This paper examines Karl Marx's philosophical critique of capitalism, focusing on his concepts of labor, alienation, and the "species-being." It traces how Marx adapts Hegelian estrangement to argue that capitalist production dehumanizes workers by severing them from the fruits of their labor. The paper explores the inverse relationship between a worker's productivity and their humanity, the spiritual loss resulting from forced labor, and the implications of Marx's species-being framework. It concludes by turning Marx's own logic against communism, arguing that a classless society contradicts the free-thinking individuality that defines humanity as a species-being.
The paper demonstrates internal critique — using an author's own philosophical framework to challenge the conclusions that author draws. Rather than attacking Marx from an external ideological position, the writer shows that the species-being concept, properly applied, undermines the case for communism. This technique is especially effective in philosophy papers because it engages the text on its own terms before revealing a logical tension.
The paper follows a five-part structure: an introductory thesis that signals the counterargument to come; a section on labor's inverse relationship with humanity; a section tracing alienation back to Hegelian estrangement; a section developing the species-being concept; and a conclusion that applies the accumulated framework to critique communism. Each section builds directly on the previous one, creating a tight argumentative chain.
Karl Marx's philosophy against capitalism and its constituent variables — and his movement toward communism — is contested in its core arguments regarding labor, the worker, and society. In this framework, a worker's humanity gradually diminishes in inverse proportion to the amount of capital accumulated. The result is alienation between the laborer and the products of that labor, a spiritual failing in itself. Capitalism becomes a system of dehumanization, and Marx moves toward a more "humanistic" outlook that borders on communist ideals. There are, however, significant flaws in this position, as the very arguments that attempt to transcend capitalism ultimately provide a compelling case for it.
Labor is divided into two categories in relation to human existence: (1) labor in which one produces less, making the laborer a higher commodity; and (2) labor in which one produces more and therefore sells more, making the laborer a lower commodity. There is a direct relationship between the worker's output and the worker's humanity. Under this philosophical framework, a human worker is devalued the greater the efficiency of production. Thus "the worker becomes poorer the more wealth he produces, the more his production increases in power and extent" (Marx, p. 2). By the same logic, the "worker becomes an ever cheaper commodity the more commodities he produces" (Marx, p. 2).
Why these inverse proportions? This is where Marx begins to indict the economy — a failing capitalist world that has created a vast divide between the wealthy capitalist class and the laboring poor. The more the worker strives to earn capital for his or her service, the more the worker must sacrifice to survive. The meaningful dimension of human spiritual production disappears entirely, as the worker has completely objectified the very fruits of that labor, thereby inducing what Hegel termed estrangement — or alienation.
To better understand Marx's use of alienation with respect to workers and the capitalist system, one must first grasp Hegel's philosophy of estrangement. In Hegelian philosophy, the process of estrangement is a dehumanizing one — it distances what makes humans unique from the human being himself. It is a term that, under specific conditions, defines a human being's loss of self: a loss of the essence of what truly makes one human. Marx adopts this Hegelian concept of estrangement — also called "alienation" — but inverts its conditions to focus on the capitalist failings of the economy.
The inverted Hegelian framework as devised by Marx sees humans as having alienated themselves by surrendering too much of what he calls their "self" — that is, the products of their labor. The laborer produces work and, in exchange, earns capital: that which is needed to survive in human society. This exchange of capital and labor, however, perverts the idea of production and leads to alienation. Lured by the promise of more capital, the worker overproduces and continues to give away the creations of that labor, accepting capital as an adequate trade-off. Greed and capitalist ideals have transformed the worker into a dehumanized person — someone who has lost a dimension of spirituality — and this loss drives the alienation process as described by Marx. "The more the worker exerts himself in his work, the more powerful the alien, objective world becomes… the poorer he and his inner world become" (Marx, p. 2).
You’re 50% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.