context for natural property rights debates
- Locke's Labor Theory of Property Entitlement: Locke's labor-based theory of individual ownership
- Nozick's Theory of Just Acquisition and Transfer: Nozick's absolute property rights and just transfer
- Practical Limitations and Modern Relevance: Critiques of both theories under modern scarcity
✍️ How to write this paper — guide & tools ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Presents each philosopher's theory in its own terms before drawing comparisons, allowing readers to understand each position independently.
- Uses direct quotations from primary and secondary sources to anchor claims, lending textual authority to the analysis.
- Maintains a clear through-line connecting Locke's seventeenth-century framework to Nozick's twentieth-century refinement, showing intellectual continuity.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates comparative philosophical analysis: it identifies a shared premise (self-ownership and bodily autonomy) between Locke and Nozick, then traces how each thinker develops that premise differently to reach conclusions about property entitlement and redistribution. This technique is well-suited to undergraduate political philosophy writing, where the goal is to map agreement and divergence across thinkers on a single problem.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with historical context situating the property rights debate from the sixteenth century onward. It then dedicates one paragraph each to Locke's labor theory and Nozick's just-acquisition framework. A brief concluding paragraph acknowledges the practical limits of both theories in light of modern resource scarcity. The structure is linear and argument-driven, moving from historical background through theoretical exposition to critical evaluation.
Introduction to the Property Rights Debate
One of the longest-running and most pressing debates in the realm of political philosophy concerns an individual's right to property — whether there is, in fact, a natural right to ownership, to what degree this right extends if it indeed exists, and how the practicalities of various theories concerning property rights are meant to play out in the real world. This has been a major question since the sixteenth century, with many widely varying conclusions having been drawn through the ages to justify various acts both of monarchies and other existing power structures, and of revolutions sought and carried out — at least supposedly — by the common man. It was towards the end of the seventeenth century that John Locke outlined his theory of property entitlement in his Second Treatise on Civil Government, and his theories have been hugely influential ever since.
Locke's Labor Theory of Property Entitlement
Locke begins with the assertion that all of Earth was granted in common to mankind by God. He further asserts that every individual owns his own body, and that no one else can rightfully claim control over another individual's body. As such, each individual also fully owns their own labor. If that labor is directed towards the collection or production of previously unowned — or commonly owned — resources or property, those resources and properties become owned by virtue of the labor put into them.
A crux of Locke's argument that is especially important today is his belief that "The measure of property nature has well set by the extent of men's labour and the conveniencies of life: no man's labour could subdue, or appropriate all; nor could his enjoyment consume more than a small part" (Locke, V. 36). Thus he believes that it is only through labor, and not through simply claiming, that property can become owned by an individual, and that therefore there should be plenty of property to go around. One might sell their property or hire others to work it, but this can only occur after initial ownership has been established through use. This labor theory of property remains one of the most influential frameworks in the history of political thought.
References
Johnson, R. "Nozick." Accessed 12 October 2009. http://web.missouri.edu/~johnsonrn/nozick.html
Locke, J. (1690). Second Treatise on Civil Government. Accessed 12 October 2009. http://www.constitution.org/jl/2ndtr05.htm
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.