This paper examines Robert K. Merton's influential contributions to criminology, with particular focus on his strain theory and theory of anomie. Beginning with Merton's biography and the social conditions — including the Great Depression and mass immigration — that shaped his thinking, the paper summarizes his core theoretical concepts: anomie, the five adaptations to strain, manifest and latent functions, and deviant behavior typologies. It then reviews major critiques and extensions of Merton's work by theorists including Travis Hirschi, Cloward and Ohlin, Walter B. Miller, and Richard Quinney. Finally, the paper documents Merton's enduring influence through citation data drawn from the American Society of Criminology and the Social Sciences Citation Index.
The paper demonstrates effective use of theoretical lineage tracing — showing how a foundational theory (Merton's anomie/strain model) generates derivative theories through critique. By presenting Hirschi's bonding theory, Cloward and Ohlin's differential opportunity theory, Miller's focal concerns, and Quinney's conflict perspective as direct responses to identified gaps in Merton's work, the paper illustrates how academic knowledge builds cumulatively rather than through isolated insights.
The paper follows a four-part structure explicitly signaled by subheadings: (1) biographical and historical context, (2) original theory summary covering the five adaptations and related concepts, (3) critical responses and competing theories, and (4) citation-based evidence of ongoing scholarly impact. This IMRaD-adjacent structure — context, content, critique, consequence — is well suited to a theory-review paper at the undergraduate level.
Robert K. Merton is considered one of the most significant sociologists of modern times, and his contributions to criminology are equally substantial. He influenced fields as diverse as the natural sciences, humanities, law, political theory, economics, and anthropology (Cole, 2004, p. 37). Merton introduced numerous concepts, including anomie, deviant behavior, the self-fulfilling prophecy, strain, middle-range theory, and focused group behavior, and he is recognized largely because of these innovations.
Merton's inspiration was rooted in his own childhood. He was born on July 5, 1910, in the slums of South Philadelphia, the son of Jewish immigrants. His father ran a small dairy shop near their home. Although Merton did not grow up in a wealthy family, he was acutely aware of the cultural resources surrounding him — among them the Philadelphia Orchestra at the Academy of Music, low-priced seats to hear Leopold Stokowski conduct, and the Carnegie Library (Bivens, 2004). His birth name was Meyer R. Scholnick; he changed it at the age of fourteen while performing magic tricks at parties (Gieryn, 2004, p. 90). His intellectual ability earned him a scholarship to Temple University, opening a path out of the environment in which he had grown up.
During his undergraduate studies, Merton worked as a research assistant to George Simpson, who first introduced him to sociology and to influential figures such as Ralph Bunche and Franklin Frazier. Simpson also introduced him to Pitirim Sorokin, the founding chairman of Harvard University's sociology department. After completing his undergraduate degree, Merton received a fellowship to attend Harvard for graduate study. Sorokin soon hired him as a research assistant, and by Merton's second year they were publishing together. While at Harvard, Merton read widely and was shaped by thinkers including Sarton, Sorokin, L. J. Henderson, and Talcott Parsons. A course he took with Parsons deepened his sociological thinking and contributed to Parsons's landmark work The Structure of Social Action (Calhoun, 2003).
Merton's early essays, written and published during the Great Depression, include "Social Structure and Anomie" (1938). These initial writings clearly reflect the distress of the era. During this period, Merton became attuned to power imbalances and the unequal distribution of opportunities for success. The Great Depression devastated the economy, left millions unemployed, and forced many families from their homes into makeshift settlements known as Hoovervilles (Cole and Smith, 2002). However, approximately 40% of the population remained largely unaffected by the economic crisis (Bernanke, 1995, p. 119). Merton developed his hypothesis of anomie during this phase of depression and social imbalance. The country was simultaneously grappling with the economic collapse and large waves of immigrant arrivals (Bivens, 2004).
These difficult conditions led Merton to recognize that only certain groups of people could realistically achieve the American Dream. He observed the same unequal distribution of wealth among immigrants that he had witnessed firsthand in his childhood. His understanding that the American Dream was not equally attainable for all found expression in his famous essay "Social Structure and Anomie" (1938), which became a landmark text across several fields, including criminology. The essay gained added significance when Merton chose to extend his theory of anomie after engaging with Émile Durkheim's earlier theory of anomie.
In the field of criminology, Merton's contributions are wide-ranging. His work focuses primarily on deviant culture, and his most important publications include Social Theory and Social Structure (New York: Free Press, 1968), On Social Structure and Science (University of Chicago Press, 1996), and his most famous and widely cited article, "Social Structure and Anomie" (1938). Merton is credited with defining strain, manifest and latent functions, the self-fulfilling prophecy, deviance, anomie, and reference group theory — concepts that criminology has drawn upon extensively.
