Essay Undergraduate 652 words

Management Accounting Control Systems and Human Factors

~4 min read

Abstract

This paper examines the role of management accounting control systems in organizational performance, focusing on the tension between quantitative performance measures and human motivational factors. It contrasts past-action-oriented control systems with forward-looking steering controls, arguing that the latter are more effective because they allow real-time adjustments and support employee motivation. Drawing on Hyvonen's contingency framework and Accel-Team's management planning research, the paper concludes that flexible, strategy-aligned accounting systems that incorporate coaching, evaluation, and reward mechanisms produce superior long-term productivity compared to purely punitive or retrospective approaches.

📝 How to Write This Type of Paper Writing guide — click to expand

▼

What makes this paper effective

The paper clearly contrasts two control system types — past-action and steering — giving readers a concrete conceptual framework to anchor the argument.
It integrates academic source material (Hyvonen's contingency framework) with practitioner-oriented content (Accel-Team) to support a balanced, multi-perspective argument.
The paper maintains a consistent normative thesis — that human factors must be incorporated into management accounting — without overstating claims or introducing unsupported assertions.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The paper uses a compare-and-contrast structure to evaluate competing control system approaches before synthesizing them into a broader recommendation. This technique, common in management and accounting essays, allows the writer to demonstrate analytical judgment by not simply describing systems but evaluating their relative effectiveness in context.

Structure breakdown

The paper opens by establishing the economic context motivating the discussion, then defines and compares the two control system types. It transitions into the human dimension of management accounting, incorporates Hyvonen's research on strategy–accounting alignment, and closes with a normative conclusion advocating for flexible, motivation-conscious control systems. The argument flows logically from problem identification through analysis to recommendation.

Introduction: Economic Pressures and Management Control

The current economic situation throughout the world has caused great concern among businesses and managers. The drive to remain viable in a volatile marketplace has brought about strategies to cut costs and increase controls, with emphasis on improving productivity. While this is a successful approach in the short term, some authors warn that there are long-term dangers in terms of waning productivity and profits (Accel-Team 2009). At the basis of this danger is the implication that the human factor may be lost by overemphasizing accounting performance measures as the primary determinant of managerial performance.

Types of Control Systems: Past-Action vs. Steering Controls

According to the management control systems literature, there are two broad types of control systems: those that are past-action-oriented on the one hand, and those known as steering controls, which are future-oriented, on the other. The first type generally fails because of its focus on actions and strategies completed in the past, with little possibility of improvement. Employees are made aware of the results of past mistakes without the opportunity to correct them. At best, employees and managers can learn from their previous mistakes and apply these lessons to future actions. This type of control system tends to be demoralizing and demotivating.

The steering control system, on the other hand, provides a climate that is motivating, as adjustments are permitted before the end of the control period. This is a more efficient system because adjustments are immediate and applicable to the project at hand. Both managers and employees are then able to work more efficiently and effectively.

The Human Factor in Management Accounting

Control is a vital function of management planning. It provides information regarding the efficiency and effectiveness of the company. In order to benefit from a management control system, a company needs to integrate its planning strategies with such a system. Another important consideration is the human factor in terms of the management accounting function. Employees are more motivated by evaluation, coaching, and rewarding than by purely quantitative functions such as measuring, comparing, and penalizing. These strategies can be used in combination to extract the highest level of productivity from employees.

1 Locked Section · 115 words remaining

Strategy, Flexibility, and Accounting System Alignment · 115 words

"Hyvonen's contingency framework linking strategy and accounting"

Conclusion: Toward a Balanced Management Accounting Approach

The implication of management accounting therefore need not be negative. It is negative only when implemented with short-term results in mind. Employees and managers alike should work together to ensure the success of the management accounting system. Because it is a necessary part of a company's operating procedure — ensuring that coordination occurs among employees and departments — it should be implemented with best practice in mind.

You’re 62% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.

130,000+ paper examples AI writing assistant Citation generator Cancel anytime

Key Concepts in This Paper

Steering Controls Past-Action Controls Human Factor Employee Motivation Management Accounting Strategic Alignment Contingency Framework Performance Measurement Organizational Productivity Control Systems