In "Social Structure and Anomie," Merton begins by challenging the biologically based theories of crime that were popular at the time. While those theories attributed criminal behavior to biological traits, Merton argued the opposite: that societal conditions are responsible for crime. He extended the anomie perspective after witnessing the crisis in mid-twentieth-century America (Pfohl, 1994, p. 261). Merton observed two sides of society — one in which people were productive and relatively unaffected by the crisis, and another marked by frustration and unequal access to societally defined goals. Whereas Durkheim had defined anomie as a sense of isolation linked to the deviant behavior of suicide, Merton extended the concept to offer a broader explanation of deviant behavior. His arguments about anomie did not receive wide attention until the 1980s, but his strain theory attracted theorists such as Cloward, Miller, Hirschi, and Cohen much earlier.
Merton's strain theory begins with the observation that wealth and material success are widespread American goals, yet society does not provide everyone with an equal opportunity to achieve them. Success through legitimate means — hard work and education — is socially approved, while illegitimate means violate social norms. Merton argues that as long as a society is stable, conformity is the dominant adaptation because individuals are socialized to pursue culturally prescribed goals through socially legitimate means. An individual is considered a conformist when they accept both the society's goals and the legitimate means for achieving them (Pfohl, 1994, p. 263).
Merton identified five adaptations to the tension between goals and means. In retreatism, individuals abandon both cultural goals and legitimate means. This group includes those Merton described as tramps, drug addicts, vagabonds, and vagrants — people who reject conventional society altogether due to their lack of ambition and unconventional way of life (as cited in Calhoun, 2013).
In innovation, individuals accept the cultural goals but pursue them through illegitimate means. Drug dealers, perpetrators of corporate crime, and those who falsify tax returns fall into this category. Innovation occurs when success is emphasized far more than the means of achieving it (as cited in Calhoun, 2013).
In ritualism, individuals abandon cultural goals while continuing to follow cultural norms. People in lower social positions with little realistic chance of achieving goals often adapt this way, partly out of fear of attempting innovation. They are considered deviant for abandoning cultural goals, yet they are regarded as good citizens because they do not break the rules (as cited in Calhoun, 2013).
In rebellion, individuals reject both cultural goals and means and substitute alternative ones. Rebels tend to support counterculture and push for radical changes through political revolution or the formation of unconventional religious movements (as cited in Calhoun, 2013).
While working with Paul Lazarsfeld at Columbia University, Merton collaborated on research into the influence of mass media. In their essay "Mass Communication, Popular Taste, and Organized Social Action," they expressed concern about the use of mass media by powerful interest groups to exert social control. Merton was also among the first social scientists to analyze the dysfunctions of bureaucracies. His theories explained how unequal distributions of wealth, power, and social rewards produce social stratification, and he argued that social inequality is a root cause of delinquency (as cited in Calhoun, 2013).
In his essay on manifest and latent functions, Merton distinguished between social consequences that are recognized and intended by members of a society (manifest functions) and those that are unintended and largely unrecognized (latent functions). For example, the proliferation of the automobile has the manifest functions of transportation and status, while a latent function is the reinforcement of personal autonomy at the expense of public transit. Applied to crime, manifest functions include providing employment for lawyers, judges, and police officers, as well as defining normative behavior for the rest of society. A latent function might be the institutionalization of minority groups within state authority. Merton's analysis demonstrated that crime itself functions within the social system (as cited in Calhoun, 2013).
In Social Theory and Social Structure (1957), Merton distinguished between two types of deviant behavior. The first, nonconforming behavior, involves a person who challenges the legitimacy of social values and actively seeks to change them. The second, aberrant behavior, involves a person who knows they are violating social norms but considers those violations practical and a form of self-expression (Merton, 1957, p. 352).
During the late 1960s and early 1970s, some sociologists questioned the empirical validity of Merton's anomie theory. However, this decline in acceptance was short-lived. Merton and others responded with devoted research and revisions that reinforced the theory's standing among leading criminologists (as cited in Calhoun, 2013).
From the statistics cited above, it is clear that Merton's theories and concepts are used across a wide range of disciplines. His influence on sociology and criminology is extraordinary and enduring. The sheer volume of citations — drawn from the American Sociological Review, the SSCI, the ASC, and Garfield's citation analyses — provides compelling evidence of how deeply Merton's ideas have shaped academic inquiry. From his foundational work on anomie and strain to his concepts of manifest and latent functions and the self-fulfilling prophecy, Robert K. Merton produced a body of thought that continues to be cited, critiqued, and extended across criminology and the social sciences.
You’re 59% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